WHAT ABOUT IN-HOME WATER TREATMENT?
Many people buy home water treatment systems to further purify or
soften their water. Others use bottled water for drinking. What are
the choices?
Water softening Soft water can be obtained with reverse osmosis
(which also reduces TDS). Ion replacement systems (also called water
softeners) usually replace Ca and Mg with Na or K ions. Note that
ion replacement does not change the overall TDS of water
appreciably. Note also that soft water with high TDS should not be
used to irrigate plants. Since soft water is mostly desirable for
washing purposes, an entire water system does not have to be
connected to the water softener, possibly just the hot water line.
Added salt in the water can be dangerous for people on low salt
diets.
Removing pollutants People concerned with synthetic organic
pollutants such as pesticides and solvents (TCE) in the water can
install activated charcoal or other types of filters on their
drinking water taps. These systems work effectively if properly
maintained, but bacteria can accumulate if the systems are not
cleaned regularly. In order to remove some pollutants such as lead
and mercury, ion exchange filters are necessary. Usually these
systems are unnecessary in the Tucson area because our water already
meets all federal pollutant standards.
Improving taste If the taste of water is a problem, a person can
install filters as described above or can buy bottled water. While
generally of good quality, bottled water is not regulated by any
government agency and the quality may be no different from tap water
– in fact, the water may be bottled tap water. Taste is a subjective
matter, and some people have definite preferences in the brand of
bottled water.
One alternative to increased treatment of all city water is for
individuals who want different quality water to use in-home water
systems or bottled water. Everyone then is not charged extra for
water that will more than meet federal standards. This approach is
used in the Yuma area where a high percentage of people have water
softeners and buy bottled water. One argument against this approach
is that more affluent citizens would tend to have greater access to
these strategies.
|
REDUCING CORROSIVITY
All types of water are corrosive to some degree. Under certain
conditions, however, some water sources are more corrosive than others as
was evident when CAP water was introduced in Tucson. Several factors
influence water corrosivity. Table 6-4 lists these factors and suggests
ways of control. CAP water also has sulfate and chloride ion
concentrations four to five times higher than groundwater. Some evidence
exists that the presence of these ions (in high concentrations) may slow
down the formation of carbonate deposits on the water pipes, which impede
corrosion. The composition of the pipes also is an important factor. Old
iron and steel pipes are highly susceptible to corrosion. The treatment
processes described below increase the acidity of the water, which then
must be adjusted to avoid corrosion.
Maintaining a stable pH about 8.2 to 8.5 is an important factor in
controlling corrosivity. The pH of raw CAP water varies, but is generally
higher (more alkaline) than Tucson groundwater. When CAP water went
through the water treatment process, however, the pH was lowered to a
point even lower than most Tucson groundwater—from about 8 to about 7.4.
Unless the pH is again raised, the scale forming a protective coating
inside the pipes is stripped away, exposing bare metal to the corrosive
water. When CAP water was released from the treatment plant, the pH was
not readjusted, which was an important factor in corroding pipes. One
study showed that the pH varied between 7.0 and 8.4 over the period of CAP
water use. In July 1993, for example, the pH was under 7.4 and in August
it rose to almost 8.4.
|
Figure 6-4 Concern about the quality
of water provided by utilites has caused many people to seek
alternative sources of drinking water. Photo: Barbara
Tellman. |
Tucson’s long reliance on groundwater caused the inside of the pipes to
be coated with calcium carbonate, forming a protective layer on the inside
of the pipe. CAP water entering the system wore away this coating in some
pipes and exposed the underlying metal to corrosion. In severe cases the
pipes broke, and in less severe cases rust from the pipes entered the
water, causing a reddish color.
|
Table 6-4 Factors which affect
corrosion in water systems. |
Reducing corrosivity may be as simple as adjusting the pH and waiting
for the water and pipes to reach a new balance, or it may be more complex.
The three basic ways of dealing with corrosivity are:
- Increase pH by adding sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate or sodium
hydroxide.
- Promote scale formation by adding phosphate inhibitors such as
sodium orthophosphate, polyphosphate, zinc orthophosphate or silicates.
- Replace or re-line old pipes most subject to corrosion. (Replacing
old pipes must generally be done as a maintenance measure.)
Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages, but most water
chemists favor adjusting the pH.
The pH impacts the disinfection process because higher pH increases the
amount of chlorine or ozone needed but does not affect the amounts of
chloramines or chloride dioxide needed. Increased pH also tends to form
higher levels of THMs, but lowers the formation of other byproducts. The
disinfection process, in turn, alters the pH. Ozonation, for example,
lowers the pH. Tucson Water added zinc orthophosphate to the CAP water to
reduce the corrosion after damage had already begun. This strategy not
only was unsuccessful but it actually may have contributed to the problem
by further lowering the pH, preventing the water and pipes from achieving
a new balance. Switching to copper, plastic or asbestos cement water mains
would greatly help the situation, but old steel or iron pipes in
individual homes might still be vulnerable to corrosion. Blending CAP
water with groundwater has been proposed as a solution and is generally
supported, but one study indicated that this may actually increa se
corrosivity unless pH is controlled. According to this study blending
would result in a favorable reduction of the sulfate and chloride ion
concentrations without significantly changing the beneficial alkalinity.
As is shown in Table 6-5, however, many cities do blend Colorado River
water without experiencing major corrosivity problems.
|