Process Advisor Alternatives Search Links
Research Triangle Institute


Solvent Alternatives Guide
Wiping

Case Studies

The John Roberts Company in Minneapolis, MN is a commercial printer. They had been using a solvent containing TCA for handwiping press blankets between printing jobs. The leased towels were then returned to a commercial laundry for cleaning. The John Roberts Company initiated several changes which reduced the amount of solvent used and eliminated TCA from the blanket wash. The formulation of the solvent was changed to eliminate TCA. The wipers are now centrifuged to extract cleaning solvent. The reclaimed solvent is used in parts washers to clean ink trays and roller chains. Spent solvent is sent out for fuel blending. The explosion-proof centrifuge cost $15,000. In its first year of operation, John Roberts Company saved $34,000 in solvent purchases. The laundry's problems in cleaning the solvent soaked wipers have been eliminated. Fugitive emissions have been reduced in the printery because the new formulation is less volatile.

Jeff Adrian, John Roberts Co., 9687 East River Rd., Minneapolis, MN, 55433, Design for the Environment, Case Study 1, US EPA


Martin Marietta Astronautics has replaced 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) with a terpene cleaner for handwiping operations. The terpene cleaner was decided upon after 16 months of extensive testing of citrus and alkaline-based compounds. Workers prefer the citrus-based cleaner because it is more efficient. The terpene cleaner leaves less residue resulting in higher coating bond strength. Martin Marietta estimates the change has reduced toxic emissions by thousands of pounds per year. Research costs were $350,000 to find a suitable replacement for MEK and TCA. Estimated savings are $250,000 per year.

Dykema, Kevin J., and George R. Larsen. 1993. Shifting the Environmental Paradigm at Martin Marietta Astronautics. Pollution Prevention Review, Spring:202-204.


Since 1988, Allied-Signal Aerospace in Kansas City, Missouri has used a volatile aqueous cleaner for wiping work surfaces of laminar flow work stations, finger cots, latex gloves, and fixtures to remove light soils and particulates. The volatile aqueous cleaner consists of 12.5% isopropyl alcohol, 0.82% surfactant, and the remainder is deionized water. The solvent removes both organic and inorganic soils. The previous solvent, CFC-113, was consumed at the rate of 2000 lb/month and has been completely eliminated for wiping. The volatile aqueous cleaner is also used in ultrasonic baths to clean complicated machined assemblies. Allied-Signal Aerospace reports better cleaning and lower cost, about $1.00/gallon.

Hand, Tom and Bohnert, George/Allied-Signal Aerospace, Case Study #3: Development and Use of a Volatile Aqueous Cleaner, EPA/ICOLP Eliminating CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform in Aircraft Maintenance Procedures, EPA-430-B-93-006, October 1993, pp. 161-162.


State Information | Glossary | Conversion Checklist | Comments

Home | Process Advisor | Alternatives | Links | Search

All SAGE material, Copyright© 1992, Research Triangle Institute
Last Update: 29 December 1998
sage@rti.org
http://clean.rti.org/alt_cs.cfm?id=wp&cat=cs

 
Disclaimer