
|
B1. Management Measure for Facility Wastewater and Runoff from Confined
Animal Facility Management (Large Units)
Limit the discharge from the confined animal facility to surface waters by:
- Storing both the facility wastewater and the runoff from confined animal
facilities that is caused by storms up to and including a 25-year, 24-hour frequency
storm. Storage structures should:
- Have an earthen lining or plastic membrane lining, or
- Be constructed with
concrete, or
- Be a storage tank;
and
- Managing stored runoff and accumulated solids from the facility through an
appropriate waste utilization system.
This
management measure is intended for application by States to all new facilities
regardless of size and to all new or existing confined animal facilities that contain the
following number of head or more:
Head Animal Units (2)
Beef Feedlots 300 300
Stables (horses) 200 400
Dairies 70 98
Layers 15,000 150 (3)
495 (4)
Broilers 15,000 150 (3)
495 (4)
Turkeys 13,750 2,475
Swine 200 80
(2) See Animal Unit in
Glossary (3) If
facility has a liquid manure system (4) If facility has continuous overflow watering
except those facilities that are required by Federal regulation 40 CFR 122.23 to
apply for and receive discharge permits. That section applies to "concentrated animal
feeding operations," which are defined in 40 CFR Part 122, Appendix B. In addition, 40
CFR 122.23(c) provides that the Director of an NPDES discharge permit program may
designate any animal feeding operation as a concentrated animal feeding operation
(which has the effect of subjecting the operation to the NPDES permit program
requirements) upon determining that it is a significant contributor of water pollution. In
such cases, upon issuance of a permit, the terms of the permit apply and this
management measure ceases to apply.
Under the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments, States are subject to a
number of requirements as they develop coastal nonpoint programs in conformity with
this measure and will have some flexibility in doing so. The application of management
measures by States is described more fully in Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control
Program: Program Development and Approval Guidance, published jointly by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
A confined animal facility is a lot or facility (other than an aquatic animal
production facility) where the following conditions are met:
- Animals (other than aquatic animals) have been, are, or will be stabled or
confined and fed or maintained for a total of 45 days or more in any 12-month period,
and
- Crops, vegetation forage growth, or post-harvest residues are not sustained in
the normal growing season over any portion of the lot or facility.
Two or more animal facilities under common ownership are considered, for the
purposes of these guidelines, to be a single animal facility if they adjoin each other or if
they use a common area or system for the disposal of wastes.
Confined animal facilities, as defined above, include areas used to grow or house the
animals, areas used for processing and storage of product, manure and runoff storage
areas, and silage storage areas.
Facility wastewater and runoff from confined animal facilities are to be controlled under
this management measure (Figure 2-7). Runoff includes any precipitation (rain or
snow) that comes into contact with any manure, litter, or bedding. Facility wastewater is
water discharged in the operation of an animal facility as a result of any or all of the
following: animal or poultry watering; washing, cleaning, or flushing pens, barns,
manure pits, or other animal facilities; washing or spray cooling of animals; and dust
control.
The problems associated with
animal facilities result from
runoff, facility wastewater, and manure. For additional information regarding problems,
see Section I.F.3 of this chapter.
Application of this management measure will greatly reduce the volume of runoff,
manure, and facility wastewater reaching a waterbody, thereby improving water quality
and the use of the water resource. The measure can be implemented by using
practices that divert runoff water from upslope sites and roofs away from the facility,
thereby minimizing the amount of water to be stored and managed. Runoff water and
facility wastewater should be routed through a settling structure or debris basin to
remove solids, and then stored in a pit, pond, or lagoon for application on agricultural
land (Figure 2-8). If manure is managed as a liquid, all manure, runoff, and facility
wastewater can be stored in the same structure and there is no need for a debris basin.
For new facilities and expansions to existing facilities, consideration should be given to
siting the facility:
- Away from surface waters;
- Away from areas with high leaching potential; and
- In areas where adequate land is available to apply animal wastes in accordance
with the nutrient management measure.
This management measure does
not require manure storage structures or areas, nor does it specify required
manure management practices. This management measure does, however, address
the management of runoff from manure storage areas. Manure may be stacked
in the confined lot or other appropriate area as long as the storage and management of
runoff from the confined lot are in accordance with this management measure. If
manure is managed as a solid, any drainage from the storage area or structure area or
structure should be routed to the runoff storage system.
When applied to agricultural lands, manure, stored runoff water, stored facility
wastewater, and accumulated solids from the facility are to be applied in accordance
with the nutrient management measure. An appropriate waste utilization system to
minimize impacts to surface water and protect ground water may be achieved through
implementation of the SCS Waste Utilization practice (633).
It is recognized that implementation of this measure may increase the potential for
movement of water and soluble pollutants through the soil profile to the ground water. It
is not the intent of this measure to address a surface water problem at the expense of
ground water. Facility wastewater and runoff control systems can and should be
designed to protect ground water. Ground-water protection will also be provided by
minimizing seepage to ground water, if soil conditions require further protection, and by
using the nutrient and pesticide management measures to reduce and control the
application of nutrients and pesticides.
Seepage to ground water can be minimized by lining the runoff or manure storage
structure with an earthen lining or plastic membrane lining, by constructing with
concrete, or by constructing a storage tank. This is not difficult to accomplish and
should be achieved in the initial design to reduce costs. For some soils and locations,
movement of pollutants to the ground water is not a concern, but site evaluations are
needed to determine the appropriate action to take to protect the resources at the
site.
Operation and Maintenance of This Measure
Operation
Holding ponds and treatment lagoons should be operated such that the design storm
volume is available for storage of runoff. Facilities filled to or near capacity should be
drawn down as soon as all site conditions permit the safe removal and appropriate use
of stored materials. Solids should be removed from solids separation basins as soon as
possible following storm events to ensure that needed solids storage volume is
available for subsequent storms.
Maintenance
Diversions will need periodic reshaping and should be free of trees and brush growth.
Gutters and downspouts should be inspected annually and repaired when needed.
Established grades for lot surfaces and conveyance channels are to be maintained at
all times.
Channels should be free of trees and brush growth. Cleaning of debris basins, holding
ponds, and lagoons will be needed to ensure that design volumes are maintained.
Clean water should be excluded from the storage structure unless it is needed for
further dilution in a liquid system.
This
management measure was selected
for larger-sized animal production facilities because it can eliminate the pollutants
leaving a facility by storing runoff from storms up to and including the 25-year, 24-hour
frequency storm. It also uses practices that reduce the amount of water that comes into
contact with animal waste materials. It requires that stored runoff and accumulated
solids from the facility are managed through an appropriate waste utilization system.
Any stored water, accumulated solids, processed dead animals, or manure are to be
applied in accordance with the nutrient management measure.
The size limitations that define a large unit are based on EPA's analysis of the
economic achievability of the management measure.
The
effectiveness of management practices to
control contaminant losses from confined livestock facilities depends on several factors
including:
- The contaminant(s) to be controlled and their likely pathways in surface,
subsurface, and ground-water flows;
- The types of practices (section 5) and how these practices control surface,
subsurface, and ground-water contaminant pathways; and
- Site-specific variables such as soil type, topography, precipitation characteristics,
type of animal housing and waste storage facilities, method of waste collection,
handling and disposal, and seasonal variations. The site-specific conditions must be
considered in system design, thus having a large effect on practice effectiveness
levels.
The gross effectiveness estimates reported in Table 2-9
simply indicate summary literature values. For specific cases, a wide range of
effectiveness can be expected depending on the value and interaction of the
site-specific variables cited above.
When runoff from storms up to and including the 24-hour, 25-year frequency storm is
stored, there will be no release of pollutants from a confined animal facility via the
surface runoff route. Rare storms of a greater magnitude or sequential storms of
combined greater magnitude may produce runoff, however. Table 2-10 reflects the occurrence of such storms by indicating
less than 100 percent control for runoff control systems.
As discussed more fully
at the beginning of this chapter and in Chapter 1, the following practices are described
for illustrative purposes only. State programs need not require implementation of these
practices. However, as a practical matter, EPA anticipates that the management
measure set forth above generally will be implemented by applying one or more
management practices appropriate to the source, location, and climate. The practices
set forth below have been found by EPA to be representative of the types of practices
that can be applied successfully to achieve the management measure described
above.
Combinations of the following practices can be used to satisfy the requirements of this
management measure. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) practice number and
definition are provided for each management practice, where available. Also included
in italics are SCS statements describing the effect each practice has on water quality
(USDA-SCS, 1988).
a. Dikes (356): An embankment constructed of earth or other suitable
materials to protect land against overflow or to regulate water.
Where dikes are used to prevent water from flowing onto the floodplain, the
pollution dispersion effect of the temporary wetlands and backwater are decreased.
The sediment, sediment-attached, and soluble materials being transported by the water
are carried farther downstream. The final fate of these materials must be investigated
on site. Where dikes are used to retain runoff on the floodplain or in wetlands the
pollution dispersion effects of these areas may be enhanced. Sediment and related
materials may be deposited, and the quality of the water flowing into the stream from
this area will be improved.
Dikes are used to prevent wetlands and to form wetlands. The formed areas may be
fresh, brackish, or saltwater wetlands. In tidal areas dikes are used to stop saltwater
intrusion, and to increase the hydraulic head of fresh water which will force intruded
salt water out the aquifer. During construction there is a potential of heavy sediment
loadings to the surface waters. When pesticides are used to control the brush on the
dikes and fertilizers are used for the establishment and maintenance of vegetation
there is the possibility for these materials to be washed into the surface waters.
b. Diversions (362): A channel constructed across the slope with a supporting
ridge on the lower side.
This practice will assist in the stabilization of a watershed, resulting in the reduction of
sheet and rill erosion by reducing the length of slope. Sediment may be reduced by the
elimination of ephemeral and large gullies. This may reduce the amount of sediment
and related pollutants delivered to the surface waters.
c. Grassed waterway (412): A natural or constructed channel that is shaped or
graded to required dimensions and established in suitable vegetation for the stable
conveyance of runoff.
This practice may reduce the erosion in a concentrated flow area, such as in a gully or
in ephemeral gullies. This may result in the reduction of sediment and substances
delivered to receiving waters. Vegetation may act as a filter in removing some of the
sediment delivered to the waterway, although this is not the primary function of a
grassed waterway.
Any chemicals applied to the waterway in the course of treatment of the adjacent
cropland may wash directly into the surface waters in the case where there is a runoff
event shortly after spraying.
When used as a stable outlet for another practice, waterways may increase the
likelihood of dissolved and suspended pollutants being transported to surface waters
when these pollutants are delivered to the waterway.
d. Heavy use area protection (561): Protecting heavily used areas by
establishing vegetative cover, by surfacing with suitable materials, or by installing
needed structures.
Protection may result in a general improvement of surface water quality through the
reduction of erosion and the resulting sedimentation. Some increase in erosion may
occur during and immediately after construction until the disturbed areas are fully
stabilized.
Some increase in chemicals in surface water may occur due to the introduction of
fertilizers for vegetated areas and oils and chemicals associated with paved areas.
Fertilizers and pesticides used during operation and maintenance may be a source of
water pollution.
Paved areas installed for livestock use will increase organic, bacteria, and nutrient
loading to surface waters. Changes in ground water quality will be minor. Nitrate
nitrogen applied as fertilizer in excess of vegetation needs may move with infiltrating
waters. The extent of the problem, if any, may depend on the actual amount of water
percolating below the root zone.
e. Lined waterway or outlet (468): A waterway or outlet having an
erosion-resistant lining of concrete, stone, or other permanent material.
The lined section extends up the side slopes to a designed depth. The earth above
the permanent lining may be vegetated or otherwise protected.
This practice may reduce the erosion in concentrated flow areas resulting in the
reduction of sediment and substances delivered to the receiving waters.
When used as a stable outlet for another practice, lined waterways may increase the
likelihood of dissolved and suspended substances being transported to surface waters
due to high flow velocities.
f. Roof runoff management (558): A facility for controlling and disposing of
runoff water from roofs.
This practice may reduce erosion and the delivery of sediment and related substances
to surface waters. It will reduce the volume of water polluted by animal wastes.
Loadings of organic waste, nutrients, bacteria, and salts to surface water are prevented
from flowing across concentrated waste areas, barnyards, roads and alleys will be
reduced. Pollution and erosion will be reduced. Flooding may be prevented and
drainage may improve.
g. Terrace (600): An earthen embankment, a channel, or combination ridge and
channel constructed across the slope.
This practice reduces the slope length and the amount of surface runoff which passes
over the area downslope from an individual terrace. This may reduce the erosion rate
and production of sediment within the terrace interval. Terraces trap sediment and
reduce the sediment and associated pollutant content in the runoff water which
enhances surface water quality. Terraces may intercept and conduct surface runoff at a
nonerosive velocity to stable outlets, thus reducing the occurrence of ephemeral and
classic gullies and the resulting sediment. Increases in infiltration can cause a greater
amount of soluble nutrients and pesticides to be leached into the soil. Underground
outlets may collect highly soluble nutrient and pesticide leachates and convey runoff
and conveying it directly to an outlet, terraces may increase the delivery of pollutants to
surface waters. Terraces increase the opportunity to leach salts below the root zone in
the soil. Terraces may have a detrimental effect on water quality if they concentrate
and accelerate delivery of dissolved or suspended nutrient, salt, and pesticide
pollutants to surface or ground waters.
h. Waste storage pond (425): An impoundment made by excavation or earth fill
for temporary storage of animal or other agricultural wastes.
This practice reduces the direct delivery of polluted water, which is the runoff from
manure stacking areas and feedlots and barnyards, to the surface waters. This practice
may reduce the organic, pathogen, and nutrient loading to surface waters. This practice
may increase the dissolved pollutant loading to ground water by leakage through the
sidewalls and bottom.
i. Waste storage structure (313): A fabricated structure for temporary storage of
animal wastes or other organic agricultural wastes.
This practice may reduce the nutrient, pathogen, and organic loading to the surface
waters. This is accomplished by intercepting and storing the polluted runoff from
manure stacking areas, barnyards and feedlots. This practice will not eliminate the
possibility of contaminating surface and ground water; however, it greatly reduces this
possibility.
j. Waste treatment lagoon (359): An impoundment made by excavation or earth
fill for biological treatment of animal or other agricultural wastes.
This practice may reduce polluted surficial runoff and the loading of organics,
pathogens, and nutrients into the surface waters. It decreases the nitrogen content of
the surface runoff from feedlots by denitrification. Runoff is retained long enough that
the solids and insoluble phosphorus settle and form a sludge in the bottom of the
lagoon. There may be some seepage through the sidewalls and the bottom of the
lagoon. Usually the long-term seepage rate is low enough, so that the concentration of
substances transported into the ground water does not reach an unacceptable
level.
k. Application of manure and/or runoff water to agricultural land
Manure and runoff water are applied to agricultural lands and incorporated into the
soil in accordance with the management measures for nutrients.
l. Waste utilization (633): Using agricultural wastes or other wastes on land in
an environmentally acceptable manner while maintaining or improving soil and plant
resources.
Waste utilization helps reduce the transport of sediment and related pollutants to the
surface water. Proper site selection, timing of application and rate of application may
reduce the potential for degradation of surface and ground water. This practice may
increase microbial action in the surface layers of the soil, causing a reaction which
assists in controlling pesticides and other pollutants by keeping them in place in the
field.
Mortality and other compost, when applied to agricultural land, will be applied in
accordance with the nutrient management measure. The composting facility may be
subject to State regulations and will have a written operation and management plan if
SCS practice 317 (composting facility) is used.
m. Composting facility (317): A facility for the biological stabilization of waste
organic material.
The purpose is to treat waste organic material biologically by producing a
humus-like material that can be recycled as a soil amendment and fertilizer substitute
or otherwise utilized in compliance with all laws, rules, and regulations.
n. Commercial rendering or disposal services
o. Incineration
p. Approved burial sites
Construction costs for control
of runoff and manure
from confined animal facilities are provided in Table 2-11
10k. The annual operation and maintenance costs average 4 percent of
construction costs for diversions, 3 percent of construction costs for settlement basins,
and 5 percent of construction costs for retention ponds (DPRA, 1992). Annual costs for
repairs, maintenance, taxes, and insurance are estimated to be 5 percent of investment
costs for irrigation systems (DPRA, 1992).
Return to Previous
Section
Continue to Next
Section
Return to the Table of Contents
This page last updated October 4, 1999
|