
|
B2. Management Measure for Facility Wastewater and Runoff from Confined
Animal Facility Management (Small Units) Design and implement systems
that collect solids, reduce contaminant concentrations, and reduce runoff to minimize
the discharge of contaminants in both facility wastewater and in runoff that is caused by
storms up to and including a 25-year, 24-hour frequency storm. Implement these
systems to substantially reduce significant increases in pollutant loadings to ground
water.
Manage stored runoff and accumulated solids from the facility through an appropriate
waste utilization system.
This management measure is
intended for application by
States to all existing confined animal facilities that contain the following number of
head:
Head Animal Units (5)
Beef Feedlots 50-299 50-299
Stables (horses) 100-199 200-399
Dairies 20-69 28-97
Layers 5,000-14,999 50-149 (6)
165-494 (7)
Broilers 5,000-14,999 50-149 (6)
165-494 (7)
Turkeys 5,000-13,749 900-2,474
Swine 100-199 40-79
(5) See animal unit in Glossary. (6) If
facility has a liquid
manure system. (7) If facility has continuous overflow watering. except
those facilities that are required by Federal regulation 40 CFR 122.23(c) to apply for
and receive discharge permits. 40 CFR 122.23(c) provides that the Director of an
NPDES discharge permit program may designate any animal feeding operation as a
concentrated animal feeding operation (which has the effect of subjecting the operation
to the NPDES permit program requirements) upon determining that it is a significant
contributor of water pollution. In such cases, upon issuance of a permit, the terms of the
permit apply and this management measure ceases to apply.
Facilities containing fewer than the number of head listed above are not subject to the
requirements of this management measure. Existing facilities that meet the
requirements of Management Measure B1 for large units
are in compliance with the requirements of this management measure. Existing and
new facilities that already minimize the discharge of contaminants to surface waters,
protect against contamination of ground water, and have an appropriate waste
utilization system may already meet the requirements of this management measure.
Such facilities may not need additional controls for the purposes of this management
measure.
Under the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments, States are subject to a
number of requirements as they develop coastal nonpoint programs in conformity with
this measure and will have some flexibility in doing so. The application of management
measures by States is described more fully in Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control
Program: Program Development and Approval Guidance, published jointly by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
A confined animal facility is a lot or facility (other than an aquatic animal
production facility) where the following conditions are met:
- Animals (other than aquatic animals) have been, are, or will be stabled or
confined and fed or maintained for a total of 45 days or more in any 12-month period,
and
- Crops, vegetation forage growth, or post-harvest residues are not sustained in
the normal growing season over any portion of the lot or facility.
Two or more
animal facilities under common ownership are considered, for the purposes of these
guidelines, to be a single animal facility if they adjoin each other or if they use a
common area or system for the disposal of wastes.
Confined animal facilities, as defined above, include areas used to grow or house the
animals, areas used for processing and storage of product, manure and runoff storage
areas, and silage storage areas.
Facility wastewater and runoff from confined animal facilities are to be controlled under
this management measure (Figure 2-9). Runoff includes any precipitation (rain or
snow) that comes into contact with any manure, litter, or bedding. Facility wastewater is
water discharged in the operation of an animal facility as a result of any or all of the
following: animal or poultry watering; washing, cleaning, or flushing pens, barns,
manure pits, or other animal facilities; washing or spray cooling of animals; and dust
control.
The goal of this management
measure is to minimize the
discharge of contaminants in both facility wastewater and in runoff that is caused by
storms up to and including a 25-year, 24-hour frequency storm by using practices such
as solids separation basins in combination with vegetative practices and other
practices that reduce runoff and are also protective of ground water.
The problems associated with animal facilities are the control of runoff, facility
wastewater, and manure. For additional information regarding problems, see Section
I.F.3. of this chapter.
Application of this management measure will greatly reduce the volume of runoff,
manure, and facility wastewater reaching a waterbody, thereby improving water quality
and the use of the water resource. The measure can be implemented by using
practices that divert runoff water from upslope sites and roofs away from the facility,
thereby minimizing the amount of water that must be managed (Figure 2-10). Runoff
water and facility wastewater from the facility should be routed through a settling
structure or debris basin to remove solids. If manure is managed as a liquid, all
manure, runoff, and facility wastewater can be stored in the same structure and there is
no need for a debris basin.
This management measure does not require manure storage structures or
areas, nor does it specify required manure management practices. This management
measure does, however, address the management of runoff from manure
storage areas. Manure may be stacked in the confined lot or other appropriate area as
long as the discharge is minimized and any stored runoff is managed in accordance
with this management measure. If manure is managed as a solid, any drainage from
the storage area or structure should be routed to the runoff control practices.
When applied to agricultural lands, manure, stored runoff water, stored facility
wastewater, and accumulated solids from the facility are to be applied in accordance
with the nutrient management measure. An appropriate waste utilization system to
minimize impacts to surface water and protect ground water may be achieved through
implementation of the SCS Waste Utilization practice (633).
It is recognized that implementation of this measure may increase the potential for
movement of water and soluble pollutants through the soil profile to the ground water. It
is not the intent of this measure to address a surface water problem at the expense of
ground water. Facility wastewater and runoff control systems can and should be
designed to protect against the contamination of ground water. Ground-water
protection will also be provided by minimizing seepage to ground water, if soil
conditions require further protection, and by using the nutrient and pesticide
management measures to reduce and control the application of nutrients and
pesticides. While a nutrient management plan is not required to be implemented on the
vegetative control practices themselves, ground water should be protected by taking
extreme care to not exceed the capacity of the practices to assimilate nutrients.
When storage structures are used to meet the requirements of this management
measure, seepage to ground water can be minimized by lining the runoff or manure
storage structure with an earthen lining or plastic membrane lining, by constructing with
concrete, or by constructing a storage tank. This is not difficult to accomplish and
should be achieved in the initial design to reduce costs. For some soils and locations
movement of pollutants to the ground water is not a concern, but each site must be
evaluated and the appropriate action taken to protect the resources at the site.
Operation and Maintenance of This Measure Operation
Holding ponds and treatment lagoons should be operated such that the design storm
volume is available for storage of runoff. Facilities that have filled should be drawn
down as soon as all site conditions permit the safe removal and appropriate use of
stored materials. Solids should be removed from solids separation basins as soon as
possible following storm events to ensure that needed solids storage volume is
available for subsequent storms.
Maintenance
Diversions will need periodic reshaping and should be free of trees and brush growth.
Gutters and downspouts should be inspected annually and repaired when needed.
Established grades for lot surfaces and conveyance channels must be maintained at all
times.
Channels must be free of trees and brush growth. Cleaning of debris basins, holding
ponds, and lagoons will be needed to ensure that design volumes are maintained.
Clean water should be excluded from the storage structure unless it is needed for
further dilution in a liquid system.
This
management measure was selected
for smaller-sized animal production facilities based on an evaluation of available
information that documents the beneficial effects of improved management of confined
livestock facilities. Specifically, the management measure reduces the amount of
pollutants leaving a facility by using practices that reduce the amount of water that
comes into contact with animal waste materials. It also uses solid removal and filtration
of runoff water to remove a significant amount of the pollutants contained in the runoff
waters. This can be accomplished without the expense of constructing a runoff storage
structure and purchasing the equipment necessary to apply the stored water to the
land.
This management measure also requires that stored runoff and accumulated solids
from the facility are managed through an appropriate waste utilization system. The size
limitations that define a small unit are based on EPA's analysis of the economic
achievability of the management measure.
The
effectiveness information presented for
large units (Tables 2-9 and 2-10) also applies to this management measure.
Pollutant loads from runoff caused by storms up to and including the 25-year, 24-hour
frequency storm can be reduced by decreasing the potential for runoff contamination
(e.g., by keeping accumulations of manure off the open lots), and by removing the
contaminants to the fullest extent practicable through vegetative and structural
practices (e.g., solids separation devices, sediment basins, filter strips, and constructed
wetlands). Pollutant loads can also be reduced by storing and applying the runoff to the
land with any manure and facility wastewater in accordance with the nutrient
management measure.
Table 2-12 shows reductions in pollutant concentrations
that are achievable with solids separation basins that receive runoff from barnyards
and feedlots. Concentration reductions may differ from the load reductions presented in
Tables 2-9 and 2-10 since loads are determined by both concentration and discharge
volume. Solids separation basins combined with drained infiltration beds and vegetated
filter strips (VFS) provide additional reductions in contaminant concentrations. The
effectiveness of solids separation basins is highly dependent on site variables. Solids
separation; basin sizing and management (clean-out); characteristics of VFS areas
such as soil type, land slope, length, vegetation type, vegetation quality; and storm
amounts and intensities all play important roles in the performance of the system.
Appropriate operation and maintenance are critical to success.
As discussed more fully
at the beginning of this chapter and in Chapter 1, the following practices are described
for illustrative purposes only. State programs need not require implementation of these
practices. However, as a practical matter, EPA anticipates that the management
measure set forth above generally will be implemented by applying one or more
management practices appropriate to the source, location, and climate. The practices
set forth below have been found by EPA to be representative of the types of practices
that can be applied successfully to achieve the management measure described
above.
Combinations of the following practices can be used to satisfy the requirements of this
management measure. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) practice number and
definition are provided for each management practice, where available. Also included
in italics are SCS statements describing the effect each practice has on water quality
(USDA-SCS, 1988).
a. Waste storage pond (425): An impoundment made by excavation or earth
fill for temporary storage of animal or other agricultural waste.
This practice reduces the direct delivery of polluted water, which is the runoff from
manure stacking areas and feedlots and barnyards, to the surface waters. This practice
may reduce the organic, pathogen, and nutrient loading to surface waters. This practice
may increase the dissolved pollutant loading to ground water by leakage through the
sidewalls and bottom.
b. Waste storage structure (313): A fabricated structure for temporary storage of
animal waste or other organic agricultural waste.
This practice may reduce the nutrient, pathogen, and organic loading to the surface
waters. This is accomplished by intercepting and storing the polluted runoff from
manure stacking areas, barnyards and feedlots. This practice will not eliminate the
possibility of contaminating surface and ground water; however, it greatly reduces this
possibility.
c. Waste treatment lagoon (359): An impoundment made by excavation or earth
fill for biological treatment of animal or other agricultural waste.
This practice may reduce polluted surficial runoff and the loading of organics,
pathogens, and nutrients into the surface waters. It decreases the nitrogen content of
the surface runoff from feedlots by denitrification. Runoff is retained long enough that
the solids and insoluble phosphorus settle and form a sludge in the bottom of the
lagoon. There may be some seepage through the sidewalls and the bottom of the
lagoon. Usually the long-term seepage rate is low enough, so that the concentration of
substances transported into the ground water does not reach an unacceptable
level.
d. Sediment basin (350): A basin constructed to collect and store debris or
sediment.
Sediment basins will remove sediment, sediment associated materials and other debris
from the water which is passed on downstream. Due to the detention of the runoff in the
basin, there is an increased opportunity for soluble materials to be leached toward the
ground water.
e. Water and sediment control basin (638): An earth embankment or a
combination ridge and channel generally constructed across the slope and minor water
courses to form a sediment trap and a water detention basin.
The practice traps and removes sediment and sediment-attached substances from
runoff. Trap control efficiencies for sediment and total phosphorus, that are transported
by runoff, may exceed 90 percent in silt loam soils. Dissolved substance, such as
nitrates, may be removed from discharge to downstream areas because of the
increased infiltration. Where geologic condition permit, the practice will lead to
increased loadings of dissolved substances toward ground water. Water temperatures
of surface runoff, released through underground outlets, may increase slightly because
of longer exposure to warming during its impoundment.
f. Filter strip (393): A strip or area of vegetation for removing sediment, organic
matter, and other contaminants from runoff and wastewater.
Filter strips for sediment and related pollutants meeting minimum requirements may
trap the coarser grained sediment. They may not filter out soluble or suspended
fine-grained materials. When a storm caused runoff in excess of the design runoff, the
filter may be flooded and may cause large loads of pollutants to be released to the
surface water. This type of filter requires high maintenance and has a relatively short
service life and is effective only as long as the flow through the filter is shallow sheet
flow.
Filter strips for runoff from concentrated livestock areas may trap organic material,
solids, materials which become adsorbed to the vegetation or the soil within the filter.
Often they will not filter out soluble materials. This type of filter is often wet and is
difficult to maintain.
Filter strips for controlled overland flow treatment of liquid wastes may effectively filter
out pollutants. The filter must be properly managed and maintained, including the
proper resting time. Filter strips on forest land may trap coarse sediment, timbering
debris, and other deleterious material being transported by runoff. This may improve
the quality of surface water and has little effect on soluble material in runoff or on the
quality of ground water.
All types of filters may reduce erosion on the area on which they are constructed.
Filter strips trap solids from the runoff flowing in sheet flow through the filter.
Coarse-grained and fibrous materials are filtered more efficiently than fine-grained and
soluble substances. Filter strips work for design conditions, but when flooded or
overloaded they may release a slug load of pollutants into the surface water.
g. Grassed waterway (412): A natural or constructed channel that is shaped or
graded to required dimensions and established in a suitable vegetation for the stable
conveyance of runoff.
This practice may reduce the erosion in a concentrated flow area, such as in a gully or
in ephemeral gullies. This may result in the reduction of sediment and substances
delivered to receiving waters. Vegetation may act as a filter in removing some of the
sediment delivered to the waterway, although this is not the primary function of a
grassed waterway.
Any chemicals applied to the waterway in the course of treatment of the adjacent
cropland may wash directly into the surface waters in the case where there is a runoff
event shortly after spraying.
When used as a stable outlet for another practice, waterways may increase the
likelihood of dissolved and suspended pollutants being transported to surface waters
when these pollutants are delivered to the waterway.
h. Constructed wetland (ASCS-999): A constructed aquatic ecosystem with
rooted emergent hydrophytes designed and managed to treat agricultural
wastewater.
This is a conservation practice for which SCS has developed technical
requirements under a trial program leading to the development of a conservation
practice standard.
i. Dikes (356): An embankment constructed of earth or other suitable materials
to protect land against overflow or to regulate water.
Where dikes are used to prevent water from flowing onto the floodplain, the pollution
dispersion effects of the temporary wetlands and backwater are decreased. The
sediment, sediment-attached, and soluble materials being transported by the water are
carried farther downstream. The final fate of these materials must be investigated on
site. Where dikes are used to retain runoff on the floodplain or in wetlands the pollution
dispersion effects of these areas may be enhanced. Sediment and related materials
may be deposited, and the quality of the water flowing into the stream from this area
will be improved.
Dikes are used to prevent wetlands and to form wetlands. The formed areas may be
fresh, brackish, or saltwater wetlands. In tidal areas dikes are used to stop saltwater
intrusion, and to increase the hydraulic head of fresh water which will force intruded
salt water out the aquifer. During construction there is a potential of heavy sediment
loadings to the surface waters. When pesticides are used to control the brush on the
dikes and fertilizers are used for the establishment and maintenance of vegetation
there is the possibility for these materials to be washed into the surface waters.
j. Diversion (362): A channel constructed across the slope with a supporting
ridge on the lower side.
This practice will assist in the stabilization of a watershed, resulting in the reduction of
sheet and rill erosion by reducing the length of slope. Sediment may be reduced by the
elimination of ephemeral and large gullies. This may reduce the amount of sediment
and related pollutants delivered to the surface waters.
k. Heavy use area protection (561): Protecting heavily used areas by
establishing vegetative cover, by surfacing with suitable materials, or by installing
needed structures.
Protection may result in a general improvement of surface water quality through the
reduction of erosion and the resulting sedimentation. Some increase in erosion may
occur during and immediately after construction until the disturbed areas are fully
stabilized.
Some increase in chemicals in surface water may occur due to the introduction of
fertilizers for vegetated areas and oils and chemicals associated with paved areas.
Fertilizers and pesticides used during operation and maintenance may be a source of
water pollution.
Paved areas installed for livestock use will increase organic, bacteria, and nutrient
loading to surface waters. Changes in ground water quality will be minor. Nitrate
nitrogen applied as fertilizer in excess of vegetation needs may move with infiltrating
waters. The extent of the problem, if any, may depend on the actual amount of water
percolating below the root zone.
l. Lined waterway or outlet (468): A waterway or outlet having an
erosion-resistant lining of concrete, stone, or other permanent material.
The lined section extends up the side slopes to a designed depth. The earth above
the permanent lining may be vegetated or otherwise protected.
This practice may reduce the erosion in concentrated flow areas resulting in the
reduction of sediment and substances delivered to the receiving waters.
When used as a stable outlet for another practice, lined waterways may increase the
likelihood of dissolved and suspended substances being transported to surface waters
due to high flow velocities.
m. Roof runoff management (558): A facility for controlling and disposing of
runoff water from roofs.
This practice may reduce erosion and the delivery of sediment and related substances
to surface waters. It will reduce the volume of water polluted by animal wastes.
Loadings of organic waste, nutrients, bacteria, and salts to surface water are prevented
from flowing across concentrated waste areas, barnyards, roads and alleys. Pollution
and erosion will be reduced. Flooding may be prevented and drainage may
improve.
n. Terrace (600): An earthen embankment, a channel, or combination ridge and
channel constructed across the slope.
This practice reduces the slope length and the amount of surface runoff which passes
over the area downslope from an individual terrace. This may reduce the erosion rate
and production of sediment within the terrace interval. Terraces trap sediment and
reduce the sediment and associated pollutant content in the runoff water which
enhance surface water quality. Terraces may intercept and conduct surface runoff at a
nonerosive velocity to stable outlets, thus reducing the occurrence of ephemeral and
classic gullies and the resulting sediment. Increases in infiltration can cause a greater
amount of soluble nutrients and pesticides to be leached into the soil. Underground
outlets may collect highly soluble nutrient and pesticide leachates and convey runoff
and conveying it directly to an outlet, terraces may increase the delivery of pollutants to
surface waters. Terraces increase the opportunity to leach salts below the root zone in
the soil. Terraces may have a detrimental effect on water quality if they concentrate
and accelerate delivery of dissolved or suspended nutrient, salt, and pesticide
pollutants to surface or ground waters.
o. Waste utilization (633): Using agricultural wastes or other wastes on land in
an environmentally acceptable manner while maintaining or improving soil and plant
resources.
Waste utilization helps reduce the transport of sediment and related pollutants to the
surface water. Proper site selection, timing of application and rate of application may
reduce the potential for degradation of surface and ground water. This practice may
increase microbial action in the surface layers of the soil, causing a reaction which
assists in controlling pesticides and other pollutants by keeping them in place in the
field.
Mortality and other compost, when applied to agricultural land, will be applied in
accordance with the nutrient management measure. The composting facility may be
subject to State regulations and will have a written operation and management plan if
SCS practice 317 (composting facility) is used.
p. Composting facility (317): A facility for the biological stabilization of waste
organic material.
The purpose is to treat waste organic material biologically by producing a
humus-like material that can be recycled as a soil amendment and fertilizer substitute
or otherwise used in compliance with all laws, rules, and regulations.
q. Commercial rendering or disposal services
r. Incineration
s. Approved burial site
The construction costs for
large units (Table 2-11) also apply to this measure. The annual operation
and maintenance costs average 4 percent of construction costs for diversions, 3
percent of construction costs for settlement basins, and 5 percent of construction costs
for retention ponds (DPRA, 1992). Annual costs for repairs, maintenance, taxes, and
insurance are estimated to be 5 percent of investment costs for irrigation systems
(DPRA, 1992).
Return to Previous
Section
Continue to Next
Section
Return to the Table of Contents
This page last updated October 4, 1999
|