Water in the Tucson Area: Seeking Sustainabliity
ch. 5, pp.52 - 53
Previous Index Next

Chapter 5: THE MANY USES OF WATER
[continued]


WHAT MAKES UP TUCSON’S WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM?

Sources of Water - Water pumped from an aquifer to pipes for distribution and delivery has been the source of much of Tucson’s water. Tucson’s newest available source of water is the CAP, which brings water from the Colorado River. Tucson also has a system for using treated wastewater on facilities such as golf courses and parks.

Pipelines - Large pipelines (“water mains”) bring water from its source to central points, and smaller pipes distribute that water throughout the community.

Reservoirs - These are storage areas that hold water until used. Reservoirs are important for balancing supply and demand and for ensuring that an extra amount of water is in reserve for fire fighting. At one time, elevated storage tanks provided adequate supplies of water. With our large population, however, huge reservoirs are needed, with capacities ranging from one million to twenty million gallons of water.

Booster Stations - Since Tucson is not flat nor completely situated downhill from its water supply, booster pumps are needed to boost the water to higher elevations.


Many pools are not built at the same time as the home, but rather within the first seven to eight years after the home is constructed. And once constructed, pools are rarely removed. Pool removal can cost over $10,000 and usually reduces the value of the home. This suggests that the best time to provide outdoor water conservation messages to homeowners is soon after they’ve moved into a newly constructed home and before they have made landscaping and pool decisions.

One of the few ways to reduce pool water use is covering the pool when it is not in use to minimize evaporation. A survey of newer homes in Tucson revealed that approximately 60 percent of home pools have pool covers. But pool covers are used only about half the year. Usage is at a minimum during the summer swimming season to allow convenient and frequent access to the pool. Also covers are not used in the summer because they cause the water to become uncomfortably warm. Peak cover usage surprisingly is not in winter, but in the fall and spring, when pool users are trying to extend the swim season. Lower pool cover usage in the winter may reflect a desire to protect the cover from sun damage while evaporation rates are the lowest.

Water for evaporative cooling systems accounts for around five percent of outdoor water use in Tucson. (Evaporative cooling is classified as an outdoor water use because it results in water being consumptively used and not returned to the sewage system as is the case with other indoor uses.) In 1992, approximately 79 percent of homes in Tucson had evaporative coolers. At that time approximately 59 percent of households had only an evaporative cooler; 21 percent had both a cooler and an air conditioner; and 19 percent had only an air conditioner. As air conditioners have gained popularity in new construction, the percentage of Tucson homes with evaporative coolers, along with the amount of outdoor water devoted to evaporative cooling, has declined. Approximately 85 percent of new construction surveyed in 1996 had only an air conditioner, 11 percent had both an air conditioner and an evaporative cooler, and four percent had only an evaporative cooler.

HIGHER WATER USE TRENDS

While newer homes have more low-flow plumbing fixtures and appliances and are likely to have less turf and no evaporative cooler, some trends in new construction cancel out these conservation gains. For example, newer homes are more likely to have water using amenities such as pools, spas and whirlpool tubs. Further, new apartment complexes and condominiums are more likely to have large amounts of turf and landscaping, as well as pools.

The number of homes with outdoor misting systems grew through the early and mid-1990s. These systems spray droplets of water into the air that evaporate to cool an area. Although manufacturers of misting devices claim water efficiency, few residential misting systems are as effective or water-efficient as advertised, and some are poorly designed. System emitters can scale up or corrode, producing drips instead of the intended mists. A survey of Tucson Water customers in 1992 showed that three percent had misting systems. A Metro Water survey conducted about 1995 indicated that seven percent of homes had misting systems, and a 1997 survey of new housing indicated that 12 percent of sampled homes had them. The 1997 survey showed that those systems were used an average of 3.4 times per week, and that the main use was for cooling pets left outdoors.

The trend in cooling system design is toward greater water use. The latest models of evaporative coolers are designed to prolong the life of the cooler by draining water after a certain number of hours of operation. This prevents mineral content from building up and corroding metal cooler parts and scaling up the pads. Some new coolers, however, empty the pan automatically after only a few hours of operation. This is excessive considering Tucson-area water quality. In older coolers, water collects in the bottom of the cooler and can be drained using a bleed-off valve. Some new air conditioners also use water. Manufacturers can achieve higher efficiency ratings by dissipating heat generated by the unit in an attached evaporative cooler.

Some water-using indoor appliances also are starting to use more water in settings designed to handle heavy loads. For example, Consumer Reports found that while new dishwashers have a greater number of settings to better match water use with job size, the power-scrubbing option available on many models means significantly higher water use. New dishwashers use between four and 13 gallons per load on normal settings, but can use significantly more when set for the dirtiest loads. In contrast, washing dishes by hand uses three to five gallons per load.

WATER RATES AND CONSERVATION

For decades water has been priced as if it were free. What people pay for is the cost of capturing the water, delivering it to them and making sure it is safe to drink. People who pump their own water pay to build and operate their wells, but they do not pay anyone for the water itself. ADWR, however, does charge well owners a small pumping fee which goes primarily toward conservation and augmentation (water banking) programs. In some states people pay an annual fee for their pumping permit which recognizes that the state owns the water and sets certain conditions for people to use it.

Previous Index Next