Financial analysis: | |
Environmental impact analysis: | --- |
Waste management/P2: | --- |
Environmental cost listing/database: | |
Cost estimation: | --- |
Alternative product/process comparison: |
Eco-Accounting(SM) uses a three step approach. These steps are identifying environmental costs, establishing a set of performance measures, and analyzing strategic alternatives. Performance measures are based on a set of process and output measures. Alternatives are analyzed using cost and performance information. Product and process changes can be analyzed. Features of Eco-Accounting(SM) include the following.
Raw material acquisition | --- |
Manufacturing stage | |
Use/reuse/maintenance | --- |
Recycle/waste management |
The cost matrix includes information in five categories: strategic positioning, risk prevention, compliance, remediation, and disposal and claims.
Conventional | |
Potentially hidden | |
Contingent | --- |
External | --- |
Additional cost categories and cost information could be added using the customized software component of Eco-Accounting(SM).
Costs are identified through employee interviews in specific departments, project logs, operating statements, and general ledgers. The objective is to determine the time and money spent on significant environmental activities by broadly accounting for time and non-payroll expenditures of employees.
Net present value (NPV) | --- |
Payback period | --- |
Internal rate of return (IRR) | --- |
Benefits cost ratio | --- |
Other | --- |
Eco-Accounting(SM) permits benchmarking environmental costs by allowing users to determine and compare the time and money spent by different facilities and divisions for similar activities. Capital appropriation requests and environmental costs in product design can be evaluated. The software includes over 100 standard activities and 50 performance measures that users can choose from. The program consists of a series of Excel spreadsheets linked together.
This method does not reflect a way to change general company accounting practices. The accuracy of the results is dependent upon the proper identification of all key environmental activities and cost drivers. There is no information on methods for estimating contingent and external costs. These categories are not included in the original matrix. The program is not designed for life-cycle costing.
Return to the Table of Contents