Financial analysis: | |
Environmental impact analysis: | --- |
Waste management/P2: | |
Environmental cost listing/database: | --- |
Cost estimation: | --- |
Alternative product/process comparison: | --- |
This method compares pollution prevention options with current operating practices.
The method recommends including only those differential costs that would change if the pollution prevention opportunity was implemented. The method also recommends a scoring system risk analysis with considerations based on risks such as property contamination, compliance violations, health effects, accidents, and long-term disposal liability. The updated fact sheet does not discuss this. "Total cost" is calculated as the usual cost of running an industrial process plus the environmental costs such as compliance and oversight or management. The updated version of the fact sheet requires users to enter estimates of compliance and oversight costs.
Raw material acquisition | --- |
Manufacturing stage | |
Use/reuse/maintenance | |
Recycle/waste management |
The method considers raw materials acquisition, processing/manufacturing, transportation/storage/packaging, and waste management. The raw material acquisition stage is not check-marked, as our definition of this stage is different from the implication in this case. This is covered to the extent that product/vendor research is done. The updated version does not include waste management costs in the sample spreadsheet.
Conventional | |
Potentially hidden | |
Contingent | |
External | --- |
The method estimates conventional and hidden costs of inputs and outputs, and liability costs of outputs. Typical costs and activities are listed as follows:
Users estimated costs for activities. The following methods of estimation are recommended in the 1992 fact sheet:
Net present value (NPV) | |
Payback period | --- |
Internal rate of return (IRR) | --- |
Benefits cost ratio | --- |
Other | --- |
Instructions and tables on how to calculate the NPV are provided.
This method not only accounts for conventional costs, but also liability costs. Reduced risks are accounted for with a weighting system. The method in the 1992 fact sheet identifies risk factors, estimates their importance using a "risk score", and provides a way of using the results for decisions. High risks are weighted most heavily; unknown risks are given a "medium" score.
External (social) costs are not included in the analysis. The sample spreadsheet calculates the NPV for a 5 year project. This time frame may be too small for some environmental projects.
Return to the Table of Contents