NATURAL GAS FUEL CELL

Revision Date: 4/04
Process Code: Navy and Marine Corps: IND-023-12, IND-023-02, CON-002-99, IND-029-00; Air Force: IN07, FA01, FA05, IN01; Army: ELM, VHM
Usage List: Navy: Medium; Air Force: Medium; Army: Medium; Marine Corps: Medium
Alternative For: Fossil fuel combustion generators
Compliance Impact: Low
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents and CAS Numbers: N/A

Overview: The Natural Gas Fuel Cell (NGFC) is an emerging technology that uses an electrochemical process to generate electrical power using natural gas (or other fuel) as the fuel

Fuel cells can provide high quality power for a variety of uses. The fuel cell technology can save energy and power generation costs due to the high efficiency of the electrochemical process and by using low cost natural gas. Additionally, savings are generated by the production of supplemental heat, available in the form of hot water that can be applied to other industrial applications.

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) initiated the Fuel Cell Demonstration Program (FCDP) to determine the viability of the use of the natural gas fuel cell technology (particularly PAFCs) for DoD facilities and applications, as well as the role of fuel cells in the DoD's long-term energy strategy. The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL) was assigned the mission of managing the FCDP for the DoD. The program's goal was to develop the criteria necessary to evaluate the technology along with developing and implementing PAFC packages for DoD demonstration sites. Since 1993, DoD has appropriated $36.75 million dollars to the program.

Since 1995, under the FCPD, DoD has installed 30 stationary 200-kilowatt fuel cells at bases around the country. Heat from the fuel cells is used for boilers, domestic hot water, space heating, and process hot water. As of January 1999, the 30 fuel cells had saved a combined total of $2,704,711 in energy costs and abated 16,094 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2), 280 tons of sulfur oxides (SOx), 129 tons of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and 11 tons of carbon monoxide (CO).

The technology can be used wherever electrical power is required. Examples of sites and applications included under the DoD FCDP program include;

  • Hospitals MCB Camp Pendleton, CA
  • Central heating plants NETC Newport, RI
  • Galleys NAS Fallon, NV
  • Dormitories USNA Annapolis, MD
  • Administration facilities NAVO Stennis Space Center, MS
  • Swimming pools NCBC Port Hueneme, CA

CERL maintains a web site that contains a wealth of detailed information on fuel cell technology, the FCDP, the DoD installations, and many other resources for information on fuel cell technology and its implementation. This is the most comprehensive resource for information for DoD facilities interested in implementing fuel cell technology.

Although the fuel cell provides many advantages over combustion based power generation, the main barrier to widespread use is their cost. Although commercially available, PAFCs are still very expensive and the potential savings is dependent on many site- specific factors.

There are two programs currently in place that provide vehicles to potentially offset some of the costs associated with implementation of fuel cell technology. The Climate Change Fuel Cell Program is a DoD-funded program that provides grants to nonfederal agencies and organizations to install fuel cells. These grants can be used to offset some of the cost for implementation of the technology, thus giving facilities additional incentive to pursue this alternative.

The Air Emissions Reduction Credit Program allows DoD facilities to earn revenue from the sale or lease of air emission credits generated by reduction of air emissions below allowable levels. The revenue generated can be used for environmental programs, including the cost of implementing an emission reducing technology.


Compliance Benefit: The primary compliance benefit for fuel cell technology is the reduction or elimination of air emissions associated with the current combustion-based technologies. The reduction or elimination of these emissions may provide an opportunity for the facility to be removed from major source status under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (40 CFR 50). For example, the fuel cell exhaust emissions are exempted from air quality permitting requirements in California's South Coast and Bay Area AWMD and are well below any Federal, State, or local requirements. As a result, facilities located in non-attainment areas could potentially expand power generation capability without being subject to stringent New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) (40 CFR 60). Similarly, facilities located in attainment areas may be able to expand power generation capability without being subject to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements.

The replacement of the combustion generators with fuel cells reduces the generation of hazardous waste (generator lubricants and maintenance chemicals). This would reduce hazardous waste disposal costs and assist a facility in meeting the waste reduction requirements of RCRA (40 CFR 262) and Executive Order 13148.

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as general guidelines and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g., the amount of workload involved.


Materials Compatibility:


No materials compatibility issues were identified.


Safety and Health: The fuel cell technology, by replacing combustion generators, reduces the maintenance worker's exposure to chemicals used for lubrication and maintenance of the generators. However, personnel should consult local industrial health specialist, local health or safety personnel and any appropriate MSDS prior to implementing the technology.


Benefits:
  • More efficient than combustion technologies that produce cost savings for power generation.
  • Reduces or eliminates air emissions contributing to greenhouse gases.
  • Modular construction can be easily scaled up or down in size.
  • Distributed power generation reduces transmission losses.
  • Can be used for cogeneration of heat and power.
  • Can use a variety of fuels.
  • Reduces hazardous and controlled wastes generated by traditional combustion generators.
  • Lower maintenance costs.


Disadvantages: The main disadvantage to widespread use of fuel cells is their cost of implementation. The cost for installation and operation of a fuel cell plant can exceed $2,000 per kilowatt compared with $400-$800 per kilowatt for natural gas combined-cycle power plants.


Economic Analysis: The DoD Fuel Cell Demonstration Program web site provides detailed information with regard to the economic information generated from the demonstration program and sites. In general, the economics are difficult to itemize. The capital costs for installation of a 200KW unit is approximately $850,000, with potentially an additional $100,000 for installation of peripherals (depending on the site and application).

Savings are estimated at $50,000 to 60,000 per year in power generation costs, although those savings are dependent on the natural gas price differential. Additional savings are realized with heat recovery and are estimated at approximately $50,000 to $100,000 annually, depending on the application. Fuel cells require less maintenance than generators, which provides for approximately an additional $20,000 per year savings.

These numbers indicated above are estimated and the factors contributing to costs and savings at an individual site and application can vary dramatically. However, the payback period is thought to be very close to a 10-year simple payback.

Readers are encouraged to review the more detailed cost and economic analysis data for the specific sites and applications that are provided at the DoD Fuel Cell Demonstration website. This information can then be supplemented for comparison to your particular scenario.


Approving Authority: Appropriate authority for making process changes should always be sought and obtained prior to procuring or implementing any of the technology identified herein.


NSN/MSDS: None identified.


Points of Contact: For more information

All Joint Services
PAFC DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM SITES at http://www.dodfuelcell.com/links.php4#pafc

Additional Information Sources:
DoD Fuel Cell ERDC/CERL Programs website at: http://www.dodfuelcell.com/

Other Fuel Cell Related Sites at: http://www.dodfuelcell.com/links.php4#oth


Vendors: Refer to specific vendor and procurement information provided in the
Fuel Cell Developers Section of the DoD Fuel Cell ERDC/CERL Programs website at: http://www.dodfuelcell.com/links.php4#dev


Related Links: Do You Use Conventional Engine Driven Generators?, Navy Environmental Quality Initiative (EQI)


Sources: "Fuel Cells," January 2000, Climate Change Technology Newsletter, U.S. EPA State & Local Climate Change Program.
Gene Crank, NFESC.
DoD Fuel Cell Demonstration Program website.


Supplemental: Picture of 200KW Natural Gas Fuel Cell

Picture of 200KW Natural Gas Fuel Cell