![]() |
|
Overview: |
Cryogenic condensation is a process that allows recovery of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for reuse. The condensation process requires very low temperatures so that VOCs can be condensed. Traditionally, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) refrigerants like CFC-12 have been used to condense the VOCs, but with the phase-out of these ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), liquid nitrogen has emerged as a viable substitute for use in the extremely low-temperature or cryogenic (less than -160 degrees C) condensation process. Cryogenic condensation is best suited to exhaust streams with low flowrates (below 2000 standard ft3/min) and/or vapor concentrations above 100 parts per million on a volumetric basis (ppmv).
Cryogenic condensation is a versatile process that is not VOC specific. Typically, condensation takes place with liquid nitrogen as the refrigerant in a straightforward heat exchange process. Non-toxic, non-corrosive, and non-flammable, liquid nitrogen is a versatile, zero ODS coolant with a normal boiling point of -196 degrees C. As the organic-laden vapor stream is cooled, VOCs will condense when the dew point is reached. Fluctuations in VOC stream velocity or content are easily handled by quick response controls on liquid nitrogen injection. Typically, the only constraint on the VOC itself is that its freezing point should be below about -30 degrees C; otherwise, freezing is likely to occur. Cryogenic condensation systems generally consist of one or a series of plate-fin or shell-and-tube heat exchangers. The VOC stream and the liquid nitrogen stream flow through the heat exchanger countercurrently, maximizing heat transfer. The VOC condenses on the shell side of the exchanger then drains into a collection tank, from which it can be recycled, reclaimed, recovered for reuse, or, at worst, accumulated for disposal. During condensation, the presence of water vapor or VOCs with a high melting point can cause freezing on the external surface of the tubes inside a cryogenic condenser. A solid buildup will blanket the heat transfer area and thus reduce the efficiency of the process, unless suitable precautions are taken. One method of preventing buildup due to freezing is to periodically flush the pipes with the condensed phase. Another method is to use two condensers in parallel (continuous operation) so that one condenser is in operation while the other is out of service being cleaned or defrosted. Another option when excessive moisture is a concern is to arrange two condensers in series. In the first or pre-cooling stage, the VOC stream is cooled to about 1 degree C, condensing the majority of water so that it will not be present to freeze at condensing temperatures below 0 degrees C (system shutdown for defrosting might be required). In the second, or main, condensing stage, the temperature of the VOC stream can be lowered as needed to drop out the required/desired amount of VOCs without concern of ice formation. For some VOCs, substantial cooling -40 to -50 degrees C below the compound’s dew point may cause fog to form. Fog occurs when the rate of heat transfer exceeds the rate of mass transfer to the liquid stage, causing the bulk of the gas to quickly cool below its dew point. This causes the nucleation of tiny droplets of the VOC which, instead of coalescing and condensing on the surface of the tube, become a colloidal suspension in the bulk gas stream. The formation of fog, like the formation of solids, can be minimized by splitting the cooling process into steps, allowing better control of temperature changes. Other options to minimize fog formation include the use of a mist elimination device or reduction of the gas stream velocity by using a larger diameter inlet pipe. Air sweeps can sometimes be replaced with nitrogen sweeps to enhance the recovery of VOCs from the vent gas. Because the amount of VOC recovered is proportional to the fraction of VOC in the vapor (expressed as the partial pressure of the component), recovery rates are increased at higher vapor concentrations. For example, if a 5 percent concentration of VOC in a gas stream is technically feasible, but the vent stream concentration is controlled at 0.5 percent in air to eliminate the risk of explosion, that is, the concentration is controlled below the lower explosion limit (LEL), then the addition of nitrogen can render the atmosphere inert and at the same time allow a VOC concentration of 5 percent, without which the mixture would be explosive. Thus, VOC recovery is increased, while maintaining safe operating conditions. Cryogenic condensation has been selected as the Best Achievable Control Technology (BACT) by environmental regulators for VOC control in a few processes. |
|||||||||||||||
Compliance Benefit: | Replacing CFC-12 with liquid nitrogen
will help the facility meet the requirements under 40 CFR 82 and Executive
Order 13148 requiring federal agencies to maximize the use of safe alternatives to Class I and Class II ODSs. Reuse of VOCs may decrease the
amount of VOCs stored on site to below the applicable reporting thresholds of SARA Title III (40 CFR 355, 370, and 372; and EO 13148). In addition,
cryogenic condensation and recovery of VOCs may be considered a best available
control technology for a permit to construct under 40 CFR 51 and 52.
The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as general guidelines and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g., the amount of workload involved. |
|||||||||||||||
Materials Compatibility: | Because the VOC stream and the nitrogen stream never come in direct contact, virtually no material compatibility problems from a chemical standpoint are associated with the cryogenic condensation process. Heat exchanger materials of construction must, of course, be compatible with both streams and the low temperature operation. Typically, 316 stainless steel is used, since no carbon steel or cast iron is allowed in cryogenic service. |
|||||||||||||||
Safety and Health: | High pressure gases and cryogenic fluids should be handled with great care. Always chain or secure high pressure cylinders to a stationary support such as a column after moving, but before using. Always wear personal protective equipment when using cryogenic fluids, since exposure to skin could cause severe frostbite. VOCs should be used only in areas with adequate ventilation, in enclosed process equipment, or by personnel wearing the proper protective equipment (respirator or supplied air).
Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDSs prior to implementing this technology. |
|||||||||||||||
Benefits: |
|
|||||||||||||||
Disadvantages: |
|
|||||||||||||||
Economic Analysis: | Commercially available system capacities vary from small units handling 25 scfm of spent gas to large systems handling 10,000 scfm. Units with capacities greater than 500 scfm are custom designed and assembled on skids or a number of skids for transport. Typically, units 500 scfm and smaller are standard modules that are customized to the application. Approximate costs for essentially fully assembled cryogenic recovery systems are as follows:
Operating costs are relatively low, provided a ready source of liquid nitrogen is used at the site for some other purpose such as tank blanketing. Nitrogen demand depends on type of solvents, concentration desired, control efficiency, inlet temperature and pressure. For facilities with no continuous source of liquid nitrogen, several options are available:
A more meaningful economic analysis can only be done knowing the value of the VOC and the concentration, flowrate, and availability of liquid nitrogen at the facility. In certain cases, greater efficiency can be gained by designing the system for countercurrent contact of the streams using the cooling capacity of the “warm” liquid nitrogen from the main condenser to cool the incoming warm or ambient temperature VOC vapors in the pre-condenser. Assumptions: Cryogenic condensation technology using liquid nitrogen is not a fractionation process. It will condense essentially all the components of a vapor stream with the exception of elemental gases like hydrogen, helium, and neon, including gases as light as methane. Recovery and reuse of pure VOC streams from a cryogenic condensation system is the ideal application of this technology. However, VOCs are often released or captured as mixtures in large volume gas streams. Although the cryogenic condensation process will recover these materials, condensed mixtures are typically not easily separated even by subsequent reclamation. Another possibility for mixtures includes sale for another application that tolerates a mixture. Cryogenic condensation systems can also accommodate different VOC streams if production processes allow batches, e.g., single contaminant streams. To maximize purity and minimize cross-contamination, batches may have to be separated by purging and flushing of the system. |
|||||||||||||||
NSN/MSDS: |
*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs. The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example. To return from the MSDS, click the Back arrow on the Tool Bar. |
|||||||||||||||
Approving Authority: | Appropriate authority for making process changes should always be sought and obtained prior to procuring or implementing any of the technology identified herein.
|
|||||||||||||||
Points of Contact: | For more information |
Vendors: |
This is not meant to be a complete list, as there may be other manufacturers of this type of equipment. BOC Gases (formerly AIRCO) 575 Mountain Avenue Murray Hill, NJ 07974 Phone: (908) 464-8100 FAX: (908) 771-1672 Contact: Mr. Robert F. Zeiss (Phone: 908-508-3911) Service: Manufacturer of the Kryoclean™ Vapor Recovery Systems: Kryoclean™ units 500 scfm to 10,000 scfm and the Mini-Kryoclean™ units 25 scfm to 500 scfm. All units delivered ready to connect to utilities and process, minimum amount of assembly required. Controls with programmable logic controllers (PLCs). |
|||||||||||||
Related Links: |
None |
|||||||||||||||
Sources: | Environmental Engineering World, January/February 1995, pp. 26-29. Thomas, S. T., "Process Changes to Meet New Regulations," Proceedings of National Conference Minimization & Recycling of Industrial & Hazardous Waste ‘92, September 1992, pp. 89-91. |