BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL: BIOPILES

Joint Service P2 Opportunity Handbook small header logo
Revision Date: 7/02
Process Code: Navy/Marines: SR-99-99; Air Force: MI02; Army: OTG
Usage List: Navy: Low; Marines: Low; Army: Low; Air Force: Low
Alternative For: Excavation of contaminated soil and disposal as hazardous waste
Compliance Impact: Low
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: Trichloroethylene (CAS: 25323-89-1), Tetrachloroethylene (CAS: 127-18-4), Benzene (CAS: 71-43-2), Toluene (CAS: 108-88-3), Ethylbenzene (CAS: 100-41-4), and Xylene (CAS: 1330-20-7)

Overview: Biopiles are used to reduce the concentration of petroleum constituents in excavated soils through the use of biodegradation. This technology can be performed onsite and involves heaping contaminated soils into piles and stimulating aerobic microbial activity within the soils through the addition of oxygen, minerals, nutrients, and moisture. The enhanced microbial activity results in the breakdown of the petroleum constituents in the soil. The biopile technology requires the use of pumps to force air throughout the pile. To prevent the leaching of contaminants into underlying soil or groundwater, biopiles should be constructed in impermeable containers.

Many Department of Defense installations contaminate soil through petroleum spills during the maintenance and servicing of vehicles and aircrafts. Typically, the contaminated soil is excavated and disposed as hazardous waste. An alternative to this form of waste management implements a cleanup technology that would reduce or eliminate the amount of petroleum in the excavated soil, thereby making it suitable for reuse.

Selection of the proper cleanup technology should be based on the primary objectives of stopping the release of contaminants, recovering any free product, and preventing additional spills. The selection of the appropriate cleanup technology is a site-specific decision that will be fully protective of human health and the environment and meet site remediation objectives.

The Environmental Protection Agency suggests that biopiles is a proven technology effective in reducing nearly all of the concentrations of petroleum product constituents typically found in underground storage tank sites. Higher molecular weight petroleum constituents (e.g., heating and lubricating oils) require a longer degradation period. The effectiveness of a biopile system depends on the soil characteristics, petroleum constituent characteristics and climate conditions. A comprehensive site assessment must be performed before implementing any cleanup technology.


Compliance Benefit: Treating contaminated soils, rather than merely disposing of them, helps facilities to meet the goals of the Pollution Prevention Act (42 USC 13101-13109), which states that where pollution prevention or recycling opportunities are not viable, treatment of waste is preferable to disposal or other release into the environment.

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g., the amount of workload involved.


Materials
Compatibility:

No materials compatibility issues were identified.


Safety and Health: Care must be taken when handling contaminated soils. Proper personal protective equipment is recommended. Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits:
  • Relatively simple to design and implement.
  • Short treatment times: usually 6 months to 2 years under optimal conditions.
  • Cost competitive.
  • Effective on organic constituents with slow biodegradation rates.
  • Controlled vapor emissions when designed as a closed system.


Disadvantages:
  • Reduction of constituent concentration of greater than 95 percent and 0.1 parts per million (ppm) is difficult to achieve.
  • May not be very effective for high constituent concentrations of greater than 50,000 ppm of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH).
  • Presence of significant heavy metal concentrations, greater than 2,500 ppm, may inhibit microbial growth.
  • May require a liner if leaching from the biopile is a concern.


Economic Analysis: The following cost elements compare the off-site treatment of contaminated soil with implementation of the biopile system.

Assumptions:

  • 95,000 pounds of contaminated soil generated per year.
  • A 10 cubic yard (yd3) (1 ft3 of soil is 125 pounds) soil bin is used as the enclosed biopile system or used to haul away the contaminated soil to an off-site facility for treatment.
  • For off-site treatment : Cost of each 10 yd3 load is $500 for hauling, $265 for disposal, $130 for two TPH tests, and $550 for fish bioassay test (required if TPH is over 1,000 ppm).
  • For biopile system: Cost of each 10 yd3 load is $130 for 2 TPH tests, and $550 for fish bioassay test (required if TPH is over 1,000 ppm).
  • Equipment will include 10 yd3 soil bin and air pump.
  • Recurring costs will be incurred for PVC pipes and fertilizer.

Cost Comparison for Off-Site Treatment vs. Biopile System

 

Off-Site Treatment

Biopile System
Capital and Installation Cost: $0 $3000
Operational Costs:    
Hauling Fee: $1,407 $0
Disposal Fee: $746 $0
2 TPH Tests: $366 $366
Fish Bioassay Test: $1,548 $1,548
Recurring Supply Cost: $0 $1,000
Total Costs: (not including capital and installation costs) $4,607 $1,914
Total Income: $0 $1,000
Annual Benefit - $4,607 - $2,914

Economic Analysis Summary:

    Annual Savings for Biopile System: $1,693
    Capital Cost for Equipment/Process: $3,000
    Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: 2 years

Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values. To return from the Active Spreadsheet, click the reverse arrow in the Tool Bar.


Approving Authority: Appropriate authority for making process changes should always be sought and obtained prior to procuring or implementing any of the technology identified herein.


NSN/MSDS: None identified.


Points of Contact: For more information

Vendors: This is not meant to be a complete list, as there are other manufacturers of this type of equipment.

Clayton Group Services
7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 123
Pleasanton, CA   94588
Phone: (510) 426-2600

BioActive, Inc.
40 High Street
Mt. Holly, NJ   08060
Phone: (800) 328-2613


Related Links:

Multiple Biotechnology Demonstration of Explosives-Contaminated Soils

Picture of Bioremediation of Explosives - Contaminated Soil

Picture of Bioremediation of Explosives-Contaminated Soil


Sources: Growing International Markets and Opportunities in Bioremediation: Part 1, Glass, David J.; Raphael, Thomas; Valor, Risto; Van Eyk, Jack, Genetic Engineering News, October 15, 1995.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Underground Storage Tanks Homepage.