LASER DECOATING

Revision Date: 8/03
Process Code: Navy/Marines: IND-001-01; Air Force: ST01; Army: DPT
Usage List: Navy: Low; Marines: Low; Army: Low; Air Force: Low
Alternative For: Chemical stripping, media blasting, and hand sanding
Compliance Impact: High
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents and CAS Numbers: Toluene (CAS: 108-88-3), Xylene (CAS: 1330-20-7), Methyl ethyl ketone (CAS: 78-93-3), Acetone (CAS: 67-64-1), n-Butyl alcohol (CAS: 71-36-3), Lead (CAS: 7439-92-1), Chromium (CAS: 7440-47-3), Zinc compounds (No CAS), Phenol (CAS: 108-95-2), Chloroacetic acid (CAS: 79-11-8), Cyanide (CAS: 57-12-5), and Dichloromethane (CAS: 75-09-02)

Overview: Laser de-coating is a non-intrusive, non-kinetic energy process for removing organic coatings from a variety of substrates, including composites, glass, metal, and plastics. The high level absorption of energy at the surface of a coating material results in the subsequent decomposition and removal of the coating. Since the applied energy is mostly absorbed and utilized in coating decomposition (i.e., instant evaporation, which carries away most of the radiation energy), the substrate experiences only a minimal increase in temperature.

A laser de-coating system consists of a laser, beam delivery system, manipulation system, feedback control system, and waste management system. A laser is a device that generates very pure (monochromatic), coherent light that can be focused and concentrated into a narrow, intense beam of energy. Pulsed lasers use various methods to output photons in surges instead of continuously. In coating removal applications, short, intense pulses of laser energy quickly scanned over the surface volatilize coatings without damaging the substrate. Currently, most lasers used to remove organic coatings are transversely excited at atmospheric pressure (TEA) carbon dioxide (CO2) industrial lasers, emitting infrared light with a wavelength of 10.6 microns. The optimal energy level and pulse frequency of the laser beam depend on the type of coating to be removed.

The laser beam delivery system transfers the laser output to the work surface with the appropriate spot size and shape for delivering the energy density required for efficient coating removal. A manipulation system controls the position of the laser as it moves over the substrate surface, allowing each area to cool before being exposed to the beam again. An optional feedback control system allows the selective removal of primers, paints, topcoats, sealants, and other surface coatings.

As a coating is volatilized, decomposition by-products are thrown into the laser beam and incinerated to produce carbon dioxide, water, inorganic pigment ash, and trace amounts of other compounds. The organic constituents are exhausted into the atmosphere, and particulate matter is collected in conventional filters for future disposal. Therefore, the amount of waste to be disposed of represents only a fraction of the original coating volume.

Materials testing conducted by the NDCEE showed that laser decoating technology was effective at removing even the most difficult coatings, including powdercoats, electrocoats, chemical agent resistant coatings (CARC), and specialty coatings such as Rockhard stoving enamel. Removal rates vary between 5.8 and 17.5 ft2/hr (250-W system) and 46 and 140 ft2/hr (200-kW system). An automated laser decoating workcell system is currently being implemented in the NDCEE demonstration factory for further demonstration and testing.

Laser decoating is currently being used to strip radomes at Ogden Air Logistics Center (OO-ALC), Hill AFB, Utah. Corpus Christi Army Depot (CCAD), Texas, is also implementing an automated laser decoating system to strip composite helicopter rotor blades.


Compliance Benefit: The use of laser decoating systems reduces hazardous materials usage and hazardous waste for disposal by 100%. The only solid waste generated for disposal consists of the ablated inorganic particulates, which represents only a fraction of the volume of paint removed. All organics are converted to gases that can be exhausted directly to the atmosphere. The decrease in hazardous waste helps facilities to meet the requirements of waste reduction under RCRA, 40 CFR 262; the Pollution Prevention Act (42 USC 13101-13109); and Executive Order (EO) 13148; and may also help facilities reduce their generator status and lessen the regulatory burden (e.g., recordkeeping, reporting, inspections, transportation, accumulation time, emergency prevention and preparedness, emergency response).

In addition to hazardous waste reduction, facilities will decrease the amount of solvents on site and therefore, the possibility that a facility will meet any of the reporting thresholds for solvents under SARA Title III (40 CFR 300, 355, 370, and 372) and EO 13148 is significantly reduced.

Moreover, since solvents are not used, hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with the process are eliminated, which may lessen the likelihood that a facility will require an air permit under 40 CFR 70 and 71. Eliminating HAP and VOC emissions may also help a facility to comply with or avoid the requirements of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) (40 CFR 63).

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as general guidelines and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g., the amount of workload involved.


Materials Compatibility: Proper optimization of laser decoating systems allows control of the process to effectively strip even sensitive substrates without damage. As a result, this technology is applicable for removing organic coatings from composites, plastics, fiberglass, and metals.


Safety and Health: The use of Class C lasers requires the use of protective eyewear, and all operators should be properly trained.

Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits:
  • Reduced environmental impact from elimination of the use of hazardous chemicals and reduction of solid waste generated for disposal.
  • Reduced health and safety risks due to the elimination of exposure to hazardous chemicals and decoating residues.
  • Decreased operating costs due to reduced labor, materials use, damaged parts, and waste disposal costs.
  • Enhanced capability to apply advanced coating systems to a variety of metallic and non-metallic substrates by providing an efficient means to remove them.


Disadvantages:
  • High capital costs.
  • Few vendors of commercially available systems.
  • Line-of-site technology (although it can strip moderately contoured parts - up to approximately a 45-degree angle).


Economic Analysis: OO-ALC currently uses a laser de-coating system in their aircraft maintenance facility. The Laser Automated Decoating System (LADS) is used to remove epoxy and polyurethane coatings from aircraft radomes. The CO2 laser is attached to a robotic arm that can be programmed to adapt to a number of complex parts. Radomes are placed on a 65-foot lathe bed and rotated as the laser ablates and removes the coatings. The LADS laser operates at 70 kV and approximately 100 to 300 pulses/second at 30 J/pulse. The spot size is approximately 1.5 to 2 inches diameter. The following is a comparison of radome stripping using LADS versus conventional chemical stripping, based on actual observations.

Assumptions:

Laser Decoating Process

  • Process time to strip one radome: 2 to 3.5 hour laser strip followed by light sanding (9 flow days total)
  • Material usage for one radome: approx. 125 to 150 ft3 laser gas
  • Waste generated: less than a pound of solid (non-hazardous waste)

Chemical Stripping Process

  • Process time to strip one radome: 16 hour soak followed by hand sanding (31 flow days total)
  • Material usage for one radome: 25 gallons methylene chloride
  • Waste generated: 100 to 300 gallons hazardous waste

Capital Cost:
The capital cost for laser decoating will vary considerable depending upon the process configuration required for the particular stripping application. The capital costs for a laser decoating system for depot level maintenance activities was estimated at $0.5 million to $1.5 million.

  • Operational Cost:
    Operating costs for laser decoating will vary considerable depending upon the process configuration required for the particular stripping application. Operating costs for laser decoating of a radome are estimated at $4,000 per radome, as compared to $42,000 per radome for conventional stripping.

  • Payback Period:
    The estimated payback period for investment in the equipment/process: <5 years.

  • Annual Savings:
    Use of the LADS to strip radomes saves the facility approximately $700,000 annually in operating costs. This amount does not include the additional savings from reducing the number of scrapped parts. Using conventional stripping methods, an average of 10 radomes per year are scrapped due to substrate damage from extensive hand sanding. The LADS can also accommodate flat panel components, such as vent stabilizers, flaps, and body panels. Current efforts at OO-ALC are focused on programming the robot and setting up the LADS work cell to strip more flat panel components. These efforts will improve the LADS utilization rate, which is currently only 20 percent.

    Comparison of Radome Stripping Methods

      Chemical Stripping LADS
    Process time: 16 hour soak followed by hand sanding (31 flow days total). 2 to 3.5 hour laser strip followed by light sanding (9 flow days total).
    Materials usage: 25 gallons methylene chloride. approx. 125 to 150 ft3 laser gas.
    Waste generated: 100 to 300 gallons hazardous waste. less than a pound of solid (non-hazardous waste).
    Cost: $42,000 per radome. $4,000 per radome.

    CCAD is currently implementing a laser de-coating system to strip helicopter rotor blades (main and tail). This process has been approved for composite rotor blades provided that a color recognition system is used to selectively remove coatings down to the primer and the surface temperature does not exceed 170°F. The 2-kW, 200 Hz CO2 laser system has a robotic arm that moves along the rotor blade to remove topcoats and rain erosion coatings. Traditionally, rotor blade coating removal is done completely by hand sanding, which is very labor intensive and takes 8 to 15 hours. The laser system can strip an entire blade in 3 hours. CCAD anticipates that this will increase the throughput rate in the rotor blade shop by at least 30 percent.

    Economic Analysis Summary:

    • Annual Savings for the LADS: $700,000
    • Capital Cost for LADS: $1,000,000
    • Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: <5 years


  • NSN/MSDS:

    None Identified.


    Approving Authority:

    Appropriate authority for making process changes should a always be sought and obtained prior to procuring or implementing any of the technologies identified herein.

    The Army has approved the use of laser technology to strip composite rotor blades provided that a color recognition system is used to selectively remove coatings down to the primer. The Navy has authorized the use of lasers for removal of paint from Passive Counter Measure System (PCMS) materials installed on the topside structure of U.S. Navy surface combatants. The use of a laser has been approved by various weapon systems managers for use on radomes.


    Points of Contact: For more information

    Vendors:

    This is not meant to be a complete list, as there are other manufacturers of this type of equipment.

    SLCR Lasertechnik GmbH
    Willi-Bleicher-StraBe 11
    D-52353 Duren
    Phone: +49(0) 2421/ 91 50-0
    FAX: +49(0) 2421/ 91 50-0


    Related Links:

    None

    Sources: Concurrent Technologies Corporation. "Investigation of Laser Based De-Coating Technology. Final Report." March 12, 1999.