ODS-FREE SKIN REFRIGERANT
![]() |
|
Overview: |
The ozone depleting substance (ODS) CFC-114 has typically been used as a refrigerant spray for conducting cold-sensitivity studies at dental clinics. Alternatives are now available which utilize HFC-134a in place of CFC-114. Refrigerant sprays are applied by applying the refrigerant to a piece of cotton, then placing the cotton to the patient�s tooth. The dentist then observes the patient�s reaction and evaluates a course of action. These sprays are much colder than ice or ethyl chloride, at a temperature of approximately -20oC. These sprays have typically contained the ODS CFC-114, but now have been reformulated to incorporate HFC-134a instead. While not a class I ODS, HFC-134a is a green house gas and has a global warming potential. |
||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Benefit: |
Use of an ODS-free skin refrigerant will help facilities meet the requirements under 40 CFR 82, Subpart D and Executive Order 12843 requiring federal agencies to maximize the use of safe alternatives to class I and class II ozone depleting substances, to the maximum extent practicable. The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as general guidelines and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g., the amount of workload involved.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Materials Compatibility: |
No materials compatibility issues were identified.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Safety and Health: |
Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Benefits: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Disadvantages: | None
identified. |
||||||||||||||||||
Economic Analysis: |
The U.S. EPA is currently phasing out Applications of R-114. The following economic analysis is based on vendor information and compares the use of a skin refrigerant which uses R-114 (NSN 6506-00-576-8915), and an alternative that uses HFC-134a. Assumptions:
Annual Operating Cost Comparison for R-114 and HFC-134a
Economic Analysis Summary
Note: Although the cost of R-114 is currently lower than the alternative, since this Class I ODS is currently prohibited from production and importation, the cost will increase making the alternative more economically viable. Click
Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and
Enter Your Own Values. |
||||||||||||||||||
NSN/MSDS: |
*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs. The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example. To return from the MSDS, click the Back arrow on the Tool Bar. |
||||||||||||||||||
Approving Authority: |
Appropriate authority for making process changes should always be sought and obtained prior to procuring or implementing any of the technologies identified herein |
||||||||||||||||||
Points of Contact: | For more information |
||||||||||||||||||
Vendors: | This is not meant to be a complete list, as there may be
other suppliers of this type of equipment.
Coltene/Whaledent |
||||||||||||||||||
Related Links: |
None |
||||||||||||||||||
Sources: | None listed |