RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF HYDROFLUOROCARBONS
![]() |
|
Overview: |
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are being developed to replace
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) for use
primarily in refrigeration and air conditioning equipment. HFCs are the
next generation of refrigerants. They will substantially replace all the
CFCs and HCFCs, since they do not have ozone-depletion potential.
Under section 608 of the Clean Air Act, it has been illegal since November 15, 1995, to knowingly vent substitutes for CFC and HCFC refrigerants during the maintenance, service, repair and disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment. On June 11, 1998, EPA proposed a regulation to fully implement this statutory venting prohibition. In brief, the proposed regulations would:
Section 608 directly prohibits the venting of substitute refrigerants during the maintenance, service, repair, and disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment unless EPA determines that the release of the substitute does not pose a threat to the environment. EPA is considering a number of factors in making this determination, including the substitute's toxicity, flammability, long-term environmental impact (such as global warming potential), and regulation under other authorities (such as OSHA or other EPA requirements). Based on these considerations, the following refrigerants are subject to the venting prohibition, and EPA is proposing to cover them under the regulations:
EPA is proposing to exempt the following refrigerants from the venting prohibition:
This proposed exemption applies only to applications of these refrigerants that have been approved under EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program. The applicability of recycling requirements to these substitutes in other applications (e.g., hydrocarbons in household refrigerators) will be considered when the substitutes in those applications are submitted for SNAP review. It may be dangerous to use CFC and HCFC recovery equipment to recover ammonia, hydrocarbons, or chlorine. However, users of hydrocarbon, ammonia, and pure chlorine refrigerants must continue to comply with all other applicable federal, state, and local restrictions on emissions of these substances. As is the case for CFC and HCFC refrigerants, only four types of releases of HFCs and PFCs are permitted under the prohibition:
|
Compliance Benefit: |
None noted. 40 CFR 82, Subpart D and Executive Order 13148 require
federal agencies to maximize the purchase and use of safe alternatives to Class I and
Class II ozone-depleting substances.
The compliance
benefits listed here are only meant to be used as general guidelines and
are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will
vary depending on the factors involved, e.g., the amount of workload
involved.
|
Materials Compatibility: | No material compatibility
issues were identified.
|
Safety and Health: |
Consult your local industrial health
specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate
MSDS prior to implementing any of these technologies.
|
Benefits: |
|
Disadvantages: |
|
Economic Analysis: | Any replacements need to
be evaluated for a given application in order to determine the economic
impact. Regardless of any substitute’s cost, taxes on CFCs will continue
to rise.
|
NSN/MSDS: | None identified.
|
Approving Authority: |
Appropriate authority for making process changes
should always be sought and obtained prior to procuring or implementing any of the technology identified herein.
|
Points of Contact: | For more information |
Vendors: |
None identified.
|
Related Links: |
None
|
Sources: |
http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608/subrecsm.html http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608/608fact.html http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608/index.html Mr. Peter Mullenhard, June 2002. |