ELECTROCOATING
Revision Date: 4/03
Process Code: Navy/Marines: IND-005-99, IND-005-003; Air Force: PA01; Army: PNT
Usage List: Navy: Low; Marines: Low; Army: Low; Air Force: Low
Alternative For: Solvent-Borne Painting, Spray Painting
Compliance Impact: Not applicable
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents and CAS Numbers: Acetone (CAS: 67-64-1), n-Butyl alcohol (CAS: 71-36-3), Lead (CAS: 7439-92-1), Methyl ethyl ketone (CAS: 78-93-3), Toluene (CAS: 108-88-3), Xylene (CAS: 1330-20-7)


Overview: Electrocoating, which is also referred to as electrodeposition, electrophoretic deposition, or electropainting, is an organic finishing process that uniformly applies thin-film primers and one-coat finishes to metallic substrates. Electrocoating resembles electroplating in that it utilizes an electric current to deposit a coating onto substrates. However, electrocoating deposits waterborne paint onto substrates rather than metal ions. The overall process consists of four main process steps: pretreating, electrocoating, rinsing, and baking.

Substrate surfaces are commonly prepared for electrocoating by cleaning, conversion coating, sealing, drying, and cooling. During electrocoating, an electrical charge (direct current or DC) is applied to during immersion in a waterborne paint bath. During the process, the part becomes the cathode (in cathodic e-coat baths) and there are a number of anodes spaced evenly throughout the tank. Paint molecules then travel to the substrate and adhere to the surface. Adequate bath agitation is necessary during the process to prevent bath separation and to ensure a uniform concentration of bath constituents. Coating thickness can be precisely controlled, and is dependent on immersion time, bath temperature, process voltage, and bath chemistry. Substrates are typically immersed for 90 to 360 seconds at a bath temperature between 60 to 80°F (15 to °C). The DC power supply voltage typically ranges from 90 to 500V.

The electrocoating process may be anodic or cathodic, depending on the charge applied the substrate. Although the processes are virtually the same, properties of the resultant coating are dissimilar. Anodic systems, which were the first to be used for electrocoating, apply paint to positively charged substrates. The negatively charged pigment and resin particles deposit onto the substrate (anode). One disadvantage of this process is that substrate metals dissolve and become incorporated into the coating, which affects surface properties. Cathodic electrocoating deposits paint onto negatively charged substrates and offers several advantages over anodic electrocoating. For example, metal dissolution of the substrate does not occur, cathodic electrocoating has the ability to deposit over contaminants, corrosion resistance is improved, and a better color consistency occurs over welded areas.

After the electrocoating process is complete, excess paint is removed from the substrate by immersing or spraying the part with a permeate rinse (consisting of the ultrafilter permeate of the e-coat bath itself) and then a DI water rinse. The rinse is collected and separated to recover paint and recycle a portion of it back to the electrocoating bath.

After the coated substrates have been rinsed, they are then baked to cure and cross-link the coating. Baking is typically performed with a gas-heated convection oven, although some industries employ fresh-air-type heaters. Baking temperatures are commonly between 250 to 375°F with a baking time between 15 to 30 minutes.

Because of the uniformity of the applied coating, and excellent adhesion properties, the corrosion protection offered by e-coat systems is extremely high on both steel and aluminum substrates. Virtually all automobile manufacturers currently utilize an e-coat primer prior to application of the standard automotive paint finish. Corrosion testing performed by the National Defense Center for Environmental Excellence (NDCEE) has demonstrated exceptional performance when used as a primer in combination with both aerospace and chemical agent resistant coating (CARC) topcoats.

The DOD specification for electrocoat primers is MIL-P-53084. The material is also approved for CARC systems.


Compliance Benefit: Electrocoating reduces or eliminates volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), and the generation of hazardous waste associated with conventional solvent spray application. The reduction or elimination of VOCs and HAPs may allow a facility to avoid regulation under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) and/or related air pollution regulations at the federal, state, and local levels, including requirements under the Clean Air Act Title V Operating Permit Program.

Electrocoating materials may contain a low percentage of VOCs and HAPs. As a result, some electrocoating baths must be disposed of as hazardous waste and process wastewater may require treatment. However, with approximately 97 percent of the paint adhering to the substrate, electrocoating reduces the generation of hazardous waste normally associated with overspray in conventional spray paint operations through increased transfer efficiency. The decrease in hazardous waste helps facilities meet the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) waste minimization requirements applicable to generators of hazardous waste, found at 40 CFR 262. Lower levels of hazardous waste generation may also help facilities reduce their generator status and lessen the number of applicable regulatory requirements, such as those covering recordkeeping, reporting, inspections, transportation, accumulation time, emergency prevention and preparedness, and emergency response.

Furthermore, when compared to conventional solvent spray application, electrocoating may reduce worker exposure to hazardous constituents, as regulated by 29 CFR 1910.

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as general guidelines and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g., the amount of workload involved.


Materials Compatibility: Electrocoat can only be applied to metallic substrates. The use of cathodic electrocoat eliminates potential problems of substrate dissolution encountered with anodic methods.


Safety and Health: Electrocoating tanks should be enclosed to prevent accidental access to the high voltage areas. Confine any vapors generated during the process and minimize contamination of the paint. Since electrocoating is a water-based process, fire hazards are minimized.

Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits:
  • Reduced environmental impact associated with hazardous solvents and solid/hazardous waste generation and disposal.
  • Applies a uniform coating of pre-determined thickness over parts with simple or complex geometries, including sharp edges and points.
  • Eliminates runs and sags common with conventional dip or spray application.
  • Can be used as an epoxy primer for most liquid or powder topcoats.
  • Offers many desirable coating characteristics, such as protection against abrasion, corrosion, and wear.


Disadvantages:
  • Limited to one-coat application.
  • Different colors require different processing tanks.
  • Penetration of electrocoat material to the inside diameter of a tube may not be feasible.
  • Ventilation is required until coated parts cool to 150°
  • The part and conveyor carrier must be isolated from electrical ground.
  • A chiller is required to maintain bath temperature.
  • A technician is required to check the electrocoat tank daily.
  • Maintenance is required for ultra filters, 10 micron and 25 micron bag filters.
  • Deionized water with an ultraviolet water treatment system is required.
  • Analyte waste water is generated.
  • The periodic flushing of ultra filters will generate wastewater sludge.


Economic Analysis:

The National Defense Center for Environmental Excellence, which is operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation (CTC), was tasked by the Department of Defense to investigate alternative painting processes that have the potential to perform as effectively and efficiently as conventional spray paints. One of the alternative processes that was evaluated was electrocoating.

The NDCEE demonstrated electrocoating for numerous ground vehicle, aircraft, missile, and weapon systems applications. Electrocoat materials met current performance requirements while reducing or eliminating the use of hazardous materials and resultant volatile chemical emissions.

A comparison of the costs for electrocoating versus conventional solvent painting is shown in Table 1. No detailed economic analysis has been performed.


Assumptions:

  • 12,000,000 ft2 annual coverage
  • 1.0 Mil film thickness

    Electrocoating Process

    • Paint purchase cost: $16.50/gal
    • Coverage @ 1.0 Mil @ 100% efficiency: 996 ft2
    • Application efficiency: 97%
    • Applied cost: $0.0171/ft2 covered

    Solvent-Borne Spray Painting Process

    • Paint purchase cost: $9.75/gal, reduced 3:1 with solvent costing $1.55/gallon
    • Coverage @ 1.0 Mil @ 100% efficiency: 561 ft2
    • Application efficiency: 60%
    • Applied cost: $0.0228/ft2 covered
Capital Cost:
    The capital costs for an electrocoating system varies depending on the system configuration, but is generally in the range of $0.5 million to $1.5 million.

Operational Cost:

    Paint purchase costs are the major operational cost element for most painting processes. Paint costs for an electrocoating system are estimated at $205,200 per year, versus $273,600 per year for conventional solvent paint. Adding in other operational costs (labor, energy, disposal, etc.) brings the total annual operating cost for electrocoating to $363,200 per year, versus $439,800 per year for conventional painting. Table 1 compares the various operational costs for electrocoating versus conventional solvent painting.

Table 1: Annual Operating Cost Comparison for Electrocoating and Conventional Solvent Painting at 12M ft2 per Year

Operational Cost Category

Dollars per Year

Electrocoating

Solvent Painting

Material:

$205,200

$273,600

Labor & Clean-up:

$59,000

$118,000

Maintenance:

$17,000

$17,000

Energy:

$22,000

$21,200

Disposal:

$10,000

$10,000

Depreciation (10 Yrs – Straight Line):

$50,000

$--

Total Operational Costs:

$363,200

$439,800

Net Annual Savings:

$76,600


Payback Period:

    The calculated payback period for investment in the equipment/process: <8 years (basis: $0.5M system with $0.1M installation cost)

Annual Savings:

    The calculated annual savings for electrocoating: $76,600

Economic Analysis Summary:

    Electrocoating reduces operating costs through a reduction in raw material costs, waste disposal, permitting, and emissions control requirements.

    However, it should be noted that this particular economic analysis was performed for a high-volume production facility. Facilities processing a relatively small amount of parts per year may have significant difficulty in justifying an e-coat system. This is due to the high fixed costs (capital and operating) associated with e-coat.

    In general, e-coat is one of the most cost-effective technologies available when a high-volume production line is considered. Small job -shops and other facilities processing a low annual amount of square footage coated will see a higher cost per unit surface area.


NSN/MSDS: None Identified


Approving Authority: Appropriate authority for making process changes should always be sought and obtained prior to procuring or implementing any of the technologies identified herein.


Points of Contact: For more information

Vendors: This is not meant to be a complete list, as there may be other suppliers of this type of equipment

KMI Systems, Inc.
4704 Three Oaks Rd.
Crystal Lake, IL 60014
Tel: (815) 459-5255

PPG Industries
961 Division Street
Adrian, MI 49221
Tel.: (517) 263-7831

Sybron Chemicals Inc.
Birmingham Rd., P.O. Box 66
Birmingham, NJ 08011-0066
Tel: (800) 678-0020


Sources: None listed.


Supplemental: Picture of electrocoating metal panels being rinsed