Barbara C. Lippiatt
NIST, Building and Fire Research Laboratory
Office of Applied Economics
100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8603
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8603
Phone: 301-975-6133
FAX: 301-975-5337
E-mail: blippiatt@nist.gov
Mike Levy
Environmental Strategies & Solutions
744 Ridge Drive
McLean, VA 22101
Phone: 703-790-3245
FAX: 703-790-3245
E-mail: envstrsol@erols.com
Vince Camobreco
Ecobalance, Inc.
7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 700
Bethesda, MD 20814
Phone: 301-657-5943
FAX: 301-657-5948
E-mail: vincent_camobreco@ecobalance.dames.com
BEES measures environmental performance using the environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach specified in the latest versions of ISO 14000 standards. All stages in the life of a product are analyzed: raw material acquisition, manufacture, transportation, installation, use, and recycling and waste management. Economic performance is measured using the ASTM standard life-cycle cost method, which covers the costs of initial investment, replacement, operation, maintenance and repair, and disposal. Environmental and economic performance are combined into an overall performance measure using the ASTM standard for Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis. Through synthesis of these standard methods, BEES reduces complex, science-based technical content (e.g., over 100 material and energy flows from raw material extraction through product disposal) to decision-enabling results and delivers them in a visually intuitive graphical format.
This paper will present the methodology behind the BEES tool as well as the approach for collection of environmental LCA and cost data for building products. The LCA data comes from a combination of data collected specifically for the BEES system from industry stakeholders and data from a premier LCA database, Ecobalance, Inc.'s DEAM LCA database on materials and processes. Cost data is collected from widely-used published cost data sources.
Several case studies and a description of the publicly-available, free software will be presented.
Sabrina Spatari
PE-Americas
PMP # 265 1554 Paoli Pike
West Chester, PA
Phone: 1-888-222-1451
E-mail: s.spatari@pe-americas.com
Andrea J. Russell
Five Winds International
GaBi 3 software for Life Cycle Engineering provides graphical
representation of product systems, including Sankey diagrams that
represent flows between unit processes according the quantity
of the flow.
GaBi 3 contains numerous life cycle impact assessment tools, each with transparent scoring and weighting capabilities.
GaBi 3 offers powerful sensitivity analysis tools that allow the LCA practitioner to examine how variations in specific parameters affect environmental impacts.
Remi Coulon and Anne Landfield
Ecobalance, Inc.
7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 700
Bethesda, MD 20814
Phone: (301) 657-5940
FAX: (301) 657-5948
E-mail: remi_coulon@ecobalance.com
Nevertheless, it is often difficult to incorporate LCA into a company's infrastructure. The many aspects of an LCA can cover the entire corporate structure, from scoping and carrying out the LCA through interpreting and utilizing the results. Performing an LCA often requires data collection input from various departments, including purchasing (raw material and energy requirements), health and safety (emissions data), and engineering (for process modeling). Results of an LCA are oftentimes interpreted by different segments of a corporate structure, including marketing, design teams, and executive levels. Therefore, the flow of information across and through all the departments complicates the task of incorporating LCA.
TEAM, Tool for Environmental Analysis and Management, is a professional software tool used to evaluate the life cycle environmental and cost profile of products and technologies, facilitating the flow of life cycle information through the infrastructure. A company's existing data can be incorporated into TEAMTM to simplify the task of performing LCA's, and allows companies to integrate the LCA approach into the enterprise. For example, TEAM manages life cycle data input through its ability to import existing company databases and public data sources with simple macros and filters. Furthermore, electronic questionnaires have been developed that allow site data to be uploaded directly into a TEAM model.
Once the data is incorporated, process modeling in TEAM is flexible and allows unlimited levels of process models, systems, and sub-systems. This unique encapsulation or nesting feature (grouping several models in a sub-system) allows one to build complex systems while keeping the interface simple (In fact, the largest system built to date gathered approximately 1,900 process models in eight layers of nested sub-systems).
TEAM also helps to manage the analysis and reporting of life cycle information for various levels of users. Experts can adjust system parameters and run what-if scenarios, as well as compute assessments with the built in database of accepted life cycle impact assessment methods. Users can also define and calculate their own user-input categories. Control panels can be built for non-LCA experts to gain the advantage of using LCA information without an in-depth knowledge of LCA methodology.
Furthermore, the TEAM software is well positioned for the future of LCA data management where information from other company-wide software tools (e.g., inventory tracking software, CAD programs, etc.) could be downloaded into TEAM, and LCA results could be automatically produced to aid in decision making and optimization of designs. This concept is being demonstrated through work being performed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology through their DOME project.
The ability of TEAM to act as a life cycle information manager not only simplifies and enhances the use of LCA on a corporate level, but also organizes and optimizes the use of valuable environmental data.
Mark Goedkoop
Renilde Spriensma
PRé Consultants, B.V. Plotterweg 12
3821 BB Amersfoort; The Netherlands
Phone: +31 33 4555022
FAX: +31 33 4555024
E-mail: goedkoop@pre.nl
As a result of this choice three damage models were developed to connect the inventory results to impact categories and further on to the damage categories. This means virtually all commonly known impact categories had to be redeveloped.
In the development of damage models it is impossible to avoid value choices, regarding time perspective and other modeling parameters. In order to deal with such choices a management system was set up that resulted in the development of three versions, each representing a consistent set of value choices, using the principles of Cultural Theory.
The methodology development was sponsored by the Dutch Ministry of Environment and the Swiss National Science Foundation. A large team of experts from several countries has contributed.
The method can be seen as one of the most sophisticated damage approaches for LCA to date. Although the development of the method was complicated, the application is simple and the method can be easily implemented in the worlds most widely used LCA software SimaPro, also developed by PRé. Furthermore a short presentation of a very easy to use tool (ECO-it) for designers is demonstrated.
Mary Ann Curran
LCA Data Team Leader Phone: 513-569-7782
U.S. EPA, NRMRL
E-mail: curran.maryann@epa.gov
Timothy J. Skone
SAIC
LCAccess is an EPA web site designed to address all three of these areas! It's aim is to reduce the time and resources burden to locate existing LCI data sources by cataloguing existing LCI data sources and documenting the quality of each in a searchable database tool.
The LCI Data Locator portal allows the user to select a predefined data set from a matrix search that is organized by industry categories and life cycle stages, or specify a search criteria using a combined keyword search and advanced criteria search. Once selected, Data Source Profiles can either be viewed on the Internet, printed, or used to link to the location of the data source (if available on the Internet).
Another unique feature of the web site is that it allows users to add their own information directly to the database by using a standard form provided on the web site. This way the web site will contain the most recent sources of LCI data. Another important benefit of this feature is that it allows users to market their data to a wider audience.
Jane C. Bare
U.S. EPA
26 W. MLK Dr., (MS-466)
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Phone: 513-569-7513
FAX: 513-569-7111
E-mail: bare.jane@epa.gov
Gregory Norris
Sylvatica, Inc.
147 Bauneg Hill Road, Suite 200
North Berwick, Maine 03906
Phone: 207-676-7640
FAX: 207-676-7647
E-mail: norris@sylvatica.com
TRACI
is a screening level impact assessment tool which can assist in
environmental decision making for implementation of pollution
prevention, life cycle assessment, or sustainability programs
and which can allow further prioritization of environmental problems
for further action or more in-depth analysis. TRACI provides extensive
documentation to assist practitioners in understanding the advantages
and disadvantages of various study designs, and includes impact
assessment methodologies and supporting databases to allow a screening
level assessment of potential impacts in the following impact
categories:
Potential impacts may be maintained independently, or may be aggregated utilizing the normalization and valuation processes for a consistent decision making framework. A sensitivity analysis of the valuation process may also be conducted.
For three of these categories - acidification, smog formation, and eutrophication - U.S. average and sometimes, more geographically specific, equivalency factors are being developed with a probabilistic approach allowing quantification of uncertainty related to impact assessment calculations. Impact assessments allowing more specific scenario differentiation will reflect the increased level of certainty in the analyses.
U.S. average equivalency factors for the final two impact categories - human and environmental health - will be developed using selected parameters chosen to represent the geographic and meteorologic diversity of the U.S. incorporated into the CALTOX model. CALTOX uses a multimedia modeling framework allowing the assessment of various scenarios for human exposure. Analyses to date have shown that U.S. average chemical potencies are sufficient when compared to the uncertainty introduced in other parts of the uncertainties involved in the modeling.
Impact assessment methodology and equivalency factor development is expected to be completed near the end of 1999, followed by software beta testing in early 2000.
Yasuhiro Fukushima and Masahiko Hirao
Department of Chemical System Engineering
E-mail: fuku@pse.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
School of Engineering
E-mail: hirao@chemsys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
The University of Tokyo
7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 113-8656 Japan
Product lifecycle evaluation consists of three major activities. First, product lifecycles of every raw materials, utilities, and products relevant to the target process must be modeled. Then, inventory data are collected or estimated. Finally, whole lifecycle systems are evaluated and the results are returned to the process design activities.
In this paper, a new information system, which supports product lifecycle evaluation in the course of process design activities, is presented. A new application framework to exchange services on a network is constructed using distributed object technology. Lifecycle modeling, inventory data supply, and various environmental impact calculations are treated as services whose interfaces to the network is standardized in the framework. Services are provided by software located at the developer (including databases at the maintainer) side in the network. Users of this framework, i.e. process design engineers, can build their own lifecycle evaluation systems to meet their design strategies using the services on the network. Therefore, they can obtain up-to-date data and can use a new evaluation method as a part of their system without developing it from the very beginning. So far, collection or estimation of inventory data in the lifecycle systems is a time and cost consuming issue, because activities in a product lifecycle are carried out not by a single company but by many companies, governmental agencies, and the citizens. Although several software tools for lifecycle evaluation already exist, evaluation methods are fixed and cannot be modified by users. Data formats are not exchangeable among the tools and data collection is not supported in most cases. The information system developed over this framework helps process design engineers model product lifecycles, collect data from distributed heterogeneous databases, and evaluate the target process within the product lifecycle system using any impact indicator they want. The functionality of the system will be introduced through case study on a new process system evaluation, as well as the potential of the application framework to change from software-based paradigm to service-based paradigm.