Impacts of Odor and the Unknown Truth: A Comparison
of Air Quality: The Large Scale Lagoon System to
Swedish Style and Hoop House Models for Raising Swine
Julie Jansen
Mother, Rural Resident
In the fall of 1994 two large-scale swine operations
with lagoon systems were built south of my home. In March of 1995 my family and neighbors
started to experience health effects such as headaches, blacking out, nausea, coughing,
lung congestion, bloody noses, leg cramps, body aches dizziness, stomach cramps and
diarrhea just to list a few, as the months rolled on we remained seriously ill off and on.
On July 4, 1995 the odor in our home was so ungodly I could not believe it. Doors and
windows shut and air conditioning running and still the sewer gas smell was unbearable.
Every one in my home was ill once again. I now know that we were being fooled with masking
agents [9]. Masking agents reduce and even take away our sense of smell away but our body
still reacts to the chemical reaction of the gases present in the cloud of gases hovering
over us called a plume. At the request of a neighbor who was also experiencing health
problems I called the Minnesota Poison Control Center and inquired about Methane and
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S). My neighbor and I had prepared a list of symptoms that both our
households were experiencing. I asked if these chemicals could cause these symptoms. I was
told that H2S would. I asked what else H2S could do, I was told the only symptoms we were
not experiencing were seizures, convolutions and death [6, 7, 8, 14, 15, 16]. This phone
call has lead me down a 2 1/2 year search for the truth and justice. After many phone
calls to the Mn. Department of Health (MDH) and the Mn. Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA) I
realized I needed to search for the truth myself, because neither Department had the
answers.
After almost a year of research and pleading for air quality testing, I
knew that if any meaningful testing was going to be done the citizens would have to do it.
With the help of many new found friends, including a micro biologist and an environmental
consultant, we conducted the first ever in Minnesota citizens monitoring effort.. We
rented a 631x Jerome gold film H2S monitor from Arizona Instruments. We showed that 25% of
the 17 large-scale swine lagoon facilities in Renville County were possibly exceeding the
Minnesota air quality standards [2] on the days-tested [1].
The MDH reviewed the citizens data and recommended that all facilities
with levels over 50 ppb reduce there emissions [1]. MDH concluded that the levels found
were not a health emergency but would cause the symptoms of nausea, headaches, irritation
to eyes, throat or respiratory system especially in children and people with underlying
health problems, like asthma. On July 1, 1996 levels reached as high as 1,400 parts per
billion (ppb) with a hour average of 163.23 ppb in my yard. This was significant to show
actual human exposure.
The MPCA wrote letters to two of the feedlots with odor contingence
plans and requested that they reduce their emissions. The letter stated that not only were
they creating an on going nuisance odor they were according to the MDH a potential health
concern. I thought our nightmare would end here, but of coarse it did not.
The Attorney Generals office and MPCA called a meeting and informed us
that we were an embarrassment to the agency. While we did a great job and should be
commended, The H2S standard was old and out dated, and they were not going to enforce the
standards unless the legislators told them to.
With out much hope for it to happen, we wrote a bill to force the MPCA
to enforce the air quality standards of the state and to do their job. It was not easy but
we passed and the Governor signed the bill.
Our Attorney General has called for a statewide moratorium on feedlots.
Four of the DFL Governor Candidates support some type of feedlot moratorium. Our Governor
has called for a generic environmental impact study to be done on feedlots. Things are
starting to happen but it has been almost three years and an every day struggle. At the
county level we are writing a feedlot odor ordinance. From not being believed to these
steps is an improvement. What ever we accomplish we have at least started to pave the path
for the next generation.
In the coarse of this battle I have gained great knowledge of what the
family farm/ factory farm battle is all about. I have learned about sustainable and
organic farming practices. I believe there is a neighbor friendly safe way to raise
livestock. I testified for and supported a bill which included research and development of
low energy low emission livestock systems. I have testified in many counties and states on
behalf of citizen groups like mine that are fighting for their rights to clean air and a
healthy environment.
I was taken back when I received a call asking to fight a hoop house
system. This is when I realized that citizens were starting to have a phobia of any type
of hog raising system. I did not want this to happen. The livestock industry is an
important asset to our family farms, community and state. I wanted to help prove that
there was a safe way to raise livestock and help promote these systems. I spot tested for
H2S around and in a hoop house system and found that the levels in the hoop house were
extremely lower than what I found in my home and yard from the large livestock lagoon
systems 3/4 and 1 1/2 miles away from my home.
Feedlot odors are complex. In the past most feedlot odor was
contributed to land application [9]. Now with the trend of large live stock facilities,
odor has become a 365-day problem. In Renville County 102 odor complaints were logged with
in six months from large swine systems with lagoons [10]. Renville County created an odor
task force to investigate the problem. The task force consisted of two commissioners, two
farmers, the County Attorney and County Auditor. Their recommendation (March 14, 1995)
stated that odor is a real issue and at certain times and places it reached unreasonable
and unbearable levels and when present denies an unacceptable quality of life to those
subject to it, correction actions were recommended.
There are over 200 chemicals known to be in hog odor [5]. Many of them
are toxins. Many studies have been done on worker health in swine operations [3,4,7,14].
There is a significant pattern of respiratory effects among workers in swine operations.
Dusts, respirable dusts and respirable endotoxins, methane, and carbon dioxide are a
concern but the two gases that are the greatest concern are ammonia and H2S [3,4,6,7,9,14,18].
Hydrogen Sulfide
H2S is the most toxic gas associated with the decomposition of
swine manure. H2S is both an irritant and an asphyxiating gas.. H2S is a colorless, very
odorous and heavier the air. We know that the odor threshold starts at 1/2 ppb [5,6], 5
ppb to 10 ppb will start to cause health symptoms in some people [8, 12] some researchers
believe this maybe caused by environmental stress from odor [3,6]. H2S is absorbed into
the lungs by inhalation. Some researchers believe that H2S is quickly detoxified by the
bodies oxidizing mechanisms and is only toxic at high parts per million (ppm) [21, 22]
Other researchers believe that H2S is accumulative and no level is safe [ 15 ]. H2S leaves
the body through urine, bowel, and gas exchange [6]. Tolerance to H2S does not develop,
hypersensitivity is often noted after an exposure [22]. There are no studies on humans for
long term low level ppb H2S.
OSHA standards are 10 ppm for an 8-hour workday. This standard was
developed for protecting the eyes, using white healthy males ages 18 to 24. OSHA standards
were never intended to be used as legal standards or ambient air quality standards [16].
This level will not protect children or sensitive people.
A few studies claimed that H2S maybe a teratogentic and an embryotoxic
however Carbon Disulfide (CS2) was also present and well known to be associated with
increased toxicity of reproduction [21]. The horrifying part of this is that we did find
CS2 in every air bag sample that we have taken at large scale lagoon systems.
The common level of H2S in an environmentally controlled swine system
is 3 ppm to 5 ppm [7, 9]. In the deep straw system we found (using a 621x Jerome meter) a
1/2 hour average of .091 ppb. and the hoop house average was .182 ppb, both of
these systems 1/2 hour average was less than 1 ppb inside the barns. The lagoon system was
measured about 500 feet down wind and averaged 90.75 ppb.
Ammonia
Ammonia gas is an irritant, which is colorless, lighter than air
and has a sharp pungent odor. Ammonia causes irritation to eyes, nose, and respiratory
tract, swelling and narrowing of the throat, bronchi, coughing and fluid in the lungs [7,
9,17,18]. Waste lagoons and barns release large amounts of ammonia, which returns to earth
in rain, and can causes waterway pollution [18].
Typical levels in a well-ventilated environmentally regulated system
are 10 to 20 ppm. In winter with no ventilation rates can reach 100 to 200
ppm. 50 ppm and
over will increase pneumonia and other respiratory diseases in the hogs [7]. Inside the
deep straw system (using n = 5 Drager Tubes) we found a 1/2 hour average of 5.375 ppm of
ammonia. This barn was poorly ventilated to keep the barn warm for the piglets yet the
levels were in the normal range and way below winter levels. In the hoop house using the
same method and time frame we found an average of .6 ppm of ammonia very low for this time
of year. No ammonia or H2S was found immediately outside either of these systems. With the
lagoon system we found an average of .65 ppm about 500 feet down wind from the lagoon.
This level is also fairly low but we also must consider the test was not taken in the
building but in the ambient air.
The university of Minnesota has taken H2S readings off the surface of
lagoons, pitted barn fans and off the surface of out door storage systems (animal
operation size was not included). All three of these systems showed high levels up to 120
ppm leaving the surface [13]. This study showed that deep-pitted barns emitted higher
levels of H2S at the surface than lagoons. How these levels are dispersed over distance is
unknown.
The first-ever modeling effort was requested by the MPCA on a large
3000 sow deep pit operation. The modeling effort predicted that levels could reach 29 ppb
1/2 mile down wind under the worse weather conditions [11].
Raising hogs is a choice that a farmer chooses. I feel that the farmer
could also choose to wear protection such as a filter mask or respirator while working in
buildings. When the levels of pollution reach the ambient air and affect the neighbors'
quality of life and health it is not right. It is not the neighbors' choice to live like
this enduring pain, hardship and suffering for someone else' s profit. Farmers are leaning
toward the trend of large-scale systems. They could be putting up hoop houses for less
than $10,000 [20]. With less cash investment the return would be greater and with out the
hassle of:
- Trying to fix a system' s odor emissions with no sure cure
- Millions of dollars invested into a system
- Angry neighbors
- The environmental worries of water seepage, over flow, or mechanical failures
The hoop house and deep bed straw system are safer for the farmer,
animals, community and the environment.
A wonderful wise man once wrote [19]"The way exists. Is there the
will?"
References
Minnesota Department Of Health (July 16, 1996). Evaluation of
Results Citizen Testing For Feedlot Emissions (Hydrogen Sulfide). May 15 -31, 1996.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Chapter 7009, Ambient Air Quality Standards.
Minnesota Department of Health, Health And Environmental Concerns Associated With Swine
Feedlots (Feb. 2, 1996).
Donham, K.J. et al (1995) Respiratory Dysfunction In Swine Production Facility Workers:
Am. J. Indus: Med.27: 405-418.
DH O' Neil: VR. Phillips J. A Review Of The Control Of Odor Nuisance From Livestock
Buildings: Agric Engng Res. (1992) 53, 23-50
Schiffman, S. et al (1995) The Effect Of Environmental Odors Emanating From Commercial
Swine Operations On The Mood Of Nearby Residents: Brain Research Bulletin Vol. 37, No. 4
pp. 369-375.
J. Parker, S. Curtis, O. Hogsett. Pork Industry Hand Book, NC University Raleigh
Extension Service.
JE. Ammoore, California H2S Study, April 10, 1985
Richard E. Nicolai (June 30, 1995). Agricultural Engineering Up Date Dept. Of Bio
Systems and Agricultural Engineering.
Renville County Zoning Office, Complaint Log March 1995 through Sept.1995.
Charles Gantzer (July 28, 1997). Gantzer Environmental Software and Services, Gantzer
Modeling Effort.
Mn. Department Of Health (1996). Legislative Testimony Ag. and Environmental Hearing.
Larry Jacobson et al. Correlating Sulfur Sources and H2S Emissions From Pig Manure
Sources, University Of Mn.
M. Adcock and M. Finelli. Sensitive Pig Verses The Hostile Environment Of The Modern
Pig Farm: The Human Society Of The US, Spring 1996
Honolulu Adviser (Jan. 12, 1997). Exposure To Fumes A Hazard.
NIOSH. A Recommended Standard for Occ. Exposure to H2S,
U.S.Dept. Of Health, Education,
And Welfare.
ATSDR General Inf., Case 7664-41-7; UN 2672 Ammonia Health Effects.
US News and World Report, Jan 22, 1996, Hog Heaven and Hell.
J. Ronald Miner. Alternatives To Minimize the Environmental Impacts of Large Swine
Production Units.
Mn. Department Of Agriculture. Energy And Sustainable Agriculture Program; 1997 Green
Book.
RJ Reiffenstien et al (1992). Toxicology of H2S:
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol, 109-34.
TH. Milby (1962). Case Report H2S Intoxication: Occupational Health Research And
Training Faculty Training, U.S.P.H.S. Vol. 4, No. 8.
To Top |