WET AIR OXIDATION FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT
![]() |
|
Overview: | Wet air oxidation (WAO) destroys
toxics in industrial wastewater by breaking down complex molecular
structures into simpler components such as water and carbon dioxide. The
process is based on the discovery that organics will oxidize in water, at
relatively low temperatures, as long as oxygen is present and the proper
operating pressure is maintained. Hazardous waste is oxidized in the
liquid phase at high temperatures (150-325°C) and pressures (300-3000
psi). Research indicates that most organic constituents will be oxidized
under these conditions. At these elevated temperatures and pressures, the
solubility of oxygen in water is dramatically increased, thus providing a
strong driving force for the oxidation. The WAO process generally involves
a number of oxidation and hydrolysis reactions in series that degrade the
initial compound into a series of compounds of simpler structure. Complete
WAO results in converting of hazardous organic compounds into carbon
dioxide, water vapor and ammonia (for nitrogen containing wastes), sulfate
(for sulfur containing wastes) and halogen acids (for halogenated wastes).
Partial degradation products may remain in treated wastewaters from WAO
and may be given subsequent treatment before being discharged.
Wet air oxidation is applicable to industrial wastewaters containing organics and oxidizable inorganics such as cyanide. The process is typically used to oxidize sewage sludge, regenerate spent activated carbon, and treat process wastewaters. Wastewaters treated using this technology include pesticide wastes, petrochemical process wastes, cyanide containing metal finishing wastes, spent caustic wastewaters containing phenolic compounds and some organic chemical production wastewaters. WAO can be used to treat wastewaters that have higher organic concentrations than are normally handled by biological treatment, carbon adsorption and chemical oxidation, but may be too dilute to be effectively treated by thermal processes such as incineration. WAO is most applicable for waste streams containing dissolved or suspended organics in the 500 to 15,000 mg/l range. Below 500 mg/l, the rates of WAO of most organic constituents are too slow for efficient application of this technology. WAO can be applied to wastes that have significant concentrations of metals (approximately 2 %) whereas biological treatment, carbon adsorption, and chemical oxidation may have difficulty treating such wastes. WAO proceeds as a series of reaction steps and the intermediate processes are not always as readily oxidized as are the original constituents. Therefore the process does not always achieve complete oxidation of the organic constituents. As a result it is important to evaluate the process to assess the potential products of incomplete oxidation prior to implementing the technology. WAO technology is well-developed and demonstrated for treating several hazardous wastes such as spent non-halogenated solvents and still bottoms, sludges from electroplating operations, and spent cyanide bath solutions. Successful bench scale WAO studies have been conducted on energetics [hydrazine based rocket fuel wastewater and OTTO fuel (used in torpedo propellant) wastewater], chemical agent surrogates and TNT red water. In addition, the EPA recommends WAO as the "Best Demonstrated Available Technology" for a variety of hazardous wastes. Typical results of wet air oxidation of organic compounds in industrial wastewaters are presented in the following table: Wet Air Oxidation of Organic
Compounds In Industrial Wastewater*
The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL) has completed WAO batch studies on TNT red water which is the wastewater from the manufacturing of trinitrotoluene. Major pollutants in red water include the products formed during the sellite purification of crude TNT and other by-products formed during various stages of the production process. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies TNT red water as RCRA hazardous waste K047 due to its reactivity. The lack of a cost-effective, environmentally acceptable treatment for red water impairs the Army's mission readiness for TNT production. Results indicate that WAO can be used for successfully treating red water. Information on waste destruction rates and other performance evaluation parameters has been obtained. Toxicity of the WAO-treated red water to activated sludge and other bacteria have also been evaluated. A USACERL technical report on the feasibility, kinetics, and toxicity studies is available. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Benefit: | The use of a wet air oxidation system can help facilities meet pretreatment standards for discharges of industrial wastewater to a POTW (40 CFR 403) or meet effluent limits of a NPDES permit (40 CFR 122). A WAO system may also decrease the amount of hazardous waste generated which helps facilities meet the requirements of waste reduction under RCRA, 40 CFR 262, Appendix. It may also help facilities lessen the amount of regulations they must comply with for the management of hazardous waste (i.e., recordkeeping, reporting, inspections, transportation, accumulation) under RCRA, 40 CFR 262. The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Materials Compatibility: | Wastewater with low pH may cause corrosion damage to the metals used in the WAO equipment. Wastewater pH adjustment could provide better materials compatibility results. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Safety and Health: | Care should be taken when
handling wastewater. Wastewater can be toxic and/or corrosive. Proper
personal protection equipment is, therefore, highly recommended.
Consult your local Industrial Health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing any of these technologies. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disadvantages: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Analysis: | Capital costs for wet air
oxidation systems depend on the capacity of the system, oxygen demand
reduction of the wastewater, severity of the oxidation conditions required
to meet the treatment objectives, and the materials of construction of the
wet oxidation system. The following analysis provides costs associated
with a WAO system which would treat TNT red water. The operation and
maintenance costs for the WAO system are based on estimates from the U.S.
Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories and is based on
redwater at 3.2 MG/year.
Assumptions:
Cost Comparison for WAO System vs. Disposal of Wastewater
Economic Analysis Summary Annual Savings for WAO: $2,774,500 Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values. To return from the Active Spreadsheet, click the reverse arrow in the Tool Bar. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Approving Authority: | Approval is controlled locally
and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been
granted. Major claimant approval is not required.
|
NSN/MSDS: |
|
Points of Contact: | Army: Dr. Stephen Maloney USACERL ATTN: CECER-CN-D P.O. Box 9005 Champaign, IL 61821-9005 Phone: (217) 373-3482 or (800) USA-CERL FAX: (217) 373-3430 Email: s-maloney@cecer.army.mil |
Vendors: | This is not meant to be a complete
list, as there are other manufacturers of this type of equipment.
US Filter, Zimpro Division, Inc. |
Sources: | Dr. Stephen Maloney, Ph.D.,
USACERL, November 1999. Mr. William Copa, Ph.D., U.S. Filter/Zimpro, Rothschild Wisconsin, July 1997. "Wet Air Oxidation of Hazardous Waste, U.S. Filter/Zimpro. "Wet Air Oxidation, A "rediscovered technology"," Reactor, May 1989. "Wet Air Oxidation (WAO) of TNT Red Water," USACERL Fact Sheet, February 1996. S.W. Maloney, V.M. Boddu, K.K. Phull and O.J.Hao, "TNT Red Water Treatment by Wet Air Oxidation," USACERL Technical Report EP-95/01, November 1994. |
[Back]