PEROXIDE ADVANCED OXIDATION WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Revision Date: 2/00
Process Code: Navy/Marines: SR-15-99; Air Force: FA09; Army: N/A
Usage: Navy: Low; Marines: Low;
Army: Low; Air Force: Low
Compliance Impact: Medium
Alternative for: Air Stripping with Off-Gas Treatment, Granular Activated Carbon
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: Trichloroethylene (CAS: 25323-89-1), Tetrachloroethylene (CAS: 127-18-4), Chlorinated Solvents, Pesticides, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (CAS: 1336-36-3), Phenolic Compounds, Fuel Hydrocarbons

Overview: The ultraviolet (UV) oxidation process is designed to destroy dissolved organic contaminants through an advanced chemical oxidation process using ultraviolet radiation and hydrogen peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide is added to the contaminated water, and the mixture is fed into the treatment system. The treatment system contains one or more oxidation chambers. Each chamber contains one high-intensity UV lamp, mounted in a quartz tube. The contaminated water flows in the space between the chamber wall and the quartz tube in which each UV lamp is mounted.

This technology has been successfully applied at more than 200 sites throughout the United States, Canada, and Europe. The units at these sites have treated groundwater, industrial wastewater, landfill leachates, potable water, and industrial reuse streams.

The technology was demonstrated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Superfund site. The results of the demonstration successfully reduced trichloroethene and tetrachloroethene to below analytical detection limits. Currently, the concentration of contaminants is much lower than when the system was originally put in place. For this reason, the technology will be discontinued due to its high cost. However, the technology is appropriate at other facilities.

UV light catalyzes chemical oxidation of organic contaminants in water by its combined effect upon the organic substances and reaction with hydrogen peroxide. First, many organic contaminants that absorb UV light may undergo a change in their chemical structure or may become more reactive with chemical oxidants. Second and more importantly, UV light catalyzes the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide to produce hydroxyl radicals, which are powerful chemical oxidants. Hydroxyl radicals react with organic contaminants destroying them and producing harmless carbon dioxide, halides, and water byproducts. The process produces no hazardous by-products or air emissions.

The hydrogen peroxide oxidation equipment includes circular wipers attached to the quartz tubes. These wipers periodically remove solids that may accumulate on the tubes; a feature designed to maintain treatment efficiency.

The chemical oxidation process in the hydrogen peroxide oxidation system is dependent upon a number of reaction conditions that can affect both performance and cost. The process variables that are related to the contaminated water condition are:

  • the type and concentration of organic contaminant,
  • total organic substances present,
  • light transmittance of the water (turbidity or color),
  • type and concentration of dissolved inorganic substances (e.g., carbonates and iron), and
  • pH.

The process variables that are related to the treatment process design and operation are:

  • UV and hydrogen peroxide dosage,
  • pH and temperature conditions,
  • use of supplementary catalysts, and treatment mode (batch, recycle, or continuous).


Compliance Benefit: The use of a peroxide advanced oxidation wastewater treatment system can help facilities meet pretreatment standards for discharges of wastewater to a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) (40 CFR 403) or meet effluent limits of a NPDES permit (40 CFR 122). In addition, this treatment process may help facilities meet the requirements of waste reduction under RCRA, 40 CFR 262, Appendix. Wastewater treatment units that are covered under a NPDES permit or provide for pretreatment prior to discharge into a POTW may not need to comply with requirements for a hazardous waste treatment permit. In addition, this technology will increase the amount of hydrogen at the facility, which may increase the likelihood that the facility will meet one of the reporting thresholds of SARA Title III. The technology may also increase electricity consumption at the facility.

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.


Materials Compatibility:
No materials compatibility issues were identified.


Safety and Health: Proper operation, design, and maintenance of the system will ensure its safe use. Hydrogen peroxide can be poisonous to the skin, eyes, and mucous membranes. Polychlorinated biphenyls are experimental carcinogens and teratogens; therefore, proper personal protective equipment is highly recommended.

Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits:
  • Treats wastewater contaminated with a variety of pollutants, including: chlorinated solvents, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, phenolics, fuel hydrocarbons, cyanides, and other organic compounds ranging from a few thousand milligrams per liter to less than 1 microgram per liter.
  • In some cases, the process can be combined with air stripping, activated carbon, or biological treatment for optimal treatment results.


Disadvantages:
  • High capital cost.
  • High operational cost (energy intensive).


Economic Analysis: The capital cost for the hydrogen peroxide oxidation system is between $100,000 and $200,000 for a 200,000 gallon per day treatment facility. Equipment capacities can range up to several thousand gallons per minute. Operating costs range from $0.50 to $10 per 1,000 gallons.

The cost comparison presented below is based on a report from Malcolm Pirnie, "Technical Memorandum - Estimates of annual costs to remove MTBE from water for potable used," provided by Calgon Carbon Advanced Oxidation Technologies. The cost comparison is based on the following assumptions:

Assumptions:

  • Flowrate = 600 gpm
  • Influent MTBE concentration = 700 ppb
  • Effluent concentration = 35 ppb
  • Removal efficiency = 95%
  • Operation and Maintenance Costs include 2 hrs/day labor at $45/hour
  • Power rate = $0.08/kWh
  • The traditional activated carbon treatment system is already in place.

Cost Comparison for UV treatment vs. a Traditional GAC System

 

UV/Peroxide

Granular Activated Carbon

Capital Costs: $339,000 $0
Treatment Unit Costs: $100,000 $0
Operational Costs:    
Operation and Maintenance Costs: $150,000 $613,000
Total Costs (not including capital and installation costs): $150,000 $613,000
Total Income: $0 $0
Annual Benefit: -$150,000 -$613,000

Economic Analysis Summary

    Annual Savings for UV: $463,000
    Capital Cost for Diversion Equipment/Process: $439,000
    Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: 1 year

Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values. To return from the Active Spreadsheet, click the reverse arrow in the Tool Bar.


Approving Authority: Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.


NSN/MSDS:
Product NSN Unit Size Cost MSDS*
None Identified     $  


*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs.
The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.


Points of Contact: Navy:
Mr. Tom Wick
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
1400 Farragut Avenue
Code 105.71
Bremerton, WA 98314
Phone: (360) 476-2185 ext 252
FAX:  (360) 476-6764
DSN: 439-2185


Vendors: This is not meant to be a complete list, as there are other manufacturers of this type of equipment.Calgon Carbon Oxidation Technologies
P.O. Box 717
500 Calgon Carbon Drive
Pittsburgh,  PA   15230-0717
Phone: (412) 787-6681
or (800) 422-7266
FAX: (412) 787-6682
Contact: Mr. Bertrand Dussert
Email:  info@calgoncarbon.com
URL:  http://www.calgoncarbon.com/


Sources: Mr. Tom Wick, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, February 1999.
"Technical Memorandum - Estimates of annual costs to remove MTBE from water for potable used," provided by Calgon Carbon Advanced Oxidation Technologies, Malcolm Pirnie.



[Back]