OIL/WATER SEPARATOR FOR PIERSIDE APPLICATIONS

Revision Date: 10/01
Process Code: Navy/Marines: SR-16-99; Air Force: FA09; Army: CLD
Usage: Navy: Medium; Marines: Medium;
Army: Low; Air Force: Low
Compliance Impact: Low
Alternative for: Hazardous Waste Disposal of Oil Contaminated Water
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: N/A

Overview: Oil/water separators are self-contained, automatic treatment systems used for treatment of oily wastewaters. The units can incorporate a coalescing pack to promote oil globule agglomeration that is used to enhance the conventional gravity separation process. The units are durable and simple to operate, requiring a minimum level of operator sophistication. The unit requires no filter or filter media, eliminating the costs of purchasing filters and their operation. Eliminating the need to clean or replace clogged filters minimizes downtime. These units are not designed to remove emulsified oils, dissolved inorganic chemicals such as heavy metals, or dissolved organic chemicals such as solvents and some fuels.

According to the Deputy Force Environmental Advisor, N451 at U.S. Naval Forces Japan, the oil/water separator should be protected from precipitation with a cover as part of the equipment, or provided with a shelter when installed at the facility (Navy activity action). The oil/water separator should also be provided with an expanded metal catwalk with railings for operator safety during operation and maintenance of the unit. This protects the operator from slipping or falling.

Oil/water mixtures are separated in the unit by conventional gravity separation and by enhanced coalescence in the coalescing pack. These two steps may take place in separate compartments or in a single chamber. The selection of the appropriate type of system depends on the amount of wastewater to be treated, its physical and chemical characteristics, and the treatment objectives. Some units incorporate a hopper-type bottom for accumulation and ultimate discharge of settled material.

Free oil is removed from the water by gravity separation; a process that takes advantage of the density difference between the oil and water. In general, the greater the difference in densities, the more effective will be the oil removal. The effectiveness of the process also depends on the rate that oil droplets rise through the water column, which in turn depends on the size of the oil droplets. Small oil droplets may not rise fast enough to be captured for removal unless the unit is very large (unsuitable for pierside operation) or a coalescing pack is used.

The coalescing pack may consist of a series of parallel plates or a volume of packing. The purpose of this material is to provide surface area to contact and intercept small oil droplets. Oil droplets become removed by adhering to the packing. On the packing, the small oil droplets will agglomerate, forming larger oil droplets. As these oil droplets grow in size, their buoyancy and rise rate increases and they will rise to the surface of the unit where they will be removed.

The treated effluent from these units should not contain free oil. Free oil is retained in the units by a baffle located upstream of a fixed level control device, usually a weir. Free oil is removed from the unit by skimming the surface with a variety of devices, which are specifically designed for this purpose. Selection of a skimming device depends on the amount and necessary quality (e.g., for recycling) of the oil to be removed. Both manual and automatic skimming devices are available. Sludge blowdown from the bottom hoppers can also be automated. Recovered oil and sludge is generally transferred to holding tanks for storage prior to disposal. Additional processing of these waste materials prior to disposal may be warranted for larger systems.

Oil/water separators can be located pierside to treat oily wastewater off-loaded from ships. Depending on the type of wastewater treated in the unit and the local water quality standards, the unit may or may not provide sufficient treatment for discharge to a sanitary sewer without further pretreatment.


Compliance Benefit: The use of an oil/water separator for pierside applications can help facilities meet pretreatment standards for discharges of wastewater into a POTW (40 CFR 403). In addition, this treatment process may help facilities meet the requirements of waste reduction under RCRA, 40 CFR 262, Appendix.

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.


Materials Compatibility:
Oil/water separators can be constructed from a variety of structural materials and can be protected with a wide variety of coating systems. Wastewater characteristics and the operating environment must be considered when specifying equipment. Some coalescing pack models may not be available in compatible materials but other models are available with a complete range of materials and protective systems.


Safety and Health: The principal safety concerns associated with the units concern the potential for industrial accidents associated with operation and maintenance of mechanical (pumps) and electrical equipment. Protection against slip accidents, that are associated with handling oily materials, should also be considered. Some oily wastewaters may be considered hazardous by characteristic and this would require that the pierside oil/water separator include a system for spill containment. Personnel protection training and equipment must be consistent with the activities safety programs and procedures for hazardous waste treatment, should be consistent with 29CFR 1910. Because of the potential for oily wastewater to be contaminated with fuels, tanks should be well ventilated to prevent buildup of vapors that could become explosive.


Benefits:
  • Minimizes the need for disposal of some oily wastewaters as hazardous wastes.
  • Effluent product may be discharged directly into industrial wastewater sewers or sanitary sewers.
  • No filters or filter media to purchase, replace, or dispose.
  • Can handle most mixtures of free oil and water in a continuous operation.
  • Operation and maintenance is not complex; operations can be automated.
  • Can be installed by in-house military personnel.
  • May meet environmental regulations regarding discharge into sewers.


Disadvantages:
  • Cannot effectively treat emulsified oils.
  • Can not remove dissolved materials such as fuels (gasoline), solvents, or heavy metals to most discharge limits.
  • May require storage tanks for collected oils and sludges.
  • Space requirements to place the separating unit on the pier.
  • Requires electrical service and plumbing connections.
  • Treatment effectiveness depends strongly on wastewater characteristics. Performance may not be consistent.


Economic Analysis: A comparison of the costs for disposal of oily wastewater by (1) offsite disposal as a hazardous waste or (2) treatment in a pierside oil/water separator followed by disposal in an industrial wastewater sewer was conducted. Using the design and cost assumptions outlined below, the cost comparison was developed to determine the amount of oily wastewater that must be handled by an activity in one year to justify the implementation of this treatment equipment and allocation of manpower and resources to its proper operation and maintenance.

From this analysis it was determined that an activity must handle at least 104,000 gallons per year of oily wastewater to justify installation of a pierside oil/water separator if a one year payback period is required. This analysis assumed that the wastewater would receive additional treatment at the activity and if the wastewater characteristics were such that this was not necessary, the payback period would be shorter or a smaller volume could be treated economically. However, this analysis is most sensitive to the assumptions pertaining the hazardous waste disposal costs, and care should be taken in applying these results to a specific activity that may have substantially different hazardous waste disposal costs.

Assumptions:

  • Oily wastewater will be unloaded pierside into a storage tank from which it can be fed into the oil/water separator.
  • Treated water from the oil/water separator will be discharged to the activity’s industrial wastewater sewer and will be treated in the activity’s industrial wastewater treatment plant. The cost of this supplemental treatment will be $0.10/gallon.
  • Oily wastewater can be disposed offsite without treatment for $0.75/gallon.
  • Oil/water separator unit: $30,000 for 10 gpm unit (includes installation and one time manufacturer training).
  • Electrical power required for operating the oil/water separator is 7.5 kW for operation of necessary pumps and controls.
  • Electrical power required for transferring wastewater from ships to pier are equal for both alternatives and therefore not included.
  • Electricity rate: $0.08/kw-hr.
  • Labor associated with operating unit: 2 personnel while unit is in operation plus an additional 20 percent for mobilization, demobilization, and hazardous waste handling.
  • Sludge production in the oil/water separator is 5 percent of the process flow.
  • Sludge will be disposed in drums at $200/55-gallon drum as hazardous waste.
  • Oil production in the oil/water separator is 10 percent of the process flow.
  • Oil will be recycled offsite at a cost of $0.75/gallon.
  • Burdened Labor rate: $60/hr.

Annual Operating Cost Comparison for Pierside Oil/Water Separator vs. Hazardous Waste Disposal
166,000 gallons per year Production Basis

 

Pierside Oil/Water Separator

Hazardous Waste Disposal

Operational Costs:    
Labor: $39,800 $0
Energy: $166 $0
Waste Disposal: $56,440 $124,500
Total Operational Costs: $96,400 $124,500
Total Recovered Income: $0 $0
Net Annual Cost/Benefit: -$96,400 -$124,500

Economic Analysis Summary

    Annual Savings for Pierside Oil/Water Separator: $28,100
    Capital Cost for Diversion Equipment/Process: $30,000
    Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: < 2 years

Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values.


Approving Authority: Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.


NSN/MSDS:
Product NSN Unit Size Cost MSDS*
Oil/Water Separator 6695-01-073-7109 ea. $315.47  
Oil/Water SeparatorAssembly 2090-01-076-5852 kt (5gpm) $665.03  
Oil/Water SeparatorAssembly 2090-01-076-5849 kt (5gpm) $3,671.46  


*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs.
The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.


Points of Contact: Navy:
Ms. Linda Cole
Environmental Engineer
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division
1510 Gilbert Street
Norfolk, VA 23511-2699
Phone: (757) 322-4734
DSN:  262-4734
FAX:  (757) 322-4805
Email: ColeLL@efdlant.navfac.navy.mil


Vendors: Parkson Hycor Corporation
29850 Skokie Highway
Lake Bluff, IL  60044
Phone: (630) 543-9444 
FAX: (630) 543-1169
URL:  http://www.parkson.com/

 

Hydro-Flo Technologies, Inc.
3985 Commerce Drive
St. Charles, IL  60175
Phone: (630) 762-0380
FAX: (630) 762-0390
URL:  http://www.hydroflotech.com/

 

National Fluid Separators, Inc.
827 Hanley Industrial Court
St. Louis,  MO   63144
Phone: (314) 968-2838 
FAX: (314) 968-4773
Email: nfs@mjind.com

 

QED Environmental Systems
P.O. Box 3726
Ann Arbor,  MI   48106-3726
Phone: (800) 624-2026
or (734) 995-2547 
FAX: (734) 995-1170
URL:  http://www.qedenv.com/

 

Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co. (Ultracept)
Environmental Products Group
2781 Gunter Park Drive, East
Montgomery,  AL   36109-1405
Phone: (800) 767-0466 
or (334) 277-8520
FAX: (334) 272-7396
URL:  http://www.jayrsmith.com/

 

US Filter, Zimpro Division
301 W. Military Road
Rothschild,  WI   54474
Phone: (715) 359-7211 
or (800) 826-1476
FAX: (715) 355-3335
URL:  http://www.zimpro.com/

 

Sources: Mr. Rudy Pontemayor, Deputy Force Environmental Advisor, N451, April 1999.
Mr. Bill Matthews, National Fluid Separators, May 1996.



[Back]