THE CLEAN-IN-PLACE (CIP) METHOD TO MINIMIZE HAZARDOUS WASTE

Revision Date: 2/00
Process Code: Navy/Marines: ID-03-99; Air Force: CL04; Army: N/A
Usage: Navy: Medium; Marines: Medium; Army: Medium; Air Force: Medium
Compliance Impact: Medium
Alternative for: Hydroblasting, manual chemical and solvent cleaning
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: Carbon Tetrachloride (CAS: 56-23-5), Chloroform (CAS: 67-66-3), Dichloromethane (CAS: 75-09-2), Methyl Ethyl Ketone (CAS: 78-93-3), Tetrachloroethylene (CAS: 127-18-4), Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (CAS: 108-10-1), 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (CAS: 71-55-6), Toluene (CAS: 108-88-3), Trichloroethylene (CAS: 25323-89-1), Xylene (CAS: 1330-20-7)


Overview:

Clean-In-Place (CIP) is a method designed to "automatically" clean pipes and process equipment without the time and labor requirement of manually dismantling equipment components. Long-term, CIP is less expensive and more consistent than conventional manual cleaning methods. CIP is not a substitute for the use of solvents, but rather, a more efficient way to use them.

CIP is more of a design method than a cleaning process. The CIP method works "automatically" by eliminating the places where residue can accumulate. This is achieved by placing pipes at an angle to the horizontal (minimum 3%) to improve drainage, and using instruments and valves that connect flush to pipes, thereby eliminating "dead legs" (places where residues can be trapped). CIP is perhaps best applied to batch process operations because the amount of residual product from a single batch can contaminate subsequent batches. Given the frequency of these operations, the CIP method is ideally suited to fast turnarounds and to achieving a high degree of piping and equipment cleanliness.

The CIP method can be improved with specially designed process equipment, piping, and fittings that have ducts and spray balls for cleaning the equipment internally. As of July 1994, only diaphragm valves have been used with CIP. Ball and slide valves can be modified with injection ports for use with CIP, but this makes them very complex. Plug and stem valves have been used successfully for these installations.

To enhance the CIP method, use a CIP cleaning system, which consists of a centralized control unit with satellite spray washing and rinsing units to clean the process equipment, pumps, valves and pipes. Also, use gear pumps with a low "dead" volume (where "dead" volume refers to the amount of void space that does not drain freely and as a consequence can be difficult to clean because material is stagnant and then dries or polymerizes). Mechanical drives have internal parts that have void spaces where residue can be deposited. Generally, these must be removed for cleaning. However, for difficult applications with rotating equipment such as agitators, magnetic drives can be used. As an alternative, spray devices can be installed in mechanical drives as well.

The CIP cleaning system is procured as a package consisting of a recirculation system: storage tank, pump, heat exchanger, and rotary strainer; a chemical feeder which makes the cleaning solutions; a cleaning system with spray balls and piping to supply and return the various solutions; solution-return tanks; and control instrumentation. After the chemical process is complete, activate the CIP cleaning system to clean and rinse the equipment, the cleaning can even be integrated into the process program.

According to the Deputy Force Environmental Advisor, N451 for U.S. Naval Forces Japan, a similar method employed by the petroleum industry is a "pig" to clean product lines. Basically, it consists of a rotating head with brushes or similar implement, a launcher and a retriever. To clean the pipe, the cleaner head is launched or propelled with compressed air, cleaning the pipe as it goes. The cleaning head is recovered (retrieved) at the end of the pipe run. This is particularly suited for longer pipe runs.


Compliance Benefit:

Use of the clean-in-place method will decrease the amount of hazardous waste generated from cleaning process equipment and pipes. The decrease in hazardous waste will help facilities meet the requirements of waste reduction under RCRA, 40 CFR 262, Appendix, and may also help facilities reduce their generator status and lessen the number of regulatory requirements (i.e., record-keeping, reporting, inspections, transportation, accumulation time, emergency prevention and preparedness, emergency response) with which they must comply with under RCRA, 40 CFR 262. This cleaning method may also decrease the amount of solvents used on site below any reporting thresholds of SARA Title III for those chemicals (40 CFR 355, 370, and 372; and EO 12856).

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.


Materials Compatibility:
As the CIP cleaning system does not alter the actual chemicals used for cleaning, material compatibility should not be an issue.


Safety and Health:

Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing any of these technologies.


Benefits:
  • Lower labor costs
  • Decrease in raw material usage
  • Lower energy costs


Disadvantages:
  • Requires redesign or modification of the current system


Economic Analysis:

Costs associated with the Clean In Place Method are highly specific to the application. Prices will vary on a case by case basis. Factors affecting capital investment and operating costs are size of system, type of system and components, cleanliness level, production rate, and operating requirements.


Approving Authority:

Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.



NSN/MSDS:
Product NSN Unit Size Cost MSDS*
None Identified $  

*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs.
The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.

Points of Contact: Navy:
Mr. Rudy M. Pontemayor
P.E. (Chemical Engr.)
Deputy Force Environmental Advisor, N451
Commander, U.S. Naval Forces, Japan
Phone: 81-311-743-9197/9078 ext 9197/9078 or (0468) 21-1910
DSN: 243-9197 or 243-9078
DSN FAX: 243-6388
Email: n451@cnfj.navy.mil

Vendors: Hartel Corp.
201 North Main Street
Ft. Atkinson,  WI   53538
Phone: (920) 563-8461 
URL: http://www.asapsys.com/equipment.asp

  Chemdet, Inc.
50 Sintsink Drive, East
Port Washington,  NY   11050
Phone: (800) 645-5150 
FAX: (516) 883-2044
URL: http://www.chemdet.com

Sources:

Mr. Rudy Pontemayor, Deputy Force Environmental Advisor, N451, February 2000.
Mr.Gene Bohn, Hartel Corporation, January 1998.



[Back]