SUBSTITUTING SYNTHETIC OIL FOR CONVENTIONAL OIL
![]() |
|
Overview: | When used in
place of conventional motor oil, synthetic oil lasts longer thus requiring
fewer changeouts. As a result, both waste oil generation and consumption
of oil are reduced.
Synthetic motor oils are blends of synthesized hydrocarbon fluids (SHF's) and esters derived from petrochemicals, and are manufactured by combining the various organic chemicals. Other synthetic hydrocarbon compounds are also suitable for lubricating oils, and manufacturers may blend two or more of these compounds together to achieve the desired properties. While they appear chemically similar to mineral oils refined from crude, they are pure chemicals that do not contain the impurities or waxes inherent in conventional mineral oils. Conventional mineral oils thicken or thin dramatically with changes in temperature. As a result, manufacturers add thickeners to conventional multigrade oils to slow thinning as engine temperatures rise. Synthetic oils have high resistance to changes in viscosity due to temperature, and thus have less of a requirement for thickeners. As such they provide a heavier, more stable protective oil film for engine bearings and piston rings than that provided by similar SAE-grade mineral oils. Synthetic oil is superior to petroleum oil because it permits better cold weather performance and longer endurance. Synthesized compounds continue to flow at low temperatures. Synthetic 10W-30 oils flow at temperatures as low as -54°C (-65°F) and pump at lower temperatures than similar SAE viscosity conventional oils. Synthetic 15W-50 oils flow at -48°C (-55°F) and pump at temperatures as low as many conventional SAE 5W-30 oils. According to the San Antonio Air Logistics Center (SA-ALC), the primary benefit of synthetic oil is this superior performance at low temperatures. Synthetics are also more thermally stable. Manufacturers claim that synthetic oils help improve fuel economy, reduce friction and wear, decrease oil consumption, better engine performance at lower temperatures and extend oil change intervals. However, since synthetic oil has improved fluidity, oil loss will occur more quickly through leaks because the thinner fluid will flow through a bad seal or worn ring. SA-ALC reports that the use of synthetic oils has not enabled them to reduce oil change intervals. Although some synthetic compounds are not compatible with conventional oils adding a quart of synthetic oil to conventional oil produces a compatible mixture. However, the lower friction resulting from the use of synthetic lubricants makes them unsuitable for break-in. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Benefit: | The
substitution of synthetic oil for conventional oil may allow longer
intervals between change outs, thereby reducing oil consumption and waste
disposal. The decrease in the amount of used oil generated will decrease
the labor requirement for managing used oil under 40 CFR 279 or 40 CFR
262. Moreover, since less oil should be stored on site, a facility will
decrease the likelihood of reaching reporting thresholds under 40 CFR 355
and EO 12856. A decrease in oil stored on site may also put a facility
below threshold amounts for the requirement to develop and implement a
Spill, Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan under 40 CFR 112.
The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Materials Compatibility: |
No materials compatibility issues were identified. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Safety and Health: | The use
of synthetic oil poses minimal safety and health concern. Care must be
taken when handling hot oil. Proper personal protective equipment is
recommended. Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local
health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to
implementing this technology. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disadvantages: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Analysis: | An economic analysis assuming
synthetic oil lasts three times as long as conventional oil is presented
below for a 12-quart capacity vehicle. Oil and filter disposal information
was based on estimates from the San Antonio Air Logistics Center.
Lubricant and filter price information was provided by the
vendors.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Approving Authority: | Approval is controlled locally
and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been
granted. Major claimant approval is not required.
|
NSN/MSDS: |
|
Points of Contact: | Air Force: Mr. Michael Schleider Chief, Systems Engineering Division Support Equipment and Vehicle Management Directorate WR-ALC/LEE 295 Byron Street Robins AFB, GA 31098-1611 Phone: (478) 926-7603 x 166 DSN: 468-7603 FAX: (478) 926-7731 DSN FAX: 468-7731 Email: michael.schleider@robins.af.mil |
Vendors: | This is not meant to be a complete
list, as there may be other suppliers of this type of equipment.
Chevron Corp. Castrol Industrial North America, Inc. Mobil Corporation AMSOIL Inc. |
Sources: | Mr. Michael Schleider, Robins Air Force
Base, January 1999. Mr. David Elliot, San Antonio Air Logistics Center, January 1999.
|
[Back]