SUBSTITUTING SYNTHETIC OIL FOR CONVENTIONAL OIL

Revision Date: 9/01
Process Code: Navy/Marines:  SR-02; Air Force:  PM08; Army: VHM
Usage: Navy: Medium; Marines: Medium; Army: Medium; Air Force: Low
Alternative for: Conventional Oils
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: N/A

Overview: When used in place of conventional motor oil, synthetic oil lasts longer thus requiring fewer changeouts. As a result, both waste oil generation and consumption of oil are reduced.

Synthetic motor oils are blends of synthesized hydrocarbon fluids (SHF's) and esters derived from petrochemicals, and are manufactured by combining the various organic chemicals. Other synthetic hydrocarbon compounds are also suitable for lubricating oils, and manufacturers may blend two or more of these compounds together to achieve the desired properties. While they appear chemically similar to mineral oils refined from crude, they are pure chemicals that do not contain the impurities or waxes inherent in conventional mineral oils. Conventional mineral oils thicken or thin dramatically with changes in temperature. As a result, manufacturers add thickeners to conventional multigrade oils to slow thinning as engine temperatures rise. Synthetic oils have high resistance to changes in viscosity due to temperature, and thus have less of a requirement for thickeners. As such they provide a heavier, more stable protective oil film for engine bearings and piston rings than that provided by similar SAE-grade mineral oils.

Synthetic oil is superior to petroleum oil because it permits better cold weather performance and longer endurance. Synthesized compounds continue to flow at low temperatures. Synthetic 10W-30 oils flow at temperatures as low as -54°C (-65°F) and pump at lower temperatures than similar SAE viscosity conventional oils. Synthetic 15W-50 oils flow at -48°C (-55°F) and pump at temperatures as low as many conventional SAE 5W-30 oils. According to the San Antonio Air Logistics Center (SA-ALC), the primary benefit of synthetic oil is this superior performance at low temperatures.

Synthetics are also more thermally stable. Manufacturers claim that synthetic oils help improve fuel economy, reduce friction and wear, decrease oil consumption, better engine performance at lower temperatures and extend oil change intervals. However, since synthetic oil has improved fluidity, oil loss will occur more quickly through leaks because the thinner fluid will flow through a bad seal or worn ring. SA-ALC reports that the use of synthetic oils has not enabled them to reduce oil change intervals.

Although some synthetic compounds are not compatible with conventional oils adding a quart of synthetic oil to conventional oil produces a compatible mixture. However, the lower friction resulting from the use of synthetic lubricants makes them unsuitable for break-in.


Compliance Benefit: The substitution of synthetic oil for conventional oil may allow longer intervals between change outs, thereby reducing oil consumption and waste disposal. The decrease in the amount of used oil generated will decrease the labor requirement for managing used oil under 40 CFR 279 or 40 CFR 262. Moreover, since less oil should be stored on site, a facility will decrease the likelihood of reaching reporting thresholds under 40 CFR 355 and EO 12856. A decrease in oil stored on site may also put a facility below threshold amounts for the requirement to develop and implement a Spill, Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan under 40 CFR 112.

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.


Materials
Compatibility:

No materials compatibility issues were identified.


 
Safety and Health: The use of synthetic oil poses minimal safety and health concern. Care must be taken when handling hot oil. Proper personal protective equipment is recommended. Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits:
  • Synthetic oil lasts two to five times longer than conventional oil thus waste oil generation can be reduced two to five times if synthetic oil is used.
  • Synthetic oils have high resistance to changes in viscosity due to temperature. As a result they provide a heavier, more stable protective oil film for engine bearings and piston rings than is provided by similar SAE-grade mineral oils.
  • Synthetic oil permits better cold weather performance and longer endurance.
  • Manufacturers claim that synthetic oil yields better fuel economy, reductions in friction and wear, decreased oil consumption, improved performance, and extended drain intervals.


Disadvantages:
  • Synthetic oil costs more than conventional oil. The higher cost is typically offset by reduced waste generation, however,
  • Since synthetic oil has improved fluidity, oil loss will occur more quickly through leaks because the thinner fluid will flow through a bad seal or worn ring.
  • Some synthetic compounds are not compatible with conventional oils.
  • The lower friction resulting from the use of a synthetic lubricant makes them unsuitable for break-in.


Economic Analysis: An economic analysis assuming synthetic oil lasts three times as long as conventional oil is presented below for a 12-quart capacity vehicle. Oil and filter disposal information was based on estimates from the San Antonio Air Logistics Center. Lubricant and filter price information was provided by the vendors.

Assumptions:

  • 30 vehicles in fleet
  • Labor Cost: $20/hr
  • Labor: 0.5 hour per oil change
  • Oil Disposal: oils are recycled at no cost to the facility
  • Oil Cost: Synthetic - $14.51/gallon, Conventional - $4.42/gal
  • Conventional Oil is changed three times per year, synthetic oil is changed once per year
  • Filters cost $6.00 each
  • Filter Disposal: Estimated at $100 per drum, 100 filter per drum
  • Oil capacity of vehicle is an average of 12 quarts (or 3 gallons)

Annual Operating Cost Comparison for Synthetic Oil verses Conventional Oil Use

Synthetic Conventional
Operational Costs
Labor: $300 $900
Oil Costs: $1,305 $1,193
Filter Cost: $180 $540
Filter Disposal: $30 $90
Total Costs: $1,816 $$2,723
Total Income: $0 $0
Annual Benefit -$1,816 -$2,723



Economic Analysis Summary

Annual Savings for Synthetic Oils: $908
Capital Cost for Diversion Equipment/Process: $0
Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: N/A

NOTE:  There is no payback period because there is not capital cost.

Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values. To return from the Active Spreadsheet, click the reverse arrow in the Tool Bar.


Approving Authority: Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.


NSN/MSDS:
Product NSN Unit Size Cost MSDS*
None Identified        


*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs.
The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.


Points of Contact: Air Force:
Mr. Michael Schleider
Chief, Systems Engineering Division
Support Equipment and Vehicle Management Directorate
WR-ALC/LEE
295 Byron Street
Robins AFB, GA  31098-1611
Phone: (478) 926-7603 x 166
DSN: 468-7603
FAX: (478) 926-7731
DSN FAX: 468-7731
Email: michael.schleider@robins.af.mil


Vendors: This is not meant to be a complete list, as there may be other suppliers of this type of equipment.

Chevron Corp.
575 Market St.
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: (415) 894-7700
FAX: (415) 894-0583
URL:  http://www.chevron.com/

Castrol Industrial North America, Inc.
1001 W. 31st.
Downers Grove, IL 60515
Phone: (800) 621-2661
0r (630) 241-4000
FAX: (630) 241-1957
URL:  http://www.castrolindustrialna.com/

Mobil Corporation
3225 Gallows Road
Fairfax, VA 22037
Phone: (800) 662-4525
FAX: (703) 849-6065
URL:  http://www.mobil.com/

AMSOIL Inc.
AMSOIL Building
Superior, WI  54880
Phone:  (715) 392-7101
FAX:  (715) 392-5225
URL:  http://www.amsoil.com/


Sources: Mr. Michael Schleider, Robins Air Force Base, January 1999.
Mr. David Elliot, San Antonio Air Logistics Center, January 1999.

 


[Back]