HIGH AND MEDIUM PRESSURE WATER PAINT STRIPPING PROCESSES

Revision Date: 1/00
Process Code: Navy and Marine Corps: ID-01-01; Air Force: ST01; Army: DPT
Usage: Navy: Low; Marine Corps: Low; Army: Medium; Air Force: Medium
Compliance Impact: High
Alternative for: Chemical Paint Stripping
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: Toluene (CAS: 108-88-3), Xylenes (CAS: 1330-20-7), Methyl Ethyl Ketone (CAS: 78-93-3), Acetone (67-64-1), n-Butyl Alcohol (CAS: 71-36-3), Methylene Chloride (CAS: 75-09-2) Lead (CAS: 7439-92-1), Chromium (CAS: 7440-47-3), Zinc Compounds, Phenols (CAS: 108-95-2), Chloroacetic Acids (CAS: 79-11-8), Cyanides

Overview:

High and medium pressure water blast systems are used for paint stripping surfaces with low-volume water streams at pressures ranging from 3,000 to 15,000 psi (medium pressure operations), and from 15,000 to 55,000 psi (high-pressure operations). The medium pressure systems may be augmented with blast water additives and/or surface treatments. For example, sodium bicarbonate may be added to the water stream, or environmentally compliant chemicals may be applied to painted surfaces prior to water blasting. High-pressure systems typically use pure water streams. With both medium and high-pressure water systems, specialized nozzles can be used to achieve effects ranging from a relatively gentle, layer-by-layer removal of organic paints to removal of metal flame spray coating and other tough, tightly adherent coatings. The process water, paint, and residue are collected by the effluent-recovery system for filtering the paint and residue, removing leached ions (copper, cadmium, lead, etc.), microparticulates, chlorides, sulfates, nitrates, and other contaminants. The water is passed through a coalescing tank to remove oils and film, a through charcoal filter, microfilters and, finally, a deionization system to ensure that the water is Type IV or better deionized water. The recovered deionized water is recycled back into the process.

Currently, WR-ALC at Robins AFB uses a medium pressure water system (12,000 - 15,000 psi). The system is used for coating removal on the C-5, C-130, and F-15 aircraft and also some off-aircraft components. The system is used with either a non-hazardous air pollutant chemical remover, sodium bicarbonate blast media, or by itself depending on the coating being removed.


Compliance Benefit:

Use of high and medium pressure water paint stripping as a replacement for chemical paint strippers results in the following compliance benefits:

  • Elimination or reduction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) used as strippers, which are associated with the formation of smog typically regulated by state and local air pollution control districts.
  • Elimination or reduction of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) in strippers which are regulated by federal, state, and local regulations including the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) (40 CFR 63).
  • Elimination or reduction of SARA Title III reporting (40 CFR 300, 355, 370, and 372; and EO 13148).
  • Reduced volumes of organic wastes, which must be managed as hazardous waste under 40 CFR 260 and related sections.
  • Reduced potential for release of hazardous substances in reportable quantities (40 CFR 110 and 302).
  • Reduced occupational exposures, which are regulated under 29 CFR 1910.
  • Decreased water use as required under EO 12902.

Compliance benefits include: 1) reduced recordkeeping and reporting requirements under the Clean Air Act Title V Operating Permits Program, NESHAPs Program, and SARA programs, 2) reduced administrative burden associated with hazardous waste (i.e., tracking, plans, reports, training), and 3) reduced administrative burden associated with OSHA (i.e., training and recordkeeping).

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.


Materials Compatibility:

No material compatibility problems have been documented for use of high and medium pressure water processes to de-paint metallic surfaces. However, according to Mr. Randy Ivey, Materials Engineering (WR-ALC/TIEDM) medium and high-pressure water streams can damage composite and honeycomb thin skinned materials. The use of specific chemicals to augment medium pressure water processes must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.


Safety and Health:

Proper design, operation, and maintenance of the equipment is required for its safe use. Proper personal protective equipment is also recommended.

Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits:

  • Reduces hazardous waste by 90%

  • May be adjusted to Sselectively removes individual coating-layers

  • Pre-washing and masking is not needed in most applications

  • No size limitations for parts being stripped

  • Process water reclamation units capture removed paint and recirculate water.

  • Wastewater stream compatibility with industrial wastewater plants must be determined on a case-by-case basis taking into account the characteristics of the waste stream and plant's capability.

  • Low implementation cost utilizing simple robust equipment

  • Reduces the process material costs significantly

  • Reduces labor hours for the stripping process by 50%

  • No dust or airborne contaminants generated

  • Requires no cleanup after stripping

  • Specific additives will control flash rusting and give long term portection.


Disadvantages:

  • High capital costs

  • May not remove corrosion

  • The characteristics of the coatings to be removed may impact personal protection and waste collection/disposal considerations

  • Coating debris sludge is a potential hazardous waste

  • Wastewater disposal requirements depend on the toxicity of the coating being removed

  • Workers must be protected from direct impingement of the water jet

  • Operator training is required

  • Water can penetrate and/or damage joints, seals, and bonded areas

  • Additives to the water may have an adverse effect (i.e., flash rusting) on the surfaces being cleaned

  • Stripping rate varies with the type of paint, coating condition and coating thickness

  • This technique is not appropriate for composite or honeycomb thin skinned materials

  • The medium pressure water stripping process works well as a supplement to chemical paint stripping, but is not recommended as a stand alone paint removal process for complete aircraft stripping. It has many successful applications as a part/component stripping process. Medium pressure water without abrasive additives, such as sodium bicarbonate, does not always remove paint completely. High-pressure water is not a technology that has proven effective for off-aircraft component paint stripping. Capital investment for high pressure water paint stripping is cost prohibitive.


Economic Analysis: The capital cost for high and medium pressure water processes will vary considerably, depending upon the process and its application. Capital costs for medium pressure systems range from $40,000 to $70,000 and capital costs for high-pressure systems range from $850,000 to $1,500,000. According to PRO-ACT, the cost of water is an integral part of the process and potential savings due to recycling and elimination of surface washing following chemical paint stripping.


Assumptions:
  • 3 aircraft will be de-painted per month
  • External paint area of each aircraft: 937.8 ft2
  • Strip rate for one aircraft: 2 ft2/min for Water Process, 0.22 ft2/min for Chemical Process
  • Labor rate: $30/hr
  • Electricity: $0.08/kw-hr
  • Paint and solvent sludge disposal cost: $4/gal
  • Dry paint waste disposal cost: $2/lb

Water Process

  • Total labor requirements for one aircraft: 7.8 hr/aircraft
  • Material costs: $445/aircraft
  • System electrical requirements: 907 kw-hr/aircraft (see attached note JLR)
  • System maintenance cost: $311/aircraft
  • Dry paint waste residue: 30 lb/aircraft

Chemical Process

  • Total labor requirements for one aircraft: 71 hr/aircraft
  • Chemical procurement cost: $10/gallon
  • Chemical consumption for a 937.8 ft2 aircraft: 35 gallons/aircraft or $350/aircraft
  • Paint and solvent waste: 87 gal/aircraft

Annual Operating Cost Comparison for High Pressure Water Paint Stripping and Chemical Paint Stripping

 

Water Stripping

Chemical Stripping

Operational Costs:

   
Labor:

$8,400

$76,700

Material

$16,000

$12,600

Energy

$2,600

$0

Waste Disposal

$2,200

$12,528

System Maintenance:

$11,200

$0

Total Operational Costs:

$38,200

$101,828

Total Recovered Income:

$0

$0

Net Annual Benefit/Cost:

-$38,200

-$101,828

Economic Analysis Summary
Annual Savings for Water Stripping: $63,628
Capital Cost for Diversion Equipment/Process: $1,175,000
Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: <19 years

Click Here to View an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values. To return from the Active Spreadsheet, click the reverse arrow in the Tool Bar.


Approving Authority:

Medium pressure water paint removal is an approved process in T.O.1-1-8. However, use of this process requires approval by the engineering authority of the specific Weapon System manager and Equipment Item Manager. High-pressure water paint removal systems are not recommended by the Air Force corrosion Program Office and technical guidance for the process is not provided. Use of this process must be approved by the engineering authority of the specific Weapon System Manager and Equipment Item manager.

For Air Force applications, high and medium pressure water paint stripping must not be used on any aircraft or weapon systems without the knowledge and approval of the appropriate system manager, office(s) having engineering authority on the specific airframe(s) and the Air Force Corrosion Program Office.


NSN/MSDS:

Product

NSN

Unit Size

Cost

Hi-Press. Water Gun Cleaner

4940-01-413-5600

ea.

$2,421.05

10-100 Hose

Pending

ea.

$822.60

 


Points of Contact:

Navy:
Mr. Scott Mauro
Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, ESC 423
1100 23rd Avenue
Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370
Phone: (805) 982-5318, DSN: 551-5318, Fax: (805) 982-4832
Email: maurosm@nfesc.navy.mil

Air Force:
Mr. Larry Garrett or Mr. Richard Slife
Materials Engineering (WR-ALC/TIEDM)
420 2nd Street, Suite 100
Robins AFB, GA 31098
Phone: (912) 926-4489, DSN: 468-4489, Fax: (912) 926-1743

Air Force Corrosion Prevention and Control Office
AFRL/MLS-OLR (Bldg. 165)
325 2nd Street
Robins AFB, GA 31098-1640
Phone: (912) 926-3284, DSN: 468-3284


Vendors:

The following is a list of high and medium pressure water system vendors. This is not meant to be a complete list, as there may be other manufacturers of this type of equipment.

Aqua Miser®
Carolina Equipment and Supply
Mr. Chris Fulmer
7251 Cross County Rd.
N. Charleston, SC 29418
Phone: (800) 394-4987, (803) 760-3000, Fax: (803) 760-3500
(Medium pressure water systems)

O'Connell Jetting Systems
Mr. Mike Richardson
3195 "H" Park Road
Benicia, CA 94510
Phone: (800) 320-4848, (707) 747-4848, Fax: (707) 747-6372

NLB Corporation
29830-T Beck Road
Wixom, MI 48393 2824
Phone: (800) 394-4587, (248) 624-5555, Fax: (248) 624-0908


Sources:

N/A


[Back]