PAINT STRIPPER, HOT TANK

Revision Date: 09/01
Process Code: Navy/Marines: ID-02-14; Air Force: PA09; Army: PNT
Usage: Navy: Medium; Marines: Medium; Army: Medium; Air Force: Medium
Compliance Impact: High
Alternative for: Solvent Paint Stripping
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: Chloromethane (CAS: 74-87-3), Methyl Ethyl Ketone (CAS: 78-93-3), 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (CAS: 71-55-6)

Overview: Parts can be stripped of paint using aqueous chemicals at elevated temperatures. These chemicals are biodegradable and can be discharged into the sewer system, thereby virtually eliminating hazardous waste disposal costs. However, certain hazardous constituents in the paint may contaminate the solution. Check your local discharge regulations prior to disposing the contaminated solvent.

By using these chemicals in a hot tank, the elevated temperatures increase the stripping action by stripping paint as well as removing grease, oil, rust, and dirt. The parts requiring stripping are immersed into the solution and then agitated to speed up the stripping process. In conjunction with optional equipment such as filtration systems and skimmers, the chemical solution may be recycled and used again.

Most of the aqueous strippers are alkaline in nature. These strippers are different from acid strippers in that acid strippers may attack the metal parts, causing structural weakening (hydrogen embrittlement). In addition, acid strippers normally require a neutralization process after stripping.

Hot tanks can come in a variety of sizes, from 100-gallon to 2,500-gallon capacities. Most hot tanks have an agitating operation to accelerate the stripping. With agitation, the mechanical force of the moving solution keeps washing newly formed emulsions and soaps away from surfaces while applying fresh chemical stripping agents to the newly exposed layers of paint, thereby speeding the entire action. Most hot tanks have a temperature range from 180-210oF.

Unlike the current practice of using a cold tank in conjunction with solvents, no solvent waste streams are generated with the hot tank using biodegradable cleaners. Effluent waste streams associated with the use of hot tank aqueous strippers would be the aqueous solution and sludge products composed of paint, grease, oil, and dirt. The aqueous solution may be recycled, or if it meets local sewer discharge limits, it may be discharged directly into the local sewer system. Any sludge products generated would require proper disposal. However, the use of hot tank/aqueous strippers eliminates exposure to toxic solvent vapors.

The Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force currently use hot tank/aqueous strippers. They are used to strip paint from a variety of parts, including aircraft components.


Compliance Benefit:

The use of a hot tank paint stripper which uses aqueous chemicals in place of solvents will decrease the generation of waste solvent from stripping operations. The decrease in hazardous waste helps facilities meet the requirements of waste reduction under RCRA, 40 CFR 262, Appendix. It may also help facilities reduce their generator status and lessen the number of regulatory requirements (e.g., recordkeeping, reporting, inspections, transportation, accumulation time, emergency prevention and preparedness, emergency response) with which they must comply under RCRA, 40 CFR 262. In addition, since less solvent is used, the possibility that a facility meets any of the reporting thresholds of SARA Title III for solvents (40 CFR 355, 370, and 372; and EO 12856) is decreased. Use of an hot tank paint stripper may decrease the amount of ODSs used at a facility. This will help the facility meet the requirements under 40 CFR 82, Subpart D and Executive Order 12843 requiring federal agencies to maximize the use of safe alternatives to Class I and Class II ozone depleting substances, to the maximum extent practicable. Replacing toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and methyl ethyl ketone used in cleaning prior to sealing may decrease the likelihood of the facility requiring an air permit under 40 CFR 70 and 71. Switching from a halogenated solvent (e.g., methyl chloroform, methylene chloride, perchloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, or chloroform) may also decrease the need for a facility to meet the NESHAPs for halogenated solvent cleaning (40 CFR 63). A wastewater discharge permit may be required from the local POTW.

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.


Materials Compatibility:

Aqueous strippers used in hot tank paint stripping are compatible with most metals; e.g. iron, steel, magnesium, titanium, and stainless steel. However, the aqueous solution may darken the metallic surface. Also, some aqueous strippers cannot be used on metals such as aluminum, zinc, and tin. The product container label should be consulted for metals compatibility.


Safety and Health:

Though biodegradable and environmentally friendly, the majority of the cleaners are corrosive and may cause burns to the skin or other parts of the body with which they come into contact. Proper personal protective equipment (PPE) should be worn. In addition, since the tank will be heated, caution should be exercised to prevent burns. Insulation should be provided for both energy conservation as well as protection from skin burns.

Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits:
  • Minimizes hazardous waste disposal.
  • Eliminates exposure to known carcinogenic and neurotoxic solvents.
  • Lessens paint stripping time.
  • Meets environmental regulations regarding the use of ozone depleting substances (ODSs).
  • Spent wash solutions may be discharged into sewer systems if they meet the local discharge limits.


Disadvantages:
  • Not compatible with all metals.
  • May require additional ventilation.


Economic Analysis: The following cost elements are reported for Hot Tank Paint Stripping and Cold Tank Paint Stripping using Trichloroethane.

Assumptions:

  • Area of parts to be stripped of paint: 1,000 sqft.
  • Minimal process water usage for the hot tank.
  • Water discharged into the sewer system meets the local discharge limits.
  • Stripping rate for the hot tank is equal to the cold chemical stripping rate.
  • Hot tank procurement cost: $30,000 (300-gal tank)
  • Aqueous stripper procurement for a 300-gal tank: $705
  • Hot tank electricity: 304 kw·hr. for 1,000 sqft (based on a stripping rate of 0.22 sqft/min, or 76 hrs)
  • Electricity rate: $0.08 kw·hr.
  • Labor required for the hot tank stripping: 50 hrs
  • Labor rate: $30/hr.
  • Paint/sludge disposal from the hot tank stripping: $400 (based on one 55-gal drum for 1,000 sqft of material stripped)
  • Water discharge into local sewer system: $3 (based on 300 gal at a rate of $10/1,000 gal)
  • TCA procurement cost for 300 gal: $5,000
  • Solvent tank pump electricity: 304 kw·hr. for 1,000 sqft (based on stripping rate of 0.22 sqft/min, or 76 hrs)
  • Labor required for the solvent cold tank stripping: 50 hrs.
  • Solvent disposal: $2,000 based on 8 55-gallon drums of spent solvent and soiled rags
  • Paint/sludge disposal from solvent stripping: $400 (based on one 55-gal drum for 1,000 sqft of material stripped)
  • Solvent profile analysis: $1,000/yr.

Annual Operating Cost Comparison for Hot Tank Stripping and Solvent Stripping

 

Hot Tank Stripping

Solvent Stripping

Operational Costs:    
Labor: $1,500 $1,500
Material: $705 $5,000
Electricity: $24 $24
Waste Disposal (includes discharge into sewer system, if applicable): $403 $2,400
Effluent Profile Analysis: $0 $1,000
Total Operational Costs: $2,632 $9,924
Total Recovered Income: $0 $0
Net Annual Cost/Benefit: -$2,632 -$9,924

Economic Analysis Summary

    Annual Savings for Hot Tank Stripping: $7,292
    Capital Cost for Diversion Equipment/Process: $30,000
    Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: < 4 years

Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values.


Approving Authority:

Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.


NSN/MSDS:
Product NSN Unit Size Cost MSDS*
None Identified     $  

 
*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs.
The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.
To return from the MSDS, click the reverse arrow in the Tool Bar.


Points of Contact:


Navy:
Mr. Scott Mauro
Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, ESC 423
1100 23rd Avenue
Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370
Phone: (805) 982-4889
DSN: 551-4889
FAX: (805) 982-4832
Email: maurosm@nfesc.navy.mil

Mr. Rudy M. Pontemayor
P.E. (Chemical Engr.)
Deputy Force Environmental Advisor, N451
Commander, U.S. Naval Forces, Japan
Phone: 81-311-743-9197/9078 ext 9197/9078 or (0468) 21-1910
DSN: 243-9197 or 243-9078
DSN FAX: 243-6388
Email: n451@cnfj.navy.mil


Vendors:

Ramco Equipment Corporation
3248 Montgomery St.
Hillside,  NJ   07205
Phone: (908) 687-6700 
FAX: (908) 687-0653

West Penetone
74 Hudson Ave.
Penafly,  NJ   07670
Phone: (800) 631-1652 2214
or (201) 567-3000
FAX: (201) 569-5340
Contact: Mr. Don Martel

Brulin Corporation
2920 Dr. Andrew J. Brown Avenue
Indianapolis,  IN   46205
Phone: (317) 923-3211 
FAX: (317) 925-4596


Sources:

Mr. Rudy Pontemayor, Deputy Force Environmental Advisor, N451, April 1999.
Mr. Bob Grange, Brulin Corp., May 1996.
Mr. Don Martel, West Penetone, May 1996.
Mr. Fred Randall, Ramco Equipment Corp., May 1996.
Ms. Jackie Felder, Laidlaw Environmental Services, May 1996.


[Back]