WATERBORNE PAINT
![]() |
|
Overview: | Waterborne paints have been
evaluated as alternatives to solvent-based paints. The volatile organic
compound (VOC) content of waterborne paints is significantly lower than
conventional solvent-based paints, thereby reducing VOC emissions.
Waterborne (or latex) paints are composed of synthetic resins and pigments
that are kept dispersed in water by surfactants. They also contain small
amounts of coalescing solvents. Waterborne paints dry by evaporation of
the water. The coalescing solvents allow the resin particles to fuse
together (coalesce) as the water evaporates to form a continuous coating.
Waterborne paints must be protected from freezing and applied at a minimum
temperature of 50 degrees Fahrenheit.
Waterborne paints reduce VOC emissions and worker exposure to hazardous air pollutants. These paints can also reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated, depending on the type of paint used. Since waterborne coatings do not meet the requirements for solvent resistance and temperature as required for aerospace applications, these coatings are recommended by the Air Force for non-aerospace applications. The following is a description of nationally stock-listed latex paints:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Benefit: | Using a waterborne paint
decreases hazardous waste generation because overspray may be recaptured,
and the process does not generate spent cleanup solvents. This benefit
helps facilities meet the requirements of waste reduction under RCRA,
40 CFR 262, Appendix, and may also help facilities reduce their
generator status and lessen their regulatory burden under RCRA, 40 CFR
262 (i.e., recordkeeping, reporting, inspections, transportation,
accumulation time, emergency prevention and preparedness, emergency
response). In addition, waterborne paints do not contain the volume of
solvents that conventional paint contains and therefore, the possibility
that a facility meets any of the reporting thresholds of SARA Title III
(40 CFR 300, 355, 370, and 372; and EO 12856) for solvents is
decreased. Moreover, since the VOC content in waterborne paints is
significantly lower than conventional solvent paints, fewer VOCs are
emitted to the air, a factor which may lessen the likelihood that a
facility will require an air permit under 40 CFR 70 and 71.
The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Materials Compatibility: | Waterborne paints can rust plain steel and can sometimes attack aluminum. Application equipment must be constructed of a corrosion-resistant material such as 316 stainless steel. Waterborne coating material conducts high voltage electricity much more readily than solvent-based material. As a result, the electrostatics of a waterborne system will only work if all wetted equipment is isolated from potential grounds. Three methods can be used to avoid grounding out the electrostatics in a waterborne system: (1) isolate the entire paint system from electrical grounds; (2) isolate a small part of the wetted system with a voltage blocking device; and (3) indirectly charge the paint particles away from any of the wetted equipment. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages and should be evaluated for the specific application. The use of a voltage blocking device at each atomizer is often the most cost-effective method. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Safety and Health: | Health and safety issues are
reduced significantly by using waterborne paints. However, these paints
contain coalescing solvents that can be slight irritants by inhalation.
Proper personal protective equipment (PPE) is recommended.
Waterborne paints may also contain other solvents, such as butoxyethanol, isopropyl alcohol, and sec-butyl alcohol. These solvents have occupational exposure limits established by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), and/or Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disadvantages: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Analysis: | Solvent-based paint systems can
usually be converted to waterborne paint systems with a limited capital
investment. The cost of waterborne paints will vary depending on the
application used. In general, the price of waterborne paints is comparable
to the price of solvent-based paints.
Assumptions:
Annual Operating Cost Comparison for Waterborne Paint Application and Solvent Based Paint Application
Economic Analysis Summary Annual Savings for Waterborne Paint
Application: $2,027 Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values. To return from the Active Spreadsheet, click the reverse arrow in the Tool Bar. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Approving Authority: | Approval is controlled locally
and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been
granted. Major claimant approval is not required.
Technical Orders are the source of authority for all paints used on aerospace equipment by the Air Force. Only the waterborne epoxy is approved for use in T.O.1-1-8. |
NSN/MSDS: |
|
Points of Contact: | Army: Mr. Randy Doyle HQ III Corps & Fort Hood AT2F-PW-ENV, Bldg 429 Fort Hood, TX 76544 Phone: (254) 287-2718 DSN: 737-1099 | |
Navy: Mr. Rex Conner Naval Aviation Depot Naval Air Station Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL 32212-0016 Phone: (904) 542-5240 DSN: 942-5420 FAX: (904) 542-0691 |
Vendors: | This is not meant to be a
complete list, as there are other manufacturers of this type of
equipment.
Sherwin Williams |
Deft Inc. 17451 Von Karman Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 Phone: (949) 474-0400 FAX: (949) 474-7269 |
Sources: | R. Konieczynski, "Converting
to Waterbornes for Less Cost," Metal Finishing, January 1995, Vol. 93, No.
1, pp. 20-23. P. Bankert, "Waterborne Paint Circulation," Industrial Finishing, July 1990, Vol. 66, No. 7, pp. 42-43. "GM Adopts Waterborne Basecoats," Industrial Finishing, July 1990, p. 32 R. Joseph, "Environmental Coating Problems," Metal Finishing, May 1994, pp. 44-45. |
[Back]