UNICOAT PAINT TECHNOLOGY

Revision Date: 9/01
Process Code: Navy/Marines: ID-05-99; Air Force: PA01; Army: PNT
Usage: Navy: High; Marines: High;
Army: Medium; Air Force: Low
Compliance Impact: High
Alternative for: Epoxy Primer and Polyurethane Topcoat for Aircraft
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: Toluene (CAS: 108-88-3), Xylene (CAS: 1330-20-7), Methyl Ethyl Ketone (CAS: 78-93-3), Acetone (CAS: 67-64-1), N-butyl Alcohol (CAS: 71-36-3), Lead (CAS: 7439-92-1), Chromium (CAS: 7440-47-3), Zinc Compounds

Overview: The UNICOAT paint technology is a one coat painting system for aircraft that replaces the traditional two coat primer and topcoat systems. Since only one coat is applied instead of two coats, volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions and waste generated from cleanup operations may potentially be reduced by 50 to 70%.

UNICOAT, developed by Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) Warminster, is a self-priming topcoat for aircraft and other industrial applications that is applied directly to metal without a primer. UNICOAT, which is formulated lead and chrome-free, replaces the two-coat system with a blend of organic and inorganic zinc compounds that are nontoxic. UNICOAT, like traditional topcoats, is polyurethane; however, UNICOAT is different because corrosion inhibitors and adhesion promoters have been added. It has demonstrated equivalent or superior performance compared to the toxic paints that have been used in the past. A federal specification (TT-P-2756) has been developed for this technology.

The UNICOAT process does not contain chromates. As a result, the waste streams generated with the UNICOAT process are less hazardous than conventional processes. These waste streams include air emissions and wastes generated from cleanup operations. Since the UNICOAT process, a one-coat process, replaces a two-coat process, waste is reduced by approximately 50%.


Compliance Benefit: UNICOAT is a one coat painting system that can reduce air emissions and waste. The UNICOAT technology provides the following specific regulatory benefits:
  • Reduced emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvent cleaning and from paint since only one coat of paint is applied. VOCs are associated with the formation of smog and typically regulated by state and local air pollution control districts.
  • Reduced emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from solvent cleaning, which is regulated by Federal, state, and local regulations including the National Emissions Standards Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR 63).
  • Reduced storage and use of substances that are regulated by SARA Title III (TRI, Tier I /Tier II) if certain thresholds are exceeded (40 CFR 300, 355, 370, and 372; and EO 12856).
  • Reduced generation of waste cleaning solvents and waste paint that must be handled and disposed as hazardous waste under 40 CFR 260 and related sections.
  • Potentially reduced occupational exposures that are regulated under 29 CFR 1910.

Compliance benefits include:

  • reduced recordkeeping and reporting requirements under the Title V, NESHAP Program and SARA programs.
  • reduced administrative burden associated with hazardous waste (i.e., tracking, plans, reports, training).
  • reduced administrative burden associated with OSHA (i.e., training and recordkeeping).

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved (e.g., the amount of workload involved.)


Materials Compatibility:
Like traditional paint and primer applications, the surface to be painted needs to be cleaned appropriately. To avoid adverse reactions, freshly painted wet surfaces must not be allowed to come into contact with alcohols, amines, water, or acids. As the UNICOAT system does not contain chromates, which typically aid in corrosion control, there is the potential for corrosion of aluminum surfaces when using the UNICOAT process.


Safety and Health: UNICOAT contains VOCs (i.e. 420g/l). Inhalation of these compounds is the primary concern. Proper personal protective equipment should be used.

Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits:
  • Contains no toxic pigments (i.e. chromate, lead, etc.).
  • Reduces VOC emissions and hazardous waste generation by 50 - 70%.
  • Yields paint and primer cost savings of approximately 65%.
  • Reduced paint weight on equipment and aircraft.
  • Yields labor cost savings since only one coat is applied.
  • Yields stripping cost savings since only one coat is applied.


Disadvantages:
  • UNICOAT may not be suitable for all coating applications.
  • Increased labor and stripping costs due to corrosion and paint failure.
  • UNICOAT usage on Air Force aircraft has documented limitations when applied to the fleet of KC-135 aircraft, the paint did not perform well. The major problems involved poor adhesion, leading to corrosion problems due a lack of protection. UNICOAT is not approved for use on Air Force aircraft.


Economic Analysis: Costs will vary depending upon the specific application. The economic analysis presented below assumes that the purchase of new coating application devices is not required.

Assumptions:

  • 36 aircraft painted annually with a total surface area of 111,600 ft2 (3,100 ft2 per aircraft)
  • All paint is consumed and no waste is generated from painting operations
  • Thickness of all coatings: 1 mil
  • Surface area coated with one mil thickness: 842 ft2 per gallon
  • Gallons of UNICOAT used annually: 135 gallons
  • Gallons of epoxy primer used annually: 135 gallons
  • Gallons of topcoat used annually: 135 gallons
  • UNICOAT cost: $75/gallon
  • Epoxy primer cost: $70/gallon
  • Topcoat cost: $150/gallon
  • Labor required to apply one coat: 50 hours
  • Labor rate: $40/ hour

Annual Operating Cost Comparison for UNICOAT System and Two-Coat System

  UNICOAT Two-Coat System
Operational Costs:    
Labor: $72,000 $144,000
Material: $10,125 $29,700
Total Operational Costs: $82,125 $173,700
Total Recovered Income: $0 $0
Net Annual Cost/Benefit: -$82,125 -$173,700

Economic Analysis Summary

    Annual Savings for UNICOAT System: $91,575
    Capital Cost for Diversion Equipment/Process: N/A
    Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: Immediate

Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values. To return from the Active Spreadsheet, click the reverse arrow in the Tool Bar.


Approving Authority: Contact NAVAIR Code 4.3.4 for further approval authority for use on aircraft and aircraft components. Phone is (703) 604-3555; DSN: 664-3555. This process should be implemented only after cognizant authority has granted engineering approval.


NSN/MSDS:
Product NSN Unit Size Cost MSDS*
Paint/Full Gloss/Red 8010-01-354-0977 2 qt. $31.82 Click me
Paint/Semi-Gloss/Gry 8010-01-353-5756 2 gal. $105.55 Click me
Paint/Flat Fin./Brwn. 8010-01-376-3702 2 qt. $33.83 Click me


*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs.
The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.


Points of Contact: Air Force:
Mr. Dave Ellicks
Air Force Corrosion Program Office
AFRL/MLS-OLR
325 Richard Ray Boulevard
Robins AFB, GA 31098-1640
Phone: (478) 926-3284
DSN: 468-3284
FAX: (478) 926-6619

Navy:
Mr. Kevin Kovaleski
NAWCAD
Code 4341, Bldg. 2188
48066 Shaw Road Unit 5
Patuxent River, MD 20670-1908
Phone: (301) 342-8049
DSN: 342-8049
FAX: (301) 342-8199
Email:  kovaleskikj@navair.navy.mil

Mr. Bob Frederickson
Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, ESC 423
1100 23rd Avenue
Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370
Phone: (805) 982-4897
DSN: 551-4889
FAX: (805) 982-4832


Vendors: Deft Inc.
17451 Von Karman Avenue
Irvine,  CA   92614
Phone: (949) 474-0400 
FAX: (949) 474-7269
URL:  http://www.deftfinishes.com/


Sources: Mr. Anthony Eng, Naval Air Warfare Center, Patuxent River, MD.



[Back]