ODS-FREE SUBSTITUTE FOR GENERAL PURPOSE AEROSOL LUBRICANT
![]() |
|
Overview: | Several
general purpose lubricants/penetrants lacking ozone depleting substances
in their formulations are available for all-purpose use. These products
effectively lubricate and protect metals by providing a long-lasting lubricating
film that reduces friction and wear. The products are available in both
aerosol and non-aerosol forms. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Benefit: |
Use of an ODS-free general purpose aerosol lubricant will help facilities meet the requirements under 40 CFR 82, Subpart D and Executive Order 12843 requiring federal agencies to maximize the use of safe alternatives to Class I and Class II ozone depleting substances, to the maximum extent practicable. In addition, the elimination of ODSs at the facility decreases the possibility that the facility will meet any of the reporting thresholds for those chemicals under 40 CFR 355, 370 and EO 12856. Chemicals used as substitutions should be reviewed for SARA reporting issues. The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Materials Compatibility: |
In general, when using any of these lubricants, avoid contact with strong oxidizing agents. Always check with the manufacturer to verify material compatibility.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Safety and Health: |
Consult your local Industrial Health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing any of these technologies.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disadvantages: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Analysis: |
The following economic analysis was based on information provided by the vendors for the listed products. The cost elements are used in comparing BREAK-FREE CLP pump spray and WD-40® aerosol cans for lubrication. Assumptions:
Annual Operating Cost Comparison for Refillable Spray Bottles and Aerosol Sprays
Economic Analysis Summary
Capital Cost for Diversion Equipment/Process: $0 Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: N/A Note: Although ODC-free lubricants may be more expensive, they help reduce the levels of ODCs in the atmosphere. Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Approving Authority: |
Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NSN/MSDS: |
*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs. The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vendors: |
Break-Free, Inc. Ecolink, Inc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources: |
Mr. Dennis Harris, SAFR Program, AMCOM, Engineering
Group, January 1999 |