ODS-FREE SKIN REFRIGERANT
![]() |
|
Overview: |
The ozone depleting substance (ODS) CFC-114 has typically been used as a refrigerant spray for conducting cold-sensitivity studies at dental clinics. Alternatives are now available which utilize HFC-134a in place of CFC-114. Refrigerant sprays are applied by applying the refrigerant to a piece of cotton, then placing the cotton to the patient’s tooth. The dentist then observes the patient’s reaction and evaluates a course of action. These sprays are much colder than ice or ethyl chloride, at a temperature of approximately -20oC. These sprays have typically contained the ODS CFC-114, but now have been reformulated to incorporate HFC-134a instead. While not a class I ODS, HFC-134a is a green house gas and has a global warming potential. |
||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Benefit: |
Use of an ODS-free skin refrigerant will help facilities meet the requirements under 40 CFR 82, Subpart D and Executive Order 12843 requiring federal agencies to maximize the use of safe alternatives to class I and class II ozone depleting substances, to the maximum extent practicable. The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Materials Compatibility: |
No materials compatibility issues were identified.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Safety and Health: |
Consult your local Industrial Health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing any of these technologies.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Benefits: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Disadvantages: | None
identified. |
||||||||||||||||||
Economic Analysis: |
The U.S. EPA is currently phasing out Applications of R-114. The following economic analysis is based on vendor information and compares the use of a skin refrigerant which uses R-114 (NSN 6506-00-576-8915), and an alternative that uses HFC-134a. Assumptions:
Annual Operating Cost Comparison for R-114 and HFC-134a
Economic Analysis Summary
Capital Cost for Equipment/Process: $180 Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: N/A Note: Although the cost of R-114 is currently lower than the alternative, since this Class I ODS is currently prohibited from production and importation, the cost will increase making the alternative more economically viable. Click Here to view an Active Spreadsheet for this Economic Analysis and Enter Your Own Values. |
||||||||||||||||||
Approving Authority: |
Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required. |
||||||||||||||||||
NSN/MSDS: |
*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs. The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Points of Contact: |
Air Force: EPA:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Vendors: |
Coltene/Whaledent
|
||||||||||||||||||
Sources: |
None listed |