RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF HYDROFLUOROCARBONS
![]() |
|
Overview: |
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are being developed to replace Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) for use primarily in refrigeration and air conditioning equipment. HFCs are the next generation of refrigerants. They will substantially replace all the CFCs and HCFCs, since they do not have ozone depletion potential. Under section 608 of the Clean Air Act, it has been illegal since November 15, 1995, to knowingly vent substitutes for CFC and HCFC refrigerants during the maintenance, service, repair and disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment. On June 11, 1998, EPA proposed a regulation to fully implement this statutory venting prohibition. In brief, the proposed regulations would:
Section 608 directly prohibits the venting of substitute refrigerants during the maintenance, service, repair, and disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment unless EPA determines that the release of the substitute does not pose a threat to the environment. EPA is considering a number of factors in making this determination, including the substitute's toxicity, flammability, long-term environmental impact (such as global warming potential), and regulation under other authorities (such as OSHA or other EPA requirements). Based on these considerations, the following refrigerants are subject to the venting prohibition, and EPA is proposing to cover them under the regulations:
EPA is proposing to exempt the following refrigerants from the venting prohibition:
This proposed exemption applies only to applications of these refrigerants that have been approved under EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program. The applicability of recycling requirements to these substitutes in other applications (e.g., hydrocarbons in household refrigerators) will be considered when the substitutes in those applications are submitted for SNAP review. It may be dangerous to use CFC and HCFC recovery equipment to recover ammonia, hydrocarbons, or chlorine. However, users of hydrocarbon, ammonia, and pure chlorine refrigerants must continue to comply with all other applicable federal, state, and local restrictions on emissions of these substances. As is the case for CFC and HCFC refrigerants, only four types of releases of HFCs and PFCs are permitted under the prohibition:
|
||||||||||
Compliance Benefit: |
None noted.
|
||||||||||
Materials Compatibility: |
|
||||||||||
Safety and Health: |
Consult your local Industrial Health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing any of these technologies.
|
||||||||||
Benefits: |
|
||||||||||
Disadvantages: |
|
||||||||||
Economic Analysis: | Any replacements need to be evaluated
for a given application in order to determine the economic impact. Regardless
of any substitute’s cost, taxes on CFCs will continue to rise. |
||||||||||
Approving Authority: |
Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.
|
||||||||||
NSN/MSDS: |
*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs. The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.
|
||||||||||
Points of Contact: |
EPA: Navy:
|
||||||||||
Vendors: |
National Concrete Products
|
||||||||||
Sources: |
http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608/subvent.html |