SITE PLANNING

Revision Date: 8/01
Process Code: Navy/Marines: SR-04-00; Air Force: FA01, FA04; Army: N/A
Usage: Navy: Medium; Marines: Medium; Army: Medium; Air Force: Medium
Alternative for: Traditional site planning activities
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: N/A

Overview: Site planning involves the total physical planning scheme of a structure on undisturbed or disturbed land. The thoughtful placement of a building or structure on a site to promote energy conservation is integrated with factors to ensure that health, safety and welfare issues have been addressed to protect installation population and the surrounding community.

Site planning involves the thoughtful placement of a building on a site to promote energy conservation by taking advantage of natural site features such as breezes, sunlight, shade, and topography. Site selection has a major impact on the immediate natural community and the future occupants of the building. Minimal site clearing reduces costs, and undisturbed plant materials may provide a low-maintenance landscape that avoids supplemental irrigation and fertilizer.

Specific planning for building orientation permits passive design features and non-mechanical measures to conserve energy, utilize solar energy for thermal gain, and direct prevailing winds for natural ventilation and cooling. Natural conditions should be used to full potential to reduce the use of more expensive mechanical systems. Mature stands of native vegetation often provide the desired energy-saving shade and wind control that would otherwise require years to develop from expensive new plantings.

Planning a facility to ensure it is not located in a floodplain ensures that future costs due to flooding and equipment damage are avoided. Site planning is designed to enhance the sustainability of a project or facility from both the environmental perspective as well as the perspective of the mission of the particular military branch or unit building the facility.

Sustainable site planning should involve the following site considerations that will affect building design:

  • Natural and cultural resources present on site;
  • Geographical latitude (solar altitude) and microclimate factors, such as wind loads;
  • Topography and adjacent landforms;
  • Groundwater and surface runoff characteristics;
  • Solar access;
  • Air movement patterns (both annual and diurnal);
  • Soil texture and load-bearing capacity;
  • Parcel shape and access; and
  • Relationship to installation Comprehensive Plan.

Source: Sustainable Building Technical Manual

Each branch of the military has developed a mandatory site-planning checklist for evaluating a proposed site for development or alteration. The checklist is a required step in any civil engineering project. The checklist incorporates many sustainable attributes and each point corresponds with a more detailed reference document. These checklists include such sustainability issues as:

  • Preparing of Environmental Assessments or Environmental Impact Statements,
  • Complying with Environmental Impact Analysis Process policy,
  • Developing as few utility corridors as possible to avoid disturbing vegetation,
  • Building on land that has previously been disturbed,
  • Avoiding building near stream channels, floodplains, or designated wetlands,
  • Avoiding eligible/designated/suspected archaeological or historical sites,
  • Avoiding potential to affect threatened or endangered species or critical habitats, and
  • Avoiding siting on designated prime or unique farmlands.

Note: These are just a few issues excerpted from the Air Force Comprehensive Planning Draft Site Planning Checklist of January 7, 2000. Contact your Comprehensive Planner for more details. Beginning in the late 1970's the earliest versions of this checklist has served as an aid in the Air Force Site Planning process. Each item in the checklist is tied to a more detailed guide, process and procedure.

 

Compliance Benefit: Thoughtful site planning will help facilities meet the requirements under Executive Order 13101, requiring executive agencies (e.g., DOD) to incorporate waste prevention and recycling in their daily operations, and to consider the following factors in developing plans, drawings, work statements, specifications, or other materials; reuse of product; life-cycle cost; recyclability; use of environmentally preferable products; waste prevention (including toxicity reduction or elimination); and ultimate disposal, as appropriate.

This activity also helps facilities to comply iwth the Department of navy's Naval Facilities Engineering Command Planning and Design Policy Statement - 98-01:  Design of Sustainable Facilities and Infrastructure, June 18, 1998, which requires all facilities and infrastructure-related design and construction for the Navy, Air Force (when Navy is the design agent on the project), and Marines, as well as about half of domestic Army construction and about half of all offshore military construction.

Implementing sustainable development strategies, such as careful site planning, also will help facilities meet requirements under the Department of the Army Technical Letter No. 1110-3-491, "Sustainable Design for Military Facilities," released on May 1, 2001.  This letter provides basic criteria for incorporating sustainable design concepts in the design and construction of Military facilities.

Identifying potential environmental impacts and the need for environmental compliance permits during project planning will allow sufficient time to obtain necessary permits before construction and operation.  It also will allow the project design team to consider and mitigate the negative environmental impacts identified in the planning process.

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted.  Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g., the amount of workload involved.

 

Materials Compatibility:
No materials compatibility issues were identified.

 

Safety and Health: No major safety or health issues associated with site planning were identified.  Consult you local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this activity.

 

Benefits:
  • Conserves habitat and other natural and cultural resources.
  • Reduces energy use and the costs associated.
  • Reduces pollution associated with energy production.
  • Reduces contamination of stormwater runoff.
  • Improves health, safety, and welfare of personnel.

 

Disadvantages:
  • Requires thoughtful planning from the beginning stages of building design and construction.
  • May restrict the design of a structure.

 

Economic Analysis: The costs incurred in site planning will vary depending upon the characteristics of the potential sites.  Economic data are specific to each application, and comparisons among other systems would not be applicable.  The principle costs that need to be considered are:
  • Costs for initial planning studies and impact statements.
  • Costs to protect existing natural and cultural resources.
  • Any changes in labor or other supplies necessary to prepare site with less impact to local environment.
  • Costs avoided by taking advantage of natural features to improve energy efficiency.

 

Approving Authority: Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.

 

NSN/MSDS:
Product NSN Unit Size Cost MSDS*
None Identified        


*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs.
The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.

 

Points of Contact: Air Force:
Mr. Roger Blevins, AICP, GM-14
Program Manager
Air Force Comprehensive Planning
HQ AFCEE/ECC
3207 North Road
Brooks AFB, TX  78235
Phone:  (210) 536-3798
DSN: 240-3798
FAX:  (210) 536-3890
DSN FAX: 240-2890
Email:  roger.blevins@brooks.af.mil
URL: http://www.afcee.brooks.af.mil/mmgpg

 

Vendors: None identified.

 

Sources: Environmental Building News- Building Green, Inc., 122 Birge Street, Suite 30, Brattleboro, VT  05301.
ERF Guide, http://www.afcee.brooks.af.mil/green/facilitiesguide/facguide.asp
Greening Federal Facilities, Federal Energy Management Program, www.eren.doe.gov/femp/greenfed.
Sustainable Building Technical Manual, Center of Excellence for Sustainable Development, www.sustainable.doe.gov/articles/ptipub.htm
Draft Site Planning Checklist, Air Force Comprehensive Planning, January 7, 2000.

 


[Back]