SURFACE COATING TECHNOLOGY AIR EMISSIONS - OVERVIEW

Revision Date: 11/00
Process Code: Navy and Marine Corps: ID-06-00; Air Force: PA01; Army: PNT
Usage: Navy: High Air Force: High Army: High Marine Corps: High
Compliance Impact: Low
Alternative for: Alternative to Conventional Coating Systems with High Emissions Contents
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: Acetone (CAS: 67-64-1), n-Butanol (CAS: 71-36-3), Chromium (CAS: 7440-47-3), Cyanide Compounds, Lead (CAS: 7439-92-1), Methyl Ethyl Ketone (CAS: 78-93-3), Toluene (CAS: 108-88-3), Xylenes (CAS: 1330-20-7), and Zinc Compounds

Overview:

The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) to establish standards that limit hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from various sources. There are 188 CAA-regulated HAPs, which include many of the solvents commonly used in surface coating. Many of these solvents are VOCs. EPA is currently engaged in the development of regulations for a number of categories of industrial surface coating operations and composite operations. Collectively known as the Coatings and Composites Coordinated Rule (CCCR), the regulations under development are national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPs) under Section 112 of the CAA and for some of the categories, national VOC rules or control technique guidelines (CTG) under Section 183(e) of the Act. The Agency has already promulgated regulations covering the surface coating activities of aerospace facilities and shipbuilding operations. EPA is expected to issue final NESHAPs or Section 183(e) rules for the remaining categories included in the CCCR by May 2002. Examples of remaining categories include automobiles and light-duty trucks, plastic parts, and miscellaneous metal parts.

These new standards will apply to facilities engaged in the surface coating of synthetic polymer components; facilities engaged in the coating of a wide range of metal products that vary in size, shape, application method, and use; and vehicle assembly operations that apply primers, guide coat/primer surfacers, top coats, and other related coatings. New surface coating technologies have lower VOCs and HAPs content than the conventional coating systems because of the reduced solvent concentration in the formulation, and due to improved coating chemistries. Six of the technologies are briefly described below, including reference to a Joint Service Pollution Prevention Technical Library data sheet, if applicable.

Powder Coating:
Powder coating paint systems, also referred to as "dry painting," apply finely ground thermosetting or thermoplastic powders, usually by electrostatic means, followed by curing to melt and fuse the powder into a continuous coating. Powder coating has no VOC content, and the HAPs content is considerably reduced because of the absence of solvents in the coatings. The presence of HAPs in the coating is dependent on the specific formulation of the coating.

Joint Service Pollution Prevention Technical Library Data sheet: Section 4-5, Powder Coating Painting System.

High-Solids Coatings:
High solids coatings are one- or two-component systems based on acrylic, alkyd, epoxy, polyester, or urethane resins and can be cured at ambient temperatures or in high temperature bake ovens. High-solids coatings and primers contain higher concentrations (40 to nearly 100 percent) of non-volatile organics than conventional paints (which typically contain 8 to 30 percent solids) because the high solids formulations use low-molecular weight resins and require less solvent to attain the viscosity needed for the application. Depending on the coating formulation, the VOC concentrations of high-solids coatings typically range from 0 to 60 percent. HAPs from the application of high-solids coatings tend to be less than with conventional coatings because of the reduced solvent concentrations. Emissions of non-solvent HAPs, such as isocyanatyes and chromates, are specific to the coating.

Waterborne Coatings
Waterborne coatings differ from conventional coatings in that water is substituted for certain organic solvents in the coating and is used as the dispersal medium for synthetic resins and pigments in the coatings. These types of coatings may still contain between 5 to 20 percent organic solvents for wetting, viscosity control, and pigment dispersion. The organic solvents in the paint allow the particles of resin to coalesce, as the water evaporates, to form a continuous coating. The HAPs content tends to be lower because of the reduced solvent concentrations. Concentrations of metals and other HAPs are specific to the type of paint used.
Joint Service Pollution Prevention Technical Library Data sheet: Section 4-7, Waterborne Paint.

UNICOAT
UNICOAT was originally developed at the Naval Warfare Center (NAWC) Warminster. It now refers to a self-priming topcoat for aircraft that replaces the traditional primer/topcoat systems. UNICOAT is a polyurethane that provides the adhesion and corrosion resistance of a primer and the chemical resistance, durability, and flexibility of the original topcoat. It is lead-free, chromate-free, and a blend of non-toxic, organic, and inorganic zinc compounds; however the polyurethane chemistry is based on isocyanates which, according to the Naval Air Warfare Center Patuxent, has a "free" monomer (usually 0.5% by mass or less) that is a HAP, which may be released during mixing and spraying. UNICOAT complies with the VOC levels of 420 grams per liter (g/L), thereby reducing VOC emissions and hazardous waste generation by 50 to 70 percent.
Joint Service Pollution Prevention Technical Library Data sheet: Section 4-6, UNICOAT Paint Technology.

Radiation Curable Coatings
Radiation-Curable Coatings are especially formulated to cure quickly by exposure to ultraviolet light (UV), electron beam (EB), infrared (IR), or microwave radiation. IR is sometimes included in the radiation-curable category, but in reality, IR is an improved method of transferring thermal energy to a coated part. IR can be used with any coating material to accelerate the curing process where a conventional oven is typically used. Radiation-Curable Coatings have a higher solids content and consist of a low-molecular weight resin, a reactive solvent containing unsaturated groups, and a photoinitiator (only contained in UV-curable coatings). Radiation-Curable Coatings are usually clear, but can be pigmented and tend to exhibit good resistance to abrasion, heat staining, and weathering. According to the Concurrent Technologies Corporation, radiation curable coatings are available in zero-VOC. The HAPs content of these coatings is dependent on the composition of the specific coating, but should be less than that found in conventional coatings.

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Spraying
Supercritical CO2 Spraying is a paint-spraying process that substitutes CO2, above its critical temperature and pressure, for approximately 20-60 percent of the solvents that are used in conventional coating formulations. Supercritical CO2 reduces paint viscosity and produces a vigorous atomization and a quality finish. VOC content and emissions may be reduced up to 60 percent, and HAPs emissions can lowered by as much as 90 percent.


Compliance Benefit: Use of alternative surface coating technologies can help facilities comply with EPA's NESHAP for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair - Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (40 CFR 63, Subpart II) and for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities (40 CFR 63, Subpart GG). Additionally, these alternative technologies may help facilities comply with the upcoming surface coating regulations. For other specific compliance benefits see referenced Joint Service Pollution Prevention Technical Library data sheets.

The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.

 

Materials Compatibility:
Materials compatibility depends on the alternative surface coating methods implemented. Considerations can include (1) working on pieces that can be oven-heated and (2) damages to the work pieces from alcohol, ketones, and ethers. Testing will reveal damage. Consult the appropriate Joint Services Pollution Prevention Technical Library data sheet or point of contact for more information.


Safety and Health: Health and safety concerns may significantly be reduced by using these new technologies. Consult the material safety data sheets (MSDS) of the particular paint to ensure proper use and that all necessary safety requirements (e.g., personal protective equipment, increased ventilation, fire fighting equipment) can be met. Consult your local industrial health specialist and your local health and safety personnel prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits: Reduces the amounts of VOCs and HAPs emitted into the environment and improves the ability of installations to comply with EPA's current and future emission standards for surface coating.
Disadvantages: Whenever a new procedure is implemented, there will be a certain amount of "down time" while the technicians learn the new process to achieve the desired finish quality. However, this is to be expected in any process improvement.


Economic Analysis: Cost will vary depending on the specific application or coating method used. The economic feasibility of implementing an alternative technology should be evaluated for each application prior to conversion. Consult the appropriate Joint Service Pollution Prevention Technical Library data sheets or point of contact for more information.


NSN/MSDS:
Product NSN Unit Size Cost
None Identified


Approval Authority: Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.


Points of Contact : Mr. Michael J. Docherty
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
100 CTC Drive
Johnstown, PA 15904
Phone: (814) 269-6462
Fax: (814) 269-2798
docherty@ndcee.ctc.com

Navy:
Mr. Scott Mauro
Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, ESC423
1100 23rd Avenue
Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370
Phone: (805) 982-4889
DSN: 551-4889
Fax: (805) 982-4832

Dr. Kevin Kovaleski
Naval Air Warfare Center
Aircraft Division
Code 4.3.4.1, Mail Stop 3, Bldg. 2188
Patuxent River, MD 20670-5304
Phone: (301) 342-8049

Air Force:
Staff Sergeant Benjamin Lee
92MS/LGMSME
201 West Arnold, Suite 101
Fairchild AFB, WA 99011
Phone: (509) 247-3610
DSN: 657-3610


Vendors:

This list is not meant complete, other suppliers of this type of equipment may be available.

Cardinal Industrial Finishes
Powder Coating Division
1329 Potrero Ave.
South El Monte, CA 91733-3088
Phone: (626) 444-9274 Fax: (626) 444-0382


Sources: Dr. Kevin Kovaleski, Naval Air Warfare Center, Patuxent River, November 1999.
Mr. Michael Docherty, Concurrent Technologies Corporation, November 1999.

Air Quality Management Using Pollution Prevention: A Joint Service Approach, March 1998.


[Back]