![]() |
|
Overview: | Ships with water compensating fuel systems (WCFS) are not allowed to discharge compensating ballast water overboard in some navy ports. Navy ship destroyers (e.g. Spruance and Kidd class) and cruisers (Ticonderoga class) are designed with WCFS to enhance ship stability. During refueling, fuel displaces the compensating ballast water inside the fuel tanks directly through the ship's overboard discharge ports. The compensating ballast water (or compwater) poses an environmental risk due to the presence of small amounts of fuel oil. Currently, Alaska, Washington (Puget Sound), Canada (Esquimalt), and some parts of the East Coast have a "zero discharge" standard and do not allow ships with WCFS to refuel in-port unless the compwater is collected for processing ashore. It is anticipated that compwater discharges will be regulated Navy-wide in the near future.
There are currently no standard methods for the collection and treatment of compwater onshore. Large volumes and high discharge rates of compwater can be encountered during ship's refueling evolution making this problem unique and challenging. Current treatment and disposal cost of oily waste is very high and significant cost savings can be realized with a new approach. NFESC, through funding by NAVFAC, is developing a cost-effective method to collect and treat compwater on shore. The system being developed will utilize a barge as the collection mechanism and a simple cyclone oil/water separator for the removal of waste constituents. The treated effluent will be of sufficient quality to meet pretreatment standards or POTW limits. The savings will be derived from avoiding the more expensive treatment of oily/waste through a typical oily/waste treatment plant (e.g. BOWTS), a process that uses chemicals, and is more labor extensive. |
Compliance Benefit: | The use of of this type of system can help facilities meet pretreatment standards for discharges of wastewater into a POTW (40 CFR 403) or meet effluent limits of a NPDES permit (40 CFR 122).
The compliance benefits listed here are only meant to be used as a general guideline and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual compliance benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved. |
Materials Compatibility: | No materials compatibility issues were identified. |
Safety and Health: | N/A |
Benefits: |
|
Disadvantages: |
|
Economic Analysis: | The average oily waste treatment cost is 25 cents per gallon. The proposed, barge mounted treatment system could process the relatively clean compwater for 1.6 cents per gallon. With average refueling evolution discharges of 200,000 gallons of compwater per ship and an average ship refueling once every two months, an activity could save approximately $280K/yr/ship. To this writing, there are currently 78 navy ships with compwater system, the approximate savings Navy-wide could reach over $20M/yr. |
Approving Authority: | Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required. |
NSN/MSDS: |
*There are multiple MSDSs for most NSNs. The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.
|
Points of Contact: |
Navy: Mr. Sonny F. Maga Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center Code 421 1100 23rd Avenue Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370 Phone: (805) 982-1340 DSN: 551-1340
Mr. Scott Mauro
|
Sources: | None listed |