CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS

Revision Date: 9/01
Process Code: Navy and Marine Corps: ID-01-08/-09/-10/-11; Air Force: CL04; Army: CLD, PNT, VHM
Usage: Navy: Medium; Air Force: Medium; Army: Medium; Marine Corps: Medium
Alternative for: Other Storm Water Containment/Treatment Methods
Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: N/A

Overview: Constructed wetlands are defined as a water quality best management practice (BMP) designed to improve storm water quality. Using constructed storm water wetlands is an effective, aesthetic method to naturally remove pollutants from storm water before they reach critical habitats. Natural wetlands remove contaminants such as pesticides, metals, oils, nutrients, and sediments from water through naturally occurring biological chemical and physical mechanisms. Storm water treatment wetlands are small constructed ecosystems designed to enhance storm water quality that has become contaminated as a result of urbanization and development. By temporarily storing storm water runoff in shallow pools, constructed storm water wetlands create favorable growing conditions for emergent and riparian wetland plants. Therefore, the system is able to function similarly to natural wetlands to treat storm water runoff through uptake, retention, and settling. The constructed wetlands for storm water management provide significant pollutant removal by sedimentation, adsorption, biodegradation, filtration and bioaccumulation, while supplying wildlife habitat and aesthetic appeal. The use of constructed storm water technology is currently being used by the Navy and the Air National Guard.


Compliance Benefit: Benefits of constructed wetlands include compliance with federal state or local regulations regarding storm water runoff and non-point source (NPS) pollution. Rules promulgated for the 1987 Amendments to the Clean Water Act regarding storm water discharges are found in Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 122-124. These rules establish an application process for obtaining NPDES storm water discharge permits and categorizes storm water discharges as either "Phase I" or "Phase II." Phase I storm water discharges are those having the greatest potential to contaminate runoff and include industrial sectors such as manufacturing, transportation, landfills, certain wastewater treatment facilities, hazardous waste treatment/storage/disposal areas, large municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s), and large construction sites (over 5 acres). Phase II storm water discharges are those not addressed under Phase I of the program and include runoff from golf courses, housing areas, small construction sites (between 1 and 5 acres), large parking areas, gas stations, and MS4s serving populations less than 100,000. Under the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) storm water regulations and general permits applying to Phase I discharges, military installations have several industrial categories/processes that may require permitting including aircraft, plating, transportation, and solid/liquid waste stream management systems and activities. EPA published its final rule for Phase II storm water discharges in Vol-64, No. 235 of the Federal Register on 8 December 1999. Construction of storm water wetlands can help reduce compliance issues from non-point source pollution to water supplies.

The Compliance Benefits listed here are only meant to be used as general guidelines and are not meant to be strictly interpreted. Actual Compliance Benefits will vary depending on the factors involved, e.g. the amount of workload involved.


Materials Compatibility:
No material compatibility issues were determined; however, wetlands cannot be used to remove all types of contaminants.


Safety and Health: Improved worker safety and health through potentially decreased contact with containerized hazardous wastes.  Consult your local industrial health specialist and your local health and safety personnel prior to implementing this technology.


Benefits: The following benefits are possible with this system:
  • Increased productivity by reducing maintenance hours compared to conventional treatment systems Cost reduction through reduced operation and maintenance costs.
  • Reduced waste disposal costs.
  • Reduce eye sores associated with conventional treatment systems.
  • Added open space, green space, and wildlife elements.
  • Enhanced aesthetic appeal.
  • Minimal maintenance required.
  • Enhanced community relations through favorable land use policy.
  • Compliance with federal, state, and local regulations regarding storm water runoff and NPS pollution.
  • Helping installations meet required “Best Management Practices” in applying Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans. 
  • Reduced runoff velocities due to sheet flow conditions.
  • Elimination of environmentally damaging contaminants from point and non-point sources.
  • Elimination of sediments and suspended solids in surface water through settling and erosion control.
  • Elimination of noise and energy pollution found in the operation of conventional wastewater treatment plants.
  • Constructed storm water wetlands are widely applicable where land is available.


Disadvantages: The following potential disadvantages exist with this system:
  • Care must be given to designing the proper water elevations and vegetation types.
  • Not all contaminants can be treated.


Economic Analysis: Wetlands have significantly lower total costs and some times lower capital costs than conventional treatment systems. They have low operation and maintenance costs, an ability to tolerate fluctuations in flow and pollutant concentrations, provide flood protection, facilitate water reuse and recycling, create habitats for organisms and wildlife, enhance aesthetics of open spaces, and create recreational and education opportunities. These benefits are difficult to quantify economically. The cost of a constructed storm water wetland is approximately $300,000; however, this cost can vary significantly depending upon volume and flow rate requirements.


Approving Authority: Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required. Approval should be coordinated with local NPDES implementing agencies.


NSN/MSDS:
Product NSN Unit Size Cost MSDS*
None Identified        

*There are multiple MSDSx for most NSNs.
The MSDS (if shown above) is only meant to serve as an example.


Points of Contact: Navy:
Barbara Sugiyama
ESC 411
NFESC
Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center
1100 23rd Avenue
Port Hueneme, CA  93043
Phone:  (805) 982-1668
FAX:  (805) 982-4304
DSN: 551-1668
sugiyamabm@nfesc.navy.mil

Air Force:
Environmental Conservation Directorate
HQ Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence
3207 North Road
Brooks AFB, TX  78235-5363
Phone:  (210) 536-3907
FAX:  (210) 536-1194
DSN: 240-3907
http://www.afcee.brooks.af.mil/EC


Vendors: Not applicable.


Sources: “Wetlands,” PRO-ACT Fact Sheet, May 1999
“Use of Constructed Wetlands for Stormwater Runoff,” Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, found at http://www.dnr.cornell.edu/ext/wetlands
“Constructed Wetlands for Urban Stormwater Management, Mobile, Alabama,” Donald Surrency, US Department of Agriculture, found at http://www.ga.nrcs.usda.gov/ga/pmc/technical/alwetlands.htm
“Constructed Wetlands – A Stormwater Solution That Works,” Region 4, US Environmental Protection Agency, found at http://www.epa.gov/region4/water/wetlands/education/localgovt_1.html
“Guiding Principles for Constructed Treatment Wetlands: Providing for Water Quality and Wildlife Habitat,” Interagency Workgroup on Constructed Wetlands (EPA, USDA, USFWS, NMFS, USBR, USACE), EPA 843-B-00-003, October 2000



[Back]