G93-1182-A

A University of Nebraska NebGuide Publication

Best Management Practices for Agricultural Pesticides to Protect Water Resources

This NebGuide discusses what happens to pesticides after application, factors affecting pesticide movement, and best management practices to minimize the potential for pesticide contamination of ground and surface water.


Robert J. Wright, South Central Research and Extension Center, Clay Center
John F. Witkowski, Northeast Research and Extension Center, Concord
and Larry D. Schulze, Environmental Programs, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

| |

Users of pesticides and other agricultural chemicals must take appropriate precautions to reduce the risks of moving these materials into ground or surface water. The primary consideration should be whether the chemical is needed. If pesticides are needed, then the characteristics of the chemical, the sensitivity of the application site and the method of application should be considered.

The simplest way to minimize the potential for pesticide movement into water is to reduce or eliminate pesticide use. This can be accomplished by substituting nonchemical control measures for pesticides, where possible, and by using recommended Best Management Practices to minimize pest populations and reduce the need to use pesticides, thus protecting water resources. If pesticides are to be used, proper handling and application according to label instructions is essential. Select an effective pesticide for the intended use and, where possible, use those with lower human and environmental risk.

Factors affecting pesticide fate after application

It is important to understand what happens to pesticides after they are applied in the field. Not all of the applied chemical reaches the target site, some may drift downwind and outside the intended application site, possibly to nontarget sites, including surface water. pesticides should only be applied when drift potential is low (see NebGuide G90-1001, Spray Drift of pesticides). Of the pesticide remaining at the application site, three major processes determine its fate: adsorption, transfer and degradation (see Figure 1).

diagram: the fate processes of pesticides

Figure 1. The fate processes of pesticides.

Adsorption is the chemical process that results in a pesticide being bound or adsorbed to a soil particle. For example, portions of a pesticide molecule may bind electrically to clay minerals or organic matter.

Transfer refers to processes that move the pesticide away from the application site and includes volatilization, runoff, leaching, absorption and crop removal. Sometimes pesticide transfer is essential for pest control. For example, certain preemergence herbicides must move within the soil to reach germinating weed seeds. Volatilization occurs when a liquid or solid converts to a gas and moves away from the initial application site. Runoff occurs when water is added to a field faster than it can be absorbed into the soil. pesticides may move with runoff as compounds dissolved in the water or attached to soil particles. Leaching is the downward movement of chemical through the soil, eventually reaching the groundwater. Absorption is the uptake of pesticides or other chemicals into the plant or animal. After absorption, the pesticide residue may be broken down or remain in the plant or animal until harvest. Crop removal through harvest or grazing may move pesticide residue.

Degradation is the process of pesticide breakdown after application by either microbial action, chemical action or photodegradation. This process may take hours, days, weeks or years, depending on environmental conditions and the chemical characteristics of the pesticide.

The factors influencing whether pesticides will be leached into groundwater include characteristics of the soil and the pesticide, and their interaction with water from irrigation or rainfall. These factors are summarized in Table I. Similar factors influence pesticide movement in surface runoff, except that pesticides with low water solubility may move with surface runoff if they are strongly adsorbed to soil particles and have some degree of persistence. As shown in Table I, soil characteristics are important to pesticide movement. For example, clay soils have a high capacity to adsorb many chemicals including pesticides and soil nutrients. Sandy soils have a much lower capacity to adsorb pesticides. Organic matter in the soil also can adsorb pesticides. Soil structure influences the movement of water and pesticides. Coarse textured sandy soils with large macropores allow more rapid movement of water than fine textured or compacted soils with fewer macropores. Other characteristics of the site, such as depth to groundwater, or distance to surface water, are important. Finally, the pattern of water falling on the soil through irrigation or rainfall is significant. Small volumes of water at infrequent intervals are less likely to move pesticides than large volumes of water at more frequent intervals.

Table I. Summary of groundwater contamination potential as influenced by water, pesticide and soil characteristics.

Risk of groundwater contamination
Low risk High risk
pesticide characteristics
Water solubility low high
Soil adsorption high low
Persistence low high
Soil characteristics
Texture fine clay coarse sand
Organic matter high low
Macropores few, small many, large
Depth to groundwater deep
(100 ft or more)
shallow
(20 ft or less)
Water volume
Rain/irrigation small volumes at
infrequent intervals
large volumes at
frequent intervals
Based on: McBride, D. K. 1989. Managing pesticides to prevent groundwater contamination. North Dakota State University Extension Service, Publication E-979.

pesticide characteristics (see Table I) are also important and include solubility in water, tendency to adsorb to the soil, and persistence in the environment (or half-life). pesticides with high water solubility, low tendency to adsorb to soil particles and long persistence or half-life have the highest potential to move into water. These three factors, soil adsorption, water solubility and persistence, are commonly used to rate pesticides for their potential to leach or move with surface runoff after application. Soil adsorption is measured by Koc, which is the tendency of pesticides to be attached to soil particles. Higher values (greater than 1000) indicate a pesticide that is very strongly attached to soil and is less likely to move unless soil erosion occurs. Lower values (less than 300-500) indicate pesticides that tend to move with water and have the potential to leach or move with surface runoff.

Solubility is measured in parts per million (ppm) and measures how easily a pesticide may be washed off the crop, leach into the soil or move with surface runoff. pesticides with solubilities of less than 1 ppm tend to remain on the soil surface. They tend not to be leached, but may move with soil sediment in surface runoff if soil erosion occurs. pesticides with solubilities greater than 30 ppm are more likely to move with water.

pesticide persistence is measured in terms of the half-life, or the time in days required for a pesticide to degrade in soil to one-half its original amount. For example, if a pesticide has a half-life of 15 days, 50 percent of the pesticide applied will still be present 15 days after application and half of that amount (25 percent of the original) will be present after 30 days. In general, the longer the half-life, the greater the potential for pesticide movement. A pesticide with a half-life greater than 21 days may persist long enough to leach or move with surface runoff before it degrades.

No one factor--adsorption, water solubility, or persistence--can be used to predict pesticide behavior. It is the interaction of these factors and their interaction with the particular soil type and environmental conditions that determines pesticide behavior in the field.

Risk estimates for pesticide contamination of water

An example of rating the risk of some common pesticides according to the three factors, adsorption, water solubility and persistence, is shown in Table II. More detailed information on these and additional pesticides is available at your local Soil Conservation Service (SCS) office. SCS maintains a pesticide database and a field soil series database which characterizes each as to its potential for loss from leaching or surface runoff. They have developed a procedure to combine the pesticide rating and the soil type rating to compute an overall rating of the potential of a particular field to have pesticide movement by leaching or surface runoff. Caution: The values in Table II are approximations and may vary depending on environmental factors at an individual site. The ratings for movement by leaching or surface runoff do provide relative risk estimates however, and are useful for comparisons between products.

Table II. Physical properties of some commonly used pesticides and ratings for potential of off-site movement through surface water runoff or leaching.
pesticide
Common name
(Brand name)
Soil Sorption
Indexa
Water
Solubilityb
Soil
Half-lifec
Rating for movement by
Surface
Runoff
Leaching

(Koc) (ppm) (days)
alachlor
(Lasso)
170 240 15 Medium Medium
atrazine
(Aatrex)
100 33 60 Medium Large
carbaryl
(Sevin)
200 114 10 Medium Small
carbofuran
(Furadan)
22 351 50 Small Large
chlorpyrifos
(Lorsban)
6,070 2 30 Large Small
fonofos
(Dyfonate)
532 13 45 Large Medium
methyl parathion
(Penncap-M)
5,100 60 5 Medium Small
metolachlor
(Dual)
200 530 20 Medium Medium
permethrin
(Ambush, Pounce)
86,600 0.2 32 Large Small
terbufos
(Counter)
3,000 5 5 Medium Small
Source: R. L. Becker et al. (1989) Minnesota Extension Service AG-BU-3911.
aValues greater than 1000 indicate a pesticide is strongly attached to the soil.
bValues of 1 ppm or less are low in solubility and tend not to leach.
cValues greater than 21 days may persist in the soil long enough to leach or move with surface water.

When pesticides need to be used, selections should be influenced by the specific characteristics of each field. Consider the potential for leaching or surface water runoff, and avoid using pesticides with high potential for leaching or runoff on sensitive sites.

Best Management Practices to protect water resources

Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the context of this discussion, are defined as practices which reduce the potential for pesticides moving into water either by surface runoff or by leaching into groundwater. Although not an inclusive list, the following BMPs are suggested for incorporation into all farming and ranching operations:

Summary

For environmental stewardship, adopt pesticide best management practices. The following practices will reduce the potential for pesticide contamination of groundwater and surface water:

up arrow


File G1182 under: WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
A-12, Water Quality

Issued October 1993; 12,500 printed.

Electronic version issued August 1996
pubs@unl.edu


Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Kenneth R. Bolen, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.