The University of
Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental
Sciences Cooperative Extension Service
Managing
the High Producing Dairy Cow
Lane 0.
Ely and Larry D. Guthrie, Extension Dairy Scientists
Contents
40,000
Pounds of Milk Lactation/Gestation
Cycle Feeding
Maintaining
Intake Milking
Heat
Stress Management
Suggested
Readings
All dairy farmers would like
to increase milk production from their cows. If we examine the DHIA
records, milk production has been increasing steadily over the
years. Still there is a long way to go for the average herd to
become a top herd. What is a high producing dairy cow? Many herds
today have rolling herd averages of over 20,000 pounds of milk and
many cows are producing over 30,000 pounds of milk. The Georgia DHIA
rolling herd average, however, is 13,500 pounds of milk. To see what
changes we can make, let's examine the individual record holder.
Beecher Arlinda Ellen
set the production record in 1975 by producing 55,661 pounds of milk
in 365 days (Table 1). Her top production day was 195 pounds and she
averaged 152.5 pounds of milk per day. She milked 112 pounds on her
last test day. During the peak of lactation she ate over 65 pounds
of 16 percent commercial grain, 70 pounds of alfalfa hay, and she
drank 50 to 60 gallons of water per day. Ellen was an exceptional
cow in both milk production and her ability to eat. She consumed
over 7 percent of body weight as dry matter the average cow eats 3
to 5 percent of her body weight. Ellen was fed frequently and always
had fresh feed available. Her owners commented on her agressive
eating habits and easy disposition. She liked interaction with
people and other animals.
We can see many of
Ellen's characteristics in the 20,000 pound herds. We want to be
able to take advantage of them so our cows can express their genetic
potential and efficiency. Even though costs will increase with
higher production; returns will increase more.
All cows go through a
lactation/gestation cycle which can be divided into five groupings.
The first period of the lactational cycle is peak milk production.
During this period the high producing cow must draw upon body
reserves to meet her nutritional requirements. Usually the high
producing cow will lose body weight during this period.
The second period is
when maximum dry matter intake occurs. This level of intake will
determine the shape of the milk production curve as the cow starts
to decline in milk production. Body weight will stabilize and may
show a slight increase. Cows should be bred by the early part of
this period in order to maintain a reasonable calving interval.
The third period of the
lactational cycle is a period of excess nutrient intake and gain of
body stores for the next lactation. Body weight increases so that
the cow reaches the desired calving weight by the end of this
period. This phase may not occur in high producing herds because of
the high level of milk production. With high milk production, cows
may never reach a period of excess nutrient intake. The quality of
the ration will be all the more critical because the cow will not
have a large body reserve to draw on in the subsequent lactation.
The fourth period is
the typical dry cow period where the goal is to restore the rumen to
a healthy fermentation vat. This is accomplished by feeding a ration
composed of long hay. Body weight changes should be positive but not
large.
The last period in the
lactational cycle is the close-up dry period. This is a transitional
phase that allows the cow to adjust to the milking herd ration and
to being moved into the milking herd.
Feeding the high
producing dairy cow is a continual challenge, especially in early
lactation, when dry matter intake may be limited. As can be seen in
Table 2, not only does the requirement for nutrients increase with
higher milk production, but also the nutrient density because of the
limited intake.
The first approach to
meeting her needs is having the best quality forage available. To
keep the rumen functioning optimally, forage or roughage must make
up 40 percent of the cow's intake. Only high quality forages (see
suggested readings for references) will allow rations to be as
balanced as those in Table 3.
The grain portion of
the ration is often limited in energy. High energy feeds such as
added fat or whole seeds (such as cottonseed or soybean seed) are
well utilized by the cow, but because of their laxative effects,
they should be used in limited amounts.
The key to getting high
milk production is keeping the cow on feed. Every time the cow goes
off feed she will decrease her milk production. Not only is milk
production lost, but because some secretary tissue is lost, she
never quite recovers her production potential. If she can be kept on
feed and healthy then she has a chance to produce at her maximum.
You can do several
things to help the dairy cow to remain on feed. If ration
ingredients must be changed, especially forage, change them
gradually over a two week period so both the cow and the rumen
microbes can adjust. Keeping fresh feed in front of the cow also
helps stimulate intake, while frequent feedings encourage the cow to
return to the feed bunk. Total mixed rations or at least frequent
feedings of grain will help maintain the rumen in balance and allow
optimal fermentation.
Milking three times a
day has been shown to increase milk production by 20 to 25 percent.
This may be helpful to high producing cows because milking relieves
pressure build up in the mammary gland and allows the gland to
continue to produce milk. However, if the feeding program is not
adapted to the higher level of milk production, the cow will lose
body weight quicker, and the long-term effect will be little or no
increase in milk.
Summer heat can cause a
10 to 20 percent drop in milk production. This loss in milk
production is directly related to a decrease in intake and lower
nutrient supply for milk production. This is especially harmful to
the high producer because her body's nutrient stores are limited.
You can do several things to keep intake up. One approach is to
increase the nutrient density of the ration so the cow does not have
to eat as much to meet her needs. Do this by increasing the crude
protein and energy content (Table 4). This method is difficult
because we must leave a minimal amount of fiber in the ration to
maintain fat production. Another approach is to provide shade, water
misters and fans around the feed area to encourage cows to eat and
stay at the feed area. Frequent feedings, especially during the
cooler time periods, and increased mineral feeding of electrolytes
(NA, K and MG) have been shown to help maintain intake and milk
production, also. The best approach to heat stress management is to
use all of these approaches. Each approach can contribute to
maintaining dry matter intake and milk production; however, the
single most important item may be a ready and plentiful supply of
clean, fresh, cool water.
Managing the high
producing dairy cow requires that we make everything work all of the
time. By observing the cows that produced over 40,000 pounds, we
have our guidelines for managing the high producing herd. The key to
getting our herd to producing a high level of milk will be obtaining
the highest level of management.
Bath, D.L., F.N.
Dickinson, H.A. Tucker and R.D. Appleman. 1985. "Dairy Cattle:
Principles, Practices, Problems, Profits." 3rd Edition. Lea &
Febger.
Guthrie, L.D. 1979.
"Balancing Rations for Dairy Cattle." Bulletin 814, UGA COOPERATIVE
EXTENSION SERVICE.
Guthrie, L.D. 1980.
"Feeding the Dairy Herd." Bulletin 816, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
SERVICE.
Guthrie, L.D. 1981.
"Silage for Dairy Cattle." Bulletin 616, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
SERVICE.
Johnson, J.T. 1984.
"Alfalfa Production in Georgia." Bulletin 898, UGA COOPERATIVE
EXTENSION SERVICE.
Maddux, J.N. and W.G.
Gilson. 1982. "Optimum Reproductive Efficiency in Dairy Herds."
Bulletin 734, UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Smith, James W. 1986.
"Dairy Herd Improvement Records, Their Need and Use." Bulletin 897,
UGA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE.
Wilcox,C.J.,
H.H.VanHorn, B.Harris,Jr., H.H. Head, S.P. Marshall, W.W. Thatcher,
D.W. Webb, and J.M. Wing. 1978. "Large Dairy Herd Management."
University of Florida Book.
Table 1. Summary
of First 40,000+ Pound Milk Producers -- 365
Days |
Name |
Year |
Times
Milked |
Milk
LB |
Test% |
Fat
LB |
BodyWt. |
Milk:Body
Wt. Ratio |
Carnation Ormsby Madcap Fayne |
1942 |
4x |
41943 |
3.3 |
1392 |
1800 |
23:1 |
Green Meadow Lily Pabst |
1951 |
3x |
42805 |
2.9 |
1246 |
1400 |
30:1 |
Mowry Leader Sis |
1967 |
2x |
40174 |
3.8 |
1522 |
1930 |
21:1 |
Reinharts Arthur - Farms Balled |
1970 |
2x |
40981 |
3.2 |
1297 |
- |
- |
Skagvale Graceful Hattie |
1971 |
2x |
44019 |
3.4 |
1505 |
1700 |
26:1 |
Breezewood Patsy Bar Pontiac |
1974 |
2x |
45280 |
4.8 |
2194 |
1860 |
24:1 |
Mowry Prince Corinne |
1974 |
2x |
50759 |
3.0 |
1548 |
1700 |
30:1 |
Beecher Arlinda Ellen |
1975 |
2x |
55661 |
2.8 |
1572 |
1750 |
32:1 |
Beecher Arlinda Ellen |
1977 |
2x |
48840 |
3.3 |
1624 |
1750 |
28:1 |
Reference: Cook, T.L. and J.L. Albright. 1976.
Holstein-Fresian World 73:1881-1883. Since 1977, more
than 37 cows have made records over 40,000 pounds of milk,
according to Holstein-Fresian Association
records. |
Table 2.
Requirements for Different Levels of Milk
Production |
|
Pounds of
Milk/Day |
Item |
Unit |
20 |
30 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
70 |
80 |
Dry Matter Intake |
lb. |
33.9 |
35.6 |
38.8 |
41.3 |
44.3 |
47.6 |
50.9 |
|
% |
2.51 |
2.64 |
2.87 |
3.06 |
3.28 |
3.53 |
3.77 |
Crude Protein |
lb. |
3.54 |
4.42 |
5.30 |
6.17 |
7.06 |
8.03 |
9.02 |
|
% |
10.5 |
12.2 |
13.6 |
14.9 |
15.9 |
16.9 |
17.7 |
Net Energy |
Mcal. |
18.6 |
22.3 |
26.0 |
29.7 |
33.5 |
37.7 |
41.9 |
|
% |
55. |
62. |
67. |
72. |
76. |
79. |
82. |
Crude Fiber |
lb. |
5.4 |
5.8 |
6.2 |
6.6 |
7.1 |
6.6 |
7.1 |
|
% |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
Calcium |
lb. |
.14 |
.18 |
.22 |
.26 |
.29 |
.34 |
.38 |
|
% |
.43 |
.5 |
.57 |
.63 |
.67 |
.71 |
.75 |
Phosphorus |
lb. |
.11 |
.14 |
.16 |
.19 |
.22 |
.25 |
.28 |
|
% |
.32 |
.38 |
.42 |
.47 |
.5 |
.53 |
.56 |
Body weight = 1350
pounds, 3.8% fat, 1.20 lead factor. |
Reference: Ely,
Lane. 1985. Requirements in the DART Program for Milk
Production. Handout. |
Table 3.
Rations for 80 Pounds of Milk |
|
Ration |
Ingredient |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Pounds per Cow
per Day |
Corn Silage |
81.0 |
65.0 |
|
Alfalfa Hay |
-- |
20.1 |
25.2 |
Corn |
18.8 |
20.1 |
2.0 |
Soybeanmeal 44 |
10.2 |
8.5 |
2.0 |
Dical Phos |
.15 |
-- |
-- |
Limestone |
.69 |
.69 |
.32 |
Phosphorus |
.41 |
.55 |
.65 |
Trace Mineral Salt |
.2 |
.2 |
.2 |
Dyna-mate |
-- |
-- |
.04 |
Reference: Ely,
Lane. 1984. DART Rations. |
Table 4.
Effect of Shade or Sun and High or Low Roughage Ration on Milk
Production and Dry Matter Intake |
|
Shade |
|
Sun |
High |
Low |
|
High |
Low |
Milk (lb/day) |
51.7 |
51.7 |
|
43.8 |
49.1 |
DM Intake (lb) |
39.9 |
39.4 |
|
35.6 |
37.1 |
Roughage:Grain, % |
69:31 |
41:59 |
|
67:33 |
37:63 |
Guthrie, et.al.,
J. Dairy Sci. 51:969. |
Circular
788/April, 1986
The University
of Georgia and Ft. Valley State College, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative
Extension Service offers educational programs, assistance and
materials to all people without regard to race, color, national
origin, age, sex or disability.
An Equal Opportunity Employer/Affirmative Action
Organization Committed to a Diverse Work Force
Issued in
furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 18 and June
30, 1914, The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and
Environmental Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture
cooperating.
Gale A. Buchanan, Dean and Director
|