INTERNATIONAL CLEANER PRODUCTION INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE

Case Study #277

1. Headline: Process modification in a automobile component

factory reduces toxicity risks for workers.

2. Background: The Paulstra firm manufactures elastic joints

in rubber and metal for automobile anti-vibratory

components. Production of 31 millions of pieces in 1992;

an estimated 6 tons of rubber and 9 tons of steel used per

day. Within the framework of its security and environment

plan, it replaced a chemical stripping of the tools by a

thermal one.

3. Cleaner Production Principle: Process modification.

4. Description of Cleaner Production Application:

Information about the process and wastes

The adhesive coating equipment must be strongly stripped

after each operation, with trichlorethylene. This

operation generates toxicity risks for the workmen and

accidental pollution risks during the handling of the

products.

The thermal stripping offers a cheaper and less harmful

solution.

A fluidized bed kiln, gas heating combined with an

afterburner for the fumes was set up. The tools for

stripping heated about 450C in a tub with an horizontal

porous base plate which supports sand and which the

fluidization air flow go through. There is no overheating

risk, therefore no buckling nor oxidation risk. Stripping

results from the thermal decomposition of the organic

constituents. Shaking and brushing make it easier to take

down the last residual particles. The gaseous discharges

are according to the environmental norms. The kiln

generates small quantities of fly ash which must be stored

in a special dump.

Material / energy balance and substitution

BEFORE

AFTER

Trichlorethylene consumption 42 tons/year 0

Energy (natural gas) 200 000 kwh/year

5. Economics:

Cost of direct investment

Fluidized bed kiln 375

000

Handling device 33

000

Gas feed device and smoke treatments 33 000

Tests and others 34

000

Total

481 000 FF (1993)

Operation and maintenance costs

Estimated operation costs 80 000/year

Saving on trichlorethylene 150 000/year FF (1993)

Period of amortization: About 6.5 years.

6. Advantages: No more need for solvents. No more risk of

accidental pollution. Improvement of the working

conditions.

7. Constraints: No information provided.

8. Contact:

Agence de l'Eau Loire-Bretagne

M. SENELIER

TEL: 33 38.51.73.73

M. MARTIN

Responsible for ordnance

TEL: 33 48.71.14.51

Fluidized bed kiln from the IPROS firm

Z.I. Les BÆthunes

95310 SAINT OUEN L'AUMONE

TEL: 33 34.64.75.00

Paulstra

62, rue Henri Barbusse

B.P. 239

18101 VIERZON - France

TEL: 33 48.71.14.51

FAX: 33 48.71.73.27

M. Maton

M. Chatenet

Office International de l'Eau

Direction de la Formation et des Etudes

rue Edouard Chamberland

87065 Limoges Cedex, France

TEL: 33 55114770

FAX: 33 55777115

9. Keywords: France, automobile, automobile part, process

modification, rubber, iron and steel, stripping,

trichloroethylene, fluidized bed, solvent, ISIC 3843

10. This case study was submitted to UNEP IE in 1994 by the

French Office International de l'Eau. It has not undergone

a formal technical review.