Case Study #277
1. Headline: Process modification in a automobile component
factory reduces toxicity risks for workers.
2. Background: The Paulstra firm manufactures elastic joints
in rubber and metal for automobile anti-vibratory
components. Production of 31 millions of pieces in 1992;
an estimated 6 tons of rubber and 9 tons of steel used per
day. Within the framework of its security and environment
plan, it replaced a chemical stripping of the tools by a
thermal one.
3. Cleaner Production Principle: Process modification.
4. Description of Cleaner Production Application:
Information about the process and wastes
The adhesive coating equipment must be strongly stripped
after each operation, with trichlorethylene. This
operation generates toxicity risks for the workmen and
accidental pollution risks during the handling of the
products.
The thermal stripping offers a cheaper and less harmful
solution.
A fluidized bed kiln, gas heating combined with an
afterburner for the fumes was set up. The tools for
stripping heated about 450C in a tub with an horizontal
porous base plate which supports sand and which the
fluidization air flow go through. There is no overheating
risk, therefore no buckling nor oxidation risk. Stripping
results from the thermal decomposition of the organic
constituents. Shaking and brushing make it easier to take
down the last residual particles. The gaseous discharges
are according to the environmental norms. The kiln
generates small quantities of fly ash which must be stored
in a special dump.
Material / energy balance and substitution
BEFORE
AFTER
Trichlorethylene consumption 42 tons/year 0
Energy (natural gas) 200 000 kwh/year
5. Economics:
Cost of direct investment
Fluidized bed kiln 375
000
Handling device 33
000
Gas feed device and smoke treatments 33 000
Tests and others 34
000
Total
481 000 FF (1993)
Operation and maintenance costs
Estimated operation costs 80 000/year
Saving on trichlorethylene 150 000/year FF (1993)
Period of amortization: About 6.5 years.
6. Advantages: No more need for solvents. No more risk of
accidental pollution. Improvement of the working
conditions.
7. Constraints: No information provided.
8. Contact:
Agence de l'Eau Loire-Bretagne
M. SENELIER
TEL: 33 38.51.73.73
M. MARTIN
Responsible for ordnance
TEL: 33 48.71.14.51
Fluidized bed kiln from the IPROS firm
Z.I. Les BÆthunes
95310 SAINT OUEN L'AUMONE
TEL: 33 34.64.75.00
Paulstra
62, rue Henri Barbusse
B.P. 239
18101 VIERZON - France
TEL: 33 48.71.14.51
FAX: 33 48.71.73.27
M. Maton
M. Chatenet
Office International de l'Eau
Direction de la Formation et des Etudes
rue Edouard Chamberland
87065 Limoges Cedex, France
TEL: 33 55114770
FAX: 33 55777115
9. Keywords: France, automobile, automobile part, process
modification, rubber, iron and steel, stripping,
trichloroethylene, fluidized bed, solvent, ISIC 3843
10. This case study was submitted to UNEP IE in 1994 by the
French Office International de l'Eau. It has not undergone
a formal technical review.