INTERNATIONAL CLEANER PRODUCTION INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE

CASE STUDY #233

1. Headline: The breakdown of the size of polymers can be

carried out using oxidizing agents such as ammonium

persulphate and hydrogen peroxide at high pH and high

temperature. Using the enzyme amylase less aggressive

chemicals are required and less fibre damage is obtained.

2. Background: See below.

3. Cleaner Production Principle: material substitution,

chemicals are substituted by enzymes.

4. Description of Cleaner Production Application:

Process and Waste Information

Introduction

During the weaving process the warp (chain) threads are

exposed to considerable mechanical strain. In order to

prevent breaking, they are usually reinforced by coating

(sizing) with a gelatinous substance (size).

In the weaving of cotton blend fabrics, the size material

most often contains starch in native or modified form,

sometimes in combination with other polymers such as

polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyacrylic acid (PAA) or

carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). A small amount of fats or

oils may be added to the size also, with the aim of

lubricating the warp coat surface.

As a consequence of the sizing, the warp threads of the

fabric are not able to absorb water or finishing agents

to a sufficient degree. This means that first the size

must be removed (desizing) before finishing. Some types

may be removed in a simple scouring process (water soluble

sizes). But in most cases chemical breakdown of the size

polymer in a separate desizing treatment is necessary in

order to obtain the desired quality of the final fabric

[2].

TABLE 1: Biodegradability of size raw materials

BOD(5) g/g COD(tot.) g/g

BOD/CODx100%

starch, natural 0.65 1.18

55

starch, oxidized 0.60 0.99 61

PVA 0.01 1.79

0.55

The conventional process

The breakdown of the size polymer is carried out using oxidi

zing agents such as ammonium persulphate or hydrogen peroxide

at high pH and temperature.

oxidizing agents ---> desizing ---> size,

d

esizing agents,

wet

polluted cotton.

The treatment reduces the tensile strength of the fabric and

results in poor removal of some PVA-containing sizes.

The quantity of size is about 15 % of the yarn weight [4].

TABLE 2: In- and output desizing

Input desizing per kilo cotton Output per kilo cotton

25-50 g H2O2 70 g size

5-150 g NaOH tensides

10-15 g tensides oxidizing agents

54 litres water 54 litres polluted water

wet polluted cotton

The COD value can be from 3500 mg O2 /l to 23000 mg O2 /l [1].

Enzymatic desizing

Complete removal of starch-containing size without fibre damage

is best obtained by using enzymatic desizing agents. Formerly

amylase derived from mould, pancreas or malt where used in

desizing. Today liquid bacterial amylase preparations dominate.

The desizing process can be divided into three stages:

Impregnation: Enzyme solution is absorbed by the fabric.

Incubation: The size is broken down by the enzyme.

After-wash: The breakdown products from the size are removed

from the fabric.

Impregnation

- Thorough wetting of fabric with enzyme solution.

Temperature 70C or higher. Liquid pick up of 1 litre per

kg fabric.

- Sufficient enzyme stability (temp, pH, calcium ion level).

- Gelatinization of the size (starch) to the highest

possible extent.

Incubation.

- Long incubation time allows a low enzyme concentration.

After-wash.

- The desizing process is not finished until the size

breakdown products have been removed from the fabric. This

is best obtained by a subsequent detergent wash (with

NaOH) at the highest possible temperature.

There are four procedures for desizing:

Jigger or winch

pad-roll (or pitt)

J-box (continuous)

Pad-stream (continuous)

TABLE 3: Process conditions

jigger/winch pad roll j-box pad-steam

aquazym aquazym aquazym aquazym

impregnation:

dosage, (g/100 l) 50-250 100-300

30-200 75-350

temp, C 65 70 80 80

water hardness

ppm Ca/dH >60/8 >60/8 >6/1 >6/1

pH 6.0-7.0 6.0-7.0 6.5-7.5 5.5-7.5

wetting agent

g/100 l 50 50 50 50

incubation:

incubation time -- 2-4 h 10-20 min. 15-

120 sec

temp,øC 15-20 -- 85 100

after-wash:

temp, øC 90-95 90-95 95-100 95-100

NaOH kg/ 100 l 0.5-1 0.5-1 1-3 1-3

There are three enzymes Aquazym 120l, Aquazym Ultra 250l and

Termamyl 60l. In this table only data on the aquazym and the

aquazym-ultra are presented.

Scale of operation

Not available.

Stage of development

The process is fully implemented. In the Netherlands a big

finishing company KTV is using the enzyme for more than 20

years.

Level of commercialization

The enzyme is commercial available at Novo Nordisk.

Material/Energy Balances and Substitutions

Less oxidizing agent must be used and there is less oxidizing

agent waste.

5. Economics

Investment Costs

Not available

Operational and Maintenance Costs

Not available

Payback Time

Not available

6. Advantages

- Avoidance of chemical fibre damage

- Superior biodegradability of effluent

- Less handling of aggressive chemicals

7. Constraints

The use of the enzyme depends on the kind of size. If there are

chemicals used in the size to which the enzyme is not resistant

then it is impossible to use the enzyme.

8. Contacts and Citations

Type of Source Material

Articles, interviews.

Citation

1. SPIN document, textielveredeling, march 1993.

2. Novo Nordisk enzymes for the textile industry, desizing,

dec.1991

3. Dorthe Marcher et al.,paper presented at the seminar on

Sizing, Italy, march 1993.

4. A. Klingenberg, Textielchemicalien, Stichting Natuur en

Milieu, Utrecht, 1986.

Level of detail of the Source Material

A bit more detail is available.

Industry/Program Contact and Address

Not available. No permission is asked to or given by the

contact.

Abstractor Name and Address

Annelies den Braber

TME, Institute for Applied Environmental Economics

Grote Marktstraat 24

2511 BJ The Hague

Netherlands

tel: +3170-3464422

fax: +3170-3623469

9. Keywords: ISIC I2242, wastewater, desizing, textile

finishing, enzyme, amylase, Novo Nordisk, biotechnology,

the Netherlands, textile, material substitution, polymers,

cotton, BOD, COD.

10. Reviewer's Comments: This case study was submitted to

UNEP IE by the Institute for Applied Environmental

Economics (TME) of the Netherlands on the part of the UNEP

IE working group on Biotechnology. The case study was

edited for the ICPIC diskette in August 1995. It has not

undergone a formal technical review.