CASE STUDY # 213
1. Headline: A petrochemical company saves more than
2.000.000 NKR a year from implementing cleaner production
measures
2. Background: See Description of Cleaner Production
Application
3. Cleaner Production Principle: Good housekeeping, product
modification, process modification
4. Description of Cleaner Production Application: This case
study was carried out in March 1992. A variety of options were
adopted:
--Good Housekeeping--In the original process plastic powder
left over from the production process was washed away with
water which led to a basin. Another waste stream containing oil
was led to the same basin. Because the waste streams were
mixed, none of the wastes could be re-used or recycled. Change
of operation routines eliminated the oil contents and the
plastic powder was sold to a recycling company.
--Product Change-- The company uses cardboard containers and
plastic bags as packaging for their products. Current packaging
requires a non-standard pall etc. by changing the size of the
package, standard EUR-pallets can be used.
--Raw material substitution-- The company uses a large amount
of oil in their compressors. By changing the specification of
the oil, the oil can be used for a longer period of time and
oil consumption decreases.
Statoil Bamble produces polypropen (PP), polyeten with low
density (PEL) and polyeten with high density (PEH). Total
yearly production is 300.000 ton. The company has 640
employees. The following main points have been evaluated during
the project:
- When the production process is in a closing down phase,
propane gas is led to a torch. Instead of being led to the
torch, this gas can be pumped into a tank and then be used as
raw material in the production process.
- Some of the pellets from the production is of a quality too
low to be sold. These pellets can be transferred to a powder
silo and then extruded once more.
- The company uses 23 million tons of water each year for
cooling. The water is paid for, runs through the factory and is
then discharged into the fjord. Re-use of water is possible by
changes in the cooling system and investment in a cooling tower
and cooling system.
- Re-use of a large amount of the waste the company generates
each year is possible.
5. Economics: The only measure that requires substantial
investments is to lead the gas away from the torch, but the
figures have not been calculated. Regarding waste streams,
yearly changes in costs include the following: elimination of
oil in production, 250.000 nkr; elimination of non-standard
pallets, 400.000 nkr; re-use of pellets, 700.000 nkr; net
profit from sales due to re-use of used pallets, 400.000 nkr;
re-cycling of plastic bags, 120.000 nkr; re-use of extruded
plastic, 50.000 nkr; re-cycling of paper/cardboard, 315.000
nkr; and re-cycling of plastic containers, 100.000 nkr.
6. Advantages: Main benefits from implementing the cleaner
production techniques were economical as outlined above, with
net savings close to 2 million nkr.
7. Constraints: Most measures were taken are in accordance with
"good housekeeping" principles, and no particular technical
constraints were reported.
8. Contacts:
The following documents were cited:
Amundsen, A (1993) Miljoteknologi og renere produksjon.
Universitesforlaget, Oslo ISBN 82-00-41009-9
Amundsen, A et.al. (1992) Renere produksjon, Bransjemetode,
Petrokjemi, Polyolefinproduksjon. Oestfold Research Foundation
report no . OR 02-92 ISBN 82-7520-078-4, Scandpower report
no.24.21.0l/A.
Company contact:
Statoil Bamble
Att: Grant Gundersen
3960 Stathelle
Norway
TEL: +47 35 57 70 00
Norwegian State Pollution Authority
Att: Uno Abrahamsen Postboks
8100 Dep. 0032 Oslo, Norway
TEL: +47 22 57 34 00
Oestfold Research Foundation
Att: Audun Amundsen
Boks 276
N-1601 Fredrikstad
TEL: + 47 69 34 00
Scandpower A/S
Att: Helge Brakestad
Boks 3
N-2007 Kjeller
TEL: + 47 63 81 49 20
9. Keywords: ISIC Code SIC 3513, polyolefin production process,
10. Reviewer's Comment's: This case study was translated from
Norwegian and submitted to UNEP IE on behalf of the Norwegian
State Pollution Control Authority by Stiftelsen
Ostfoldforskning in February 1994. They were reviewed and
edited by UNEP IE in July 1995. They have not undergone a
formal quality review.