INTERNATIONAL CLEANER PRODUCTION INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE

CASE STUDY # 184

1. Headline: Reduction in the Oil Consumption in the

Synthetic Fiber Industry

2. Background: See below.

3. Cleaner Production Principle: Process modification

4. Description of Cleaner Production Application: This

technology involves equipment modification to reduce oil

consumption and hot air temperature.

Case Study Summary

Process and Waste Information: In the finishing steps of

manufacture of dissolving grade pulp, at Harihar

Polyfiber, the pulp is dewatered, flash dried, baled and

packed. The mechanical dewatering was done to about 38%

of dry content then the pulp was dried further to 70% of

dry content using hot air at 300 Degrees C, generated by

burning fuel oil.

In order to reduce the oil consumption and temperature of

the hot air, two dewatering booster presses were installed

in series after the existing dewatering presses running in

parallel. This improved the dryness of pulp to +50% and

the temperature of the hot air could be brought down to

200 Degrees C.

State of Development: The clean technology is fully

implemented.

Level of Commercialization: The clean technology is fully

commercialized.

Balances and Substitutions: Improvement in dryness

content of pulp by 50% and temperature of hot air is

reduced from 300 Degrees C to 200 Degrees C.

6. Advantages: Economic benefits were a savings of Rs. 3.5

million/year by reducing fuel oil consumption by about 14

kg/tonne of pulp. Furthermore, an improvement in pulp

quality resulted by avoiding the "burnouts" due to higher

temperatures of hot air. Environmental benefits include

reduction in fuel oil consumption.

7. Constraints: No information provided.

8. Contacts and Citation

Types of Source Material: Unpublished.

Citation and Industry/Program Contact and Address: Mr.

Shailendra Jain, Senior Executive President, Harihar

Polyfibers (GRASIM), Karnataka, India.

9. Keywords: India, textile, synthetic fiber, process

modification, ISIC 2299, oil, energy saving.

10. Reviewer's Comments: This case study was originally

compiled by the UNEP Working Group of Textiles. It

underwent a UNEP IE funded technical review in 1994 for

quality and completeness. It was edited for the ICPIC

diskette in July of 1995.

( Docno UNEP 11: DOCUMENT NOT AVAILABLE 11-27 )