INTERNATIONAL CLEANER PRODUCTION INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE

CASE STUDY # 159

1. Headline: Replacement of Hexavalent Chromium with

Trivalent Chromium in Decorative Chrome Plating Reduces

Sludge Generation

2. Background: See below.

3. Cleaner Production Application: Material substitution

4. Description of Cleaner Production Application: Cleaner

production is achieved by plating with trivalent rather

than hexavalent chromium. The tendency of trivalent

chromium to be oxidized to hexavalent chromium was

overcome by using a special membrane surrounding the

anodes. This also allows use of anodes made of lead. The

low deposition rates associated with trivalent chrome

plating were grossly increased by using specially

developed in-house organic additives to modify the

reactions and give performances superior to the

traditional process. This results in production which is

20-40% higher.

Case Study Summary

Process and Waste Information: Although the composition

of the plating line was not clear from the source

document, it is assumed that the sequence consists of

bright nickel plating with drag-out recovery, two clean

running rinses, chrome plate, two additional rinses, and a

final hot rinse. In the traditional process, hexavalent

concentrations are sometimes as high as 120 g/l.

Trivalent chromium replaces hexavalent chromium in the new

process and organic compounds are added. This results in

a decrease in sludge generation of over 95%, energy

consumption reduced by over 50%, lower current densities,

no chloride in the electrolyte, and a 98% reduction in

waste treatment costs. No reduction chemicals are needed

with the new process. Product quality was greatly

improved due to better coverage and more uniform plating.

Stage of Development: The technology has been fully

implemented and in operation since about 1985.

Level of Commercialization: It appears the company has

developed the procedure and sells it under the name

"Envirochrome-90". The membranes were developed for

mercury-free electrolysis of sodium chloride. Canning is

a supplier of machineries to the electroplating industry.

Material/Energy Balances and Substitutions:

Material Category Quantity Before* Quantity

After*

Waste generation: 100%

95%

Feedstock use: N/A

N/A

Water use: N/A

N/A

Energy use:

Consumption 100%

50%

Current densities 10-15Amp/dm2

3.2-8Amp/dm2 8-12V

*Exact quantities were not supplied.

5. Economics*

Investment Costs: Actual figures on investments are not

given, and these estimates may be low. A comparison is

made on the investment costs for a traditional plating

line and the new plating process for a plant producing 3

million nickel and chrome plated water fittings per year.

Traditional Technology

New Technology

Plating plant 175,000

135,000

Effluent plant 70,000

52,000

Operational & Maintenance: Only costs for water treatment

were given for the traditional and new technologies as

follows:

Traditional Technology

New Technology

Chrome reduction 6,459

0

Hydroxide precip. 1,605

120

Sludge disposal 2,905

130

Labor and materials 2,050

50

Total 13,064

300

*No costs were given for labor, maintenance of membranes,

or energy consumption for other operations. Membrane life

is assumed to be indefinite since no signs of wear

occurred after five years of operation.

Payback Time: It is not possible to calculate a payback

time due to lack of data but appears the technology is

relatively cheap compared to the traditional technology.

6. Advantages

Sludge production decreased by 95%, waste treatment costs

decreased by 98%, and power consumption decreased by over

50%. Electrical current densities are lower and the

electrolyte is less corrosive since no chloride is

present. The technology appears to be cheaper than the

traditional process and results in improved product

quality.

Benefits from improved public relations, reduced

liabilities, and changes in regulatory compliance were not

discussed.

7. Constraints: The brownish color of trivalent chrome may

be a problem for some people.

8. Contact: Contacts and Citation

Type of Source Material:

Document 1: UNEP report

Document 2: British government leaflet

Document 3: Plant leaflet

Citation:Document 1: Title not given.

B. Johnson, W. Canning Materials Ltd.

P.O.Box 288, Great Hampton Street

Birmingham B18 6AS, UK.

TEL 44-21-236-8621

FAX 44-21-236-0444

Document 2: Clean Technology.

EPT Office, Department of the Environment

Room B 357, Romney House

43 Marsham Street

London SW1P 3PY, UK

TEL: 4421-276-8318

Document 3: Envirochrome Process Operating Guide

W. Canning Materials Ltd.

P.O. Box 288

Great Hampton Street

Birmingham B18 6AS, UK

TEL: 44 21-236-8621

FAX: 44 21-236-0444.

9. Keywords: United Kingdom, UK, electroplating, material

substitution, ISIC 3471, chrome, trivalent chromium,

hexavalent chromium, rinsing, sludge, plating,

electrolysis.

10. Reviewer's Comments: This case study was originally

compiled by the UNEP IE Working Group on Metal Finishing.

It underwent a UNEP IE funded technical review in 1994 for

quality and completeness. It was edited for the ICPIC

diskette in July 1995.

(DOCNO: 10-01)