INTERNATIONAL CLEANER PRODUCTION INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE

CASE STUDY # 157

1. Headline: On-site recycle and reuse of alcohol wash

solution

2. Background: See below.

3. Cleaner Production Principle: internal recycling

4. Description of Cleaner Production Application: This plant

generated 6,000 gal/yr of reactor wash solution containing

approximately 50% alcohol, phenol formaldehyde resin, and

water. Economic considerations prompted the plant to

recycle on site by distilling and reusing the alcohol.

The distillation kettle was already available on site.

Steam was available at negligible costs. The resin

removed from the reactor can also be reused. Laboratory

analysis of synthetic resins also generates waste which is

disposed off-site. Segregation of these wastes was

attempted, but it was impractical due to the small

quantities generated, i.e. 2-3 drums/month. Proper

disposal is the only option available for managing these

wastes.

Case Study Summary

Original Manufacturing Process and Previous Waste/Emission

Management Methods: Phenol formaldehyde is manufactured

in batch reactors. The reactors are cleaned with alcohol

every time a change is made in product specifications.

Scale of Operation: This facility has 50 employees, and

annual revenues of 5-10 million dollars.

Stage of Development: Fully implemented

Level of Commercialization: Alcohol recovery systems are

readily available

Results of Application: Better than 67% reduction of

waste generated and disposed off-site.

Wastes generated - 6,000 gal/yr (before), less than 2,000

gal/yr (after)

Waste and/or Emission Description

Physical state: Slurry

Composition: Alcohol, resin,

water

Description: Reactor wash

solution

5. Economics

Other costs: $140/drum of waste

to treat off site. Alcohol costs

$1.60/gal.

Economic Benefits: $15,000 annual

savings in material and treatment

costs

6. Advantages:

Liability: Liabilities by reducing the quantity of

hazardous waste generated

Regulatory compliance: Regulatory compliance is easier

with reduced volumes of F003 wastes disposed off-site.

7. Constraints: No information provided.

8. Contacts and Citation

Industry/Program Contact and Address: Richard J. Gimello,

Susan B. Boyle, New Jersey Hazardous Waste Facilities

Siting Commission, 28 West State Street, Trenton, N.J.

08608, United States

Citation: Environmental Resources Management, Inc. A

Study of Hazardous Waste Reduction and Recycling in Four

Industrial Groups in New Jersey. April 1987

9. Keywords: United States, USA, chemical, recycling, SIC

2821, reactor, alcohol, distillation, resin.

10. Reviewer's Comments: This case study was originally

abstracted for the US EPA's Pollution Prevention

Information Clearinghouse from a document compiled by the

USA New Jersey Hazardous Waste Facilities Siting

Commission. It underwent a UNEP IE funded technical

review in 1994 for quality and completeness. It was

edited for the ICPIC diskette in July 1995.

( Docno UNEP07: 031-001-A-435 )