INTERNATIONAL CLEANER PRODUCTION INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE

CASE STUDY # 140

1. Headline: Process modifications in a machine shop results

in savings.

2. Background: See below

3. Cleaner Production Principle: process modification

4. Description of Cleaner Production Application: A six tank

metal surface preparation (phosphating) and cleaning

process, a filtration system and a residuals concentration

process replaces a manual process, using acetone, for

removing surface oils from metal parts. The wiped parts

had been subsequently cleaned in three rinse tanks. The

new process uses counterflow to efficiently utilize the

rinse waters. The residuals are concentrated by liquid

evaporation and sludge concentration, using steam heat

from the boiler in the winter and a new gas boiler in the

summer. A distillation unit permits additional savings

through acetone and other solvent recovery and reuse.

Material/Energy Balance and Substitutions

FEEDSTOCKS: Water, acetone, chemicals

WASTES: Wastewaters, acetone

MEDIUM: Liquid

5. Economics

CAPITAL COST:

$38,967.68

OPERATION/MAINTENANCE: $500/yr

gas per boiler

MONTHS TO RECOVER: Not

reported

DISPOSAL & FEEDSTOCK:

$14,418/yr

6. Advantages

FEEDSTOCK REDUCTION: 45% reduction in acetone, 96% in

water, and 50% in chemicals

WASTE PRODUCTION: Reduced to less than 500 lbs/yr

IMPACT: The new metal fabrication system addresses

previous operational problems, reduces material costs, oil

accumulation, labor requirements, and residual waste

disposal costs. Hazardous sludge generation is reduced to

less than one 55 gallon drum.

7. Constraints: No information provided.

8. Contact and Citation: "Case Summaries of Waste Reduction

by Industries in the Southeast", Schecter, Roger N., Hunt,

Gary, July, 1989, Page 40.

9. Keywords: United States, USA, metal, machine shop,

process modification, cleaning, surface preparation,

filtration, rinsing, distillation, solvent, acetone, ISIC

3499.

10. Reviewer's Comments: This case study part of a core

collection of case studies from North Carolina, USA and

was originally abstracted for the US Environmental

Protection Agency's Pollution Prevention Information

Clearinghouse. It underwent a UNEP IE funded technical

review in 1994 for quality and completeness. It was

edited for the ICPIC diskette in July 1995.

( Docno unep04: DOCUMENT NOT AVAILABLE (291))