INTERNATIONAL CLEANER PRODUCTION INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE

Case Study # 129

1. Headline: Aluminum is used instead of cadmium in the

conventional electroplating technology for the elimination

of Cd and CN containing waters and hydroxide sludge, while

reducing operating costs.

2. Background: See below.

3. Cleaner Production Principle: Material substitution

4. Description for Cleaner Production Application:

Conventional electroplating technology using aluminum

instead of cadmium as the plating metal. A thin layer of

nickel is initially deposited on ferrous and aluminum die

casting materials. The pieces are dried using

fluorohydrocarbons, and passed to the aluminum plating

cell. Using an electrolyte solution, an aluminum layer is

applied to the nickel coating. A post-treatment process

may be applied to improve corrosion protection or for

decorative appearance.

Material/Energy Balance and Substitution

FEEDSTOCKS: Nickel - 18 g/m2, Al - 27 g/m2, electrolytic

bath (recycled), electrical energy

WASTES: No wastewaters (electrolyte is recycled),

evaporation of toluene from the bath (1-2 kg/hr)

MEDIUM: Vapor

5. Economics

CAPITAL COST: 6 million Dfl - 40 m2/h plant

OPERATION/MAINTENANCE: 50 - 75 Dfl/m2

DISPOSAL & FEEDSTOCK: 10 - 15 Dfl/m2 reduction in

operating costs, elimination of wastewater treatment and

disposal costs

6. Advantages

FEEDSTOCK REDUCTION: 18 g of Ni, and 27 g Al is require

compared to 180 g Cd, and 5 g CN in conventional

technology

WASTE PRODUCTION: Cd and CN containing wastewaters are

eliminated. 1-2 kg/h toluene vapor is produced.

IMPACT: Elimination of Cd and CN containing waters and

hydroxide sludge, with reduced operating costs. Discharge

of the bath contents occurs after two years, and the

materials are recycled.

7. Constraints: No information provided.

8. Contact and Citation: Compendium on Low and Non-waste

Technology, United Nations Economic and Social Counsel,

Monograph "A Low-waste Electroplating Process of Aluminum

in Non-aqueous Solvent (Sigal-Process)" ENV/WP.2/5/Add.125

9. KEYWORDS: the Netherlands, metal, electroplating,

material substitution, cadmium, aluminum, nickel, toluene,

ISIC 3813.

10. Reviewers Comments: This case study was originally

abstracted for the US EPA Pollution Prevention Information

Clearinghouse. It underwent a UNEP IE funded technical

review in 1994 for quality and completeness. It was edited

for the ICPIC diskette in July 1995.

( DOCNO: 400-125-A-332 )