Case Study # 129
1. Headline: Aluminum is used instead of cadmium in the
conventional electroplating technology for the elimination
of Cd and CN containing waters and hydroxide sludge, while
reducing operating costs.
2. Background: See below.
3. Cleaner Production Principle: Material substitution
4. Description for Cleaner Production Application:
Conventional electroplating technology using aluminum
instead of cadmium as the plating metal. A thin layer of
nickel is initially deposited on ferrous and aluminum die
casting materials. The pieces are dried using
fluorohydrocarbons, and passed to the aluminum plating
cell. Using an electrolyte solution, an aluminum layer is
applied to the nickel coating. A post-treatment process
may be applied to improve corrosion protection or for
decorative appearance.
Material/Energy Balance and Substitution
FEEDSTOCKS: Nickel - 18 g/m2, Al - 27 g/m2, electrolytic
bath (recycled), electrical energy
WASTES: No wastewaters (electrolyte is recycled),
evaporation of toluene from the bath (1-2 kg/hr)
MEDIUM: Vapor
5. Economics
CAPITAL COST: 6 million Dfl - 40 m2/h plant
OPERATION/MAINTENANCE: 50 - 75 Dfl/m2
DISPOSAL & FEEDSTOCK: 10 - 15 Dfl/m2 reduction in
operating costs, elimination of wastewater treatment and
disposal costs
6. Advantages
FEEDSTOCK REDUCTION: 18 g of Ni, and 27 g Al is require
compared to 180 g Cd, and 5 g CN in conventional
technology
WASTE PRODUCTION: Cd and CN containing wastewaters are
eliminated. 1-2 kg/h toluene vapor is produced.
IMPACT: Elimination of Cd and CN containing waters and
hydroxide sludge, with reduced operating costs. Discharge
of the bath contents occurs after two years, and the
materials are recycled.
7. Constraints: No information provided.
8. Contact and Citation: Compendium on Low and Non-waste
Technology, United Nations Economic and Social Counsel,
Monograph "A Low-waste Electroplating Process of Aluminum
in Non-aqueous Solvent (Sigal-Process)" ENV/WP.2/5/Add.125
9. KEYWORDS: the Netherlands, metal, electroplating,
material substitution, cadmium, aluminum, nickel, toluene,
ISIC 3813.
10. Reviewers Comments: This case study was originally
abstracted for the US EPA Pollution Prevention Information
Clearinghouse. It underwent a UNEP IE funded technical
review in 1994 for quality and completeness. It was edited
for the ICPIC diskette in July 1995.
( DOCNO: 400-125-A-332 )