Reduction in the use of solvents in a paint and lacquer production company Norway 1993 Full scale

MANUFACTURE OF CHEMICALS AND CHEMICAL PRODUCTS # 33

Background

Scandia Kjemiske A/S was invited by their parent company to take part in a cleaner production project. This project was initiated by the State Pollution Authority and Norwegian Society for Chartered Engineers. At the same time the State Pollution Authority was planning to license the releases to solvents. The company knew it had high costs in connection with its waste management, and wanted to reduce these to the lowest possible level. The case study was carried out in 1993.

Cleaner Production Principle

Housekeeping; Material substitution; Recovery, Reuse and Recycle

Cleaner Production Application

The main health and environmental problem in the company is release of solvents from production. The company has started a process with the aim to introduce water-based products. This process has so far reduced the release of solvents from 10 kg/hour to 4 kg/hour.

Good housekeeping practices have been promoted by information to the workers. Both the release of solvents and the generation of waste is influenced by daily practices.

Reuse of incoming packages is another measure that has been implemented, both to reduce costs and to reduce the amount of waste.

Covering of some containers has prevented the evaporation of solvents into air.

Case Study Summary

Scandia Kjemiske produces 2,2 mill. liters of pigmented and unpigmented lacquer each year. The main markets are industry, car repair shops, and "do it yourself" hobbyists.

During the production process, solvents are released into the air. This is the main environmental problem. Many of the measures taken during the project have the common goal of reducing the release of solvents. Below, different measures are listed.

Cleaning of mills. The cleaning of mills requires large amounts of thinner. In some applications, thinner can be reused. This reduces the amount of waste generated, and does not require investments.
Closing off the immediate area around the axles for dissolvers and stirring equipment. This reduces the releases to air.
The drying of boxes now takes place over open barrels. Experiments with covers will be initiated to see if it might be possible to let the runoff take place in a closed environment.
Reduction of the use of open strainers (closed filling system).
Raw materials have been evaluated and classified. Raw materials in category 1 will be phased-out in 1993, while category two will be phased-out during 1995.
Standardization of primary and secondary packaging components to reduce the number of different items, is considered.
Draining of 1/9 liter boxes directly from containers, has been started. This eliminates the temporary storage on 20 liter buckets.
Earlier routines for weighing thinner have been changed, something that has reduced the amount of waste.

Metal scrap is generated from packaging, raw materials and finished products

To reduce the amount of non-returnable pallets, discussions have started with suppliers. The use of Euro-pallets will make it possible with internal/external re-use.
Cleaning and selling of 120 liter plastic containers has started

Material/Energy Balances and Substitutions

Waste stream In the period of measure Yearly Yearly reduction
Paper/cardboard (impure) 643 kg 7780 kg N/A
Paper/cardboard (pure) 853 kg re-use now 100% 10322 kg former 60%
Barrels 2001 2484 kg

eliminated, rest reuse

30069 kg 8000 kg
Metal containers 420 kg 5084 kg unchanged
Metal boxes 487 kg

eliminated

5893 kg 400 kg
Plastic containers 24 kg 291 kg 250 kg reuse
Plastic (pure) 415 kg 5022 kg unchanged
Plastic (impure) 66 kg 793 kg unchanged
Pallets 3014 kg

eliminated the rest

reused internally

36485 kg 1100 kg
Water for washing 787 kg 9527 kg unchanged
Thinner for washing 3455 kg eliminated so far, but potential for a reduction of 28500 kg 60000 kg none
Rags 436 kg 5279 kg unchanged
Other 552 kg 6680 kg unchanged
Total 13636 kg eliminated or re-used internally/ externally 183225 kg 40000 kg

Environmental and Economic Benefits

There is a yearly net savings 165.000 NKR in operational and maintenance costs.

Constraints

None reported.

Contacts

Norwegian State Pollution Authority
Att: Uno Abrahamsen
Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 Oslo,
Norway
Tel : + 47 22 57 34 00
 
Oestfold Research Foundation
P.O.Box 276
N-1601 Fredrikstad
Tel : +47.69341900
 
A/S Skandia Kjemiske
Att: Knut A. Skj'r
Postboks 42 Alnabru
0614 Oslo, Norway

Review Status

This case study was translated from Norwegian and submitted to UNEP IE on behalf of the Norwegian State Pollution Control Authority by Stiftelsen Ostfoldforskning in February 1994. It was reviewed and edited by UNEP IE in July 1995.

Subsequently the case study has undergone a technical review by Dr Prasad Modak at Environmental Management Centre, Mumbai, India, in September 1998.