The installation of new cleaning equipment at Cutler Brands printing works in Adelaide, South Australia, has resulted in a 40 percent reduction in cleaning solvent used and an annual saving of almost $165,000. Not only was the investment of $45,000 recouped in 4 months through savings and increased productivity, but exposure of employees to hazardous fumes and chemicals substantially reduced.
South Australian company, Cutler Brands Pty. Ltd., employs 94 staff at its premises in the Adelaide suburb of Kilkenny. Since its establishment in 1946, the company has developed into a diversified operation based on modern screen printing.
The cleaning of printing screens at Cutler Brands generated each year approximately 2,200kg of ink soaked rags. Each printer was required, after each printing run, to clean ink from the screens using thinners. This process consumed considerable time and large amounts of solvent. Ink soaked rags were collected and taken to landfill. Fluids were discharged to the sewer after screening out solids. The annual cost of disposal was about $9,500.Staff in the screen shop were exposed to solvent fumes and to chemicals existing in an old open solvent reclaiming unit. The use of thinners and traditional reclaiming technology was a serious hazard to staff.
The company's decision to invest in new CPS Ink and Stencil Cleaner technology has increased productivity, improved the work environment, reduced environmental impacts and benefited the company financially.Screens are now washed in a central area by one operator, cleaned of ink, stains and stencils and fully renovated for reuse. The washing units are connected to the plant's exhaust system offering effective ventilation.
The CPS Ink Cleaner removes ink from the screens without using rags. The recycled screen wash is pumped and circulated from the upper level of the tank ensuring prolonged and improved cleaning. Diluted chemicals are used to make the ink soluble. Recirculation through a filter mat collects larger particles and prevents pump blockages. The solvent tank's conical shaped bottom ensures effective collection of sediments and facilitates removal of sludge.
CPS Ink Cleaner
The CPS Stencil Cleaner removes stencils. A spray dispenser unit keeps the stencil remover or degreaser in good order.
CPS Stencil Cleaner
The process has reduced considerably the number of ink soaked rags. More importantly, solvent recycling has led to a significant reduction in the volume of solvent used and sent off-site. The amount of solvent required has fallen by 60 percent, from 15,000 litres per annum before the initiative to the current level of 6,000 litres. Furthermore, the solvent now needs to be replaced only once every 4-6 months.The CPS system is far less hazardous than when thinners and traditional reclaiming technology were used. It has minimized the volume of generated waste, reduced hazardous content and reduced the amount of waste needing to be disposed. The system also filters waste and controls the pH of wastewater discharged to the sewer.
Installation of the CPS system has resulted in increased productivity. Print machine down time has been reduced by 1,950 hours per annum, representing an annual earnings opportunity of $105,000. The system provides additional earning capacity at no additional cost amounting to $25,000 and an improved gross profit from capacity increase of $25,000 per annum. Printers and juniors are freed from the tedious task of cleaning screens, time which is able to be spent on more productive activities. The overall increase in productivity is reflected in faster job delivery and client satisfaction.
In occupational, health and safety terms, operators are less exposed to fumes from thinners and the danger of spillage. The CPS system protects the operator from solvent vapors and contact with chemicals. Chemicals used by the system are very dilute, while elimination of flammable solvents has substantially reduced the risk of fire.
The cost of the initiative was $45,000, which was partly financed by an interest free loan of $22,529 from the South Australian Environment Protection Agency under its Cleaner Industries Demonstration Scheme.
With total annual savings of $164,930, the pay back period was approximately 4 months.
Total outlay 45,000Savings per annum $Savings in use of thinners
Savings in rag usage
Improved gross profit from capacity increase
Additional earning capacity without additional cost
Reduced print machine down time
Total Savings 6,190
3,740
25,000
25,000
105,000
164,930Payback period 4 months
The main motivators were the desire to improve resource management, minimise environmental impact and increase productivity.
No barriers were encountered.
Mr Jack Walter
Chief Executive Officer
Cutler Brands Pty. Ltd.
33 Humpries Terrace
Kilkenny
SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5009
Ph: 61 8 8268 9888
Fax: 61 8 8345 5986Case study coordinated by the South Australian Environment Protection Agency in association with the Environment Management Industry Association of Australia (EMIAA), June 1998.
The Cleaner Production Case Studies Directory is part of EnviroNET Australia.
- For more information contact:
Environment Australia
Environment Protection Group
PO Box E305
KINGSTON ACT 2604
AUSTRALIA
Email: cproduction@ea.gov.au
URL: http://www.environment.gov.au/net/environet.html