Preventing Mercury Pollution

A. ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER

1. Build Support
2. Form team
3. Perform an Assessment
4. Take Action
5. Document Share Results

To Case Studies Menu © Copyright


1. Build Support

St. Mary's Medical Center is a 326-bed hospital located in Duluth, Minnesota. To begin the mercury reduction project, WLSSD staff met with hospital management to ensure their interest and commitment to the project. Once support was assured, an existing team of hospital employees (who had already implemented an excellent solid waste reduction program) worked with WLSSD staff on the project.

To Top of Document


2. Form team

The team was made up of representatives from different areas of the hospital. This was important because of the wide variety of different activities performed in a hospital. Representatives from maintenance and purchasing were particularly important. The maintenance staff has knowledge of the inner workings of the hospital which is especially helpful when conducting monitoring. Toxics reduction projects often require that changes be made in the use of certain products. For this reason, a representative from the purchasing department is essential to the team.

To Top of Document


3. Perform an Assessment

As a first step in the project, the mercury reduction team completed a survey on mercury use provided by WLSSD. The survey disclosed that St. Mary's had already replaced some mercury containing items, such as thermometers and blood pressure cuffs, with alternative electronic devices. In addition, mercuric chloride, a common reagent used in pathology labs, was being captured and handled as hazardous waste instead of being flushed to the wastewater treatment plant.

A wastewater monitoring plan was then developed to try to pinpoint mercury sources within the hospital. Often several discharge points may enter the sanitary sewer system from an older building like a hospital. Meeting with maintenance staff to review old blueprints is essential before beginning a monitoring program. Particularly in facilities that have undergone expansion, the use of dye tablets may be needed to verify source information.

Monitoring results found mercury concentrations varying from 0.3 ppb to 1.2 ppb. The monitoring also identified the days on which mercury concentrations were high, and where it came from in the hospital. In this case, the monitoring results were valuable in educating the reduction team. The team felt they had already solved their mercury problem, and did'nt anticipate additional discharges. Once they saw the numbers, however, a "can do" attitude quickly developed.

To Top of Document


4. Take Action

At this point, the mercury in the wastewater appears to be coming from the hospital laboratories and from the laundry services. Reagents and bleach are the suspected sources. These products are being investigated and where possible, alternatives will be substituted. Historic sources are also under investigation. In older buildings where there has been high mercury use in the past, items such as broken thermometers may have been disposed of down the drain. The mercury accumulates in waste traps and is discharged in small amounts each time water is used. Traps in nursing stations and in the labs are being cleaned as part of the reduction effort.

To Top of Document


5. Document Share Results

WLSSD staff will continue to work with St. Mary's on future reduction efforts. New information about sources of mercury and additional wastewater monitoring results are shared with the team in regular meetings. Reductions in mercury discharge will continue to be documented and shared.

To Top of Document