PLURAL COMPONENT PROPORTIONING SYSTEM FOR EPOXY PAINTS

Revision: 8/96

Process Code: Navy and Marine Corps: ID-05-99; Air Force: PA01; Army: PNT

Usage List: Navy: Low; Marine Corps: Low; Army: Medium; Air Force: Medium

Substitute For: Manual Paint Mixing of Epoxy Paints

Applicable EPCRA Targeted Constituents: Toluene (CAS: 108-88-3), Xylenes (CAS: 1330-20-7), Methyl Ethyl Ketone (CAS: 78-93-3), Acetone (CAS: 67-64-1), n-Butyl Alcohol (CAS: 71-36-3), Lead (CAS: 7439-92-1), Chromium (CAS: 7440-47-3), Zinc Compounds


Overview:

Plural component proportioning systems are self-contained epoxy paint proportioning and mixing systems. These systems provide proper mixing and precise generation of paint required by an application and consequently generate minimal waste.

Epoxy paint mixtures are prepared by premixing a base and a catalyst, and combining them in appropriate proportions in a separate container. After mixing and waiting the specified time, application of the paint to the workpiece may proceed. Epoxy paint ingredients have a limited pot life once mixed which cannot be exceeded without affecting the characteristics of the paint. If the pot life is exceeded, the mixture must be disposed, and the application equipment must be cleaned with a solvent. Under conventional methods, the mixture is prepared by hand. This frequently results in the generation of excess paint, which requires solvent cleanup and disposal of the paint and solvent as a hazardous waste.

Plural component proportioning systems are used in conjunction with application devices. The proportioning and application system layout typically includes the following components: 1) proportioning pump module, 2) mix manifold, 3) mixer, 4) application device, 5) material supply module, and 6) purge or flush module. These systems optimize painting operations by maximizing efficiency and minimizing waste generated.

The plural component proportioning system for epoxy paints provides total control of materials from container(s) to application. They are accurate and can provide more consistent material quality than hand mixing. These systems can also keep pace with higher production requirements. They mix on demand (i.e. as the gun is triggered), which results in no significant quantities of wasted materials. Material cleanup requires less labor and maintenance, and generates less waste because the mixed material can be purged with solvent from the mix manifold, mixer, hose, and applicator before it cures. The plural component proportioning system is a closed system and, as a result, there are fewer spills, less contamination or waste to clean up, and less contact between personnel and potentially hazardous materials. In addition, the proportioning system makes bulk purchase of material practical.

If an epoxy paint requires a significant induction time (15 minutes or longer) the plural component proportioning system can still be used, provided that the mixed paint is allowed to stand in a separate container prior to application.

No new wastestreams are generated using Plural Component Proportioning Systems as compared to conventional methods.

Materials Compatibility:

Material specification data for the epoxy paint materials needs to be evaluated with respect to the proportioning and application system components prior to specification of the actual system to ensure material compatibility. The materials used for the pumps and packings need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Stainless steel and TeflonŽ components do not pose compatibility problems with most materials used in epoxy paint operations.

Safety and Health:

Health concerns are dependent on the variety of paint that is used. Inhalation of lead- and zinc chromate-based paints can lead to irritation of the respiratory system. Some lead compounds are carcinogenic. Solvent-based paints can irritate the lungs and mucous membranes. Prolonged exposure can affect respiration and the central nervous system. Proper personal protection (PPE) equipment should be used. These safety and health issues are also applicable when using conventional methods.

Consult your local industrial health specialist, your local health and safety personnel, and the appropriate MSDS prior to implementing this technology.

Benefits:

  • Plural component proportioning system provides total control of materials from container to application.
  • Paint is generated on an as-needed basis, eliminating the generation of excess paint. Under conventional methods, this excess paint is frequently disposed of as a hazardous waste.
  • The use of cleanup solvents is minimized.
  • Less potential for spills.
  • Less contact between personnel and potentially hazardous materials

Disadvantage:

  • Plural component proportioning systems need to be designed for specific applications.

Economic Analysis:

Capital costs for plural component proportioning systems can range from $50,000 to $70,000 for systems that mix multiple materials or $6,000 to $7,000 for basic units that mix two materials. Application systems are additional and their capital costs can range from $500 to $5,000. Each application needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with respect to material and labor costs and savings.

The following is an example of the replacement of a hand-mixing paint operation with a relatively simple Plural Component Proportioning System.

Assumptions:

  • Annual paint usage for hand mixing system: 4,000 gallons
  • Annual solvent usage for hand mixing system: 2,250 gallons
  • Annual labor required for equipment cleaning using hand mixing system: 250 hours
  • Annual solid paint waste generated using hand mixing system: 5,500 pounds
  • Paint cost: $85/gallon
  • Solvent cost: $7/gallon
  • Labor rate: $45/hr
  • Paint solid waste disposal at $1/pound
  • Solvent waste disposal at $3/gallon
  • All solvent is disposed as waste
  • Plural component proportioning system reduces paint usage by 15%
  • Plural component proportioning system reduces solvent usage and waste by 50%
  • Plural component proportioning system reduces labor usage by 50%
  • Plural component proportioning system reduces paint waste by 50%

Annual Operating Cost Comparison for
Plural Component Proportioning System and Hand Mixing System

Plural Component Proportioning System Hand Mixing System
Operational Costs:
Labor: $5,600 $11,300
Paint and Solvent: $296,900 $355,800
Waste Disposal $6,100 $12,300
Total Costs: $308,600 $379,400
Total Income: $0 $0
Annual Benefit: -$308,600 -$379,400

Economic Analysis Summary

  • Annual Savings for Plural Component System: $70,800
  • Capital Cost for Diversion Equipment/Process: $15,000
  • Payback Period for Investment in Equipment/Process: <1 year

Approving Authority:

Navy: Approval is controlled locally and should be implemented only after engineering approval has been granted. Major claimant approval is not required.

Point of Contact:

Scott Mauro
Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, Code 423
1100 23rd Avenue
Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370
Phone: (805) 982-4889, DSN: 551-4889
FAX: (805) 982-4832

Vendors:

The following is a list of plural component proportioning system manufacturers. This is not meant to be a complete list, as there may be other manufacturers of this type of equipment.

DeVilbiss Ransburg Industrial Liquid Systems
320 Phillips Avenue
Toledo, OH 43612
Phone: (800) 233-3366
Fax: (419) 470-2270

Graco Inc.
P.O. Box 1441
Minneapolis, MN 55440-1441
Phone: (800) 367-4023
Fax: (612) 623-6777

Binks Manufacturing Company
9201 Belmont Avenue
Franklin Park, IL 60131-2887
Phone: (847) 671-3000
Fax: (847) 671-4248

Source: Mr. Jeff Smith, DeVilbiss Ransburg Industrial Liquid Systems, Toledo, OH
Mr. Carl Springer, Binks Manufacturing Company, Franklin Park, IL